Downloaded 735 times
Uploaded byJosh Clemm
Scaling LinkedIn - A Brief History
LinkedIn started in 2003 with 2700 members in the first week and has since grown to over 400 million members globally. It initially had a monolithic Java application called Leo serving all pages and using a single SQL database. To scale, LinkedIn developed its first dedicated service for the member connection graph and another for search. It later introduced replica databases, extracted services from Leo using a service-oriented architecture, added caching, and implemented Kafka as a universal data pipeline. LinkedIn now has over 750 services, uses multiple data centers, and architectures like Rest.li and various data infrastructure solutions to continue scaling as a global site with massive traffic and data volumes.
More Related Content
Similar to Scaling LinkedIn - A Brief History
Scaling LinkedIn - A Brief History
- 1.
- 2. Scaling = replacingall the components of a car while driving it at 100mph “ Via Mike Krieger, “Scaling Instagram”
- 3. LinkedIn started backin 2003 to “connect to your network for better job opportunities.” It had 2700 members in first week.
- 4. First week growthguesses from founding team
- 5. 0M 50M 300M 250M 200M 150M 100M 400M 32M 2003 2004 20052006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 5 400M 350M Fast forward to today...
- 6. LinkedIn is aglobal site with over 400 million members Web pages and mobile traffic are served at tens of thousands of queries per second Backend systems serve millions of queries per second LINKEDIN SCALE TODAY
- 7. 7 How did weget there?
- 8. Let’s start from thebeginning
- 9.
- 10. DB LEO ● Huge monolithicapp called Leo ● Java, JSP, Servlets, JDBC ● Served every page, same SQL database LEO Circa 2003 LINKEDIN’S ORIGINAL ARCHITECTURE
- 11. So far sogood, but two areas to improve: 1. The growing member to member connection graph 2. The ability to search those members
- 12. ● Needed tolive in-memory for top performance ● Used graph traversal queries not suitable for the shared SQL database. ● Different usage profile than other parts of site MEMBER CONNECTION GRAPH
- 13. MEMBER CONNECTION GRAPH So,a dedicated service was created. LinkedIn’s first service. ● Needed to live in-memory for top performance ● Used graph traversal queries not suitable for the shared SQL database. ● Different usage profile than other parts of site
- 14. ● Social networksneed powerful search ● Lucene was used on top of our member graph MEMBER SEARCH
- 15. ● Social networksneed powerful search ● Lucene was used on top of our member graph MEMBER SEARCH LinkedIn’s second service.
- 16. LINKEDIN WITH CONNECTIONGRAPH AND SEARCH Member GraphLEO DB RPC Circa 2004 Lucene Connection / Profile Updates
- 17. Getting better, butthe single database was under heavy load. Vertically scaling helped, but we needed to offload the read traffic...
- 18. ● Master/slave concept ●Read-only traffic from replica ● Writes go to main DB ● Early version of Databus kept DBs in sync REPLICA DBs Main DB Replica ReplicaDatabus relay Replica DB
- 19. ● Good mediumterm solution ● We could vertically scale servers for a while ● Master DBs have finite scaling limits ● These days, LinkedIn DBs use partitioning REPLICA DBs TAKEAWAYS Main DB Replica ReplicaDatabus relay Replica DB
- 20. Member GraphLEO RPC Main DB ReplicaReplicaDatabus relayReplica DB Connection Updates R/WR/O Circa 2006 LINKEDIN WITH REPLICA DBs Search Profile Updates
- 21. As LinkedIn continuedto grow, the monolithic application Leo was becoming problematic. Leo was difficult to release, debug, and the site kept going down...
- 25. Kill LEOIT WASTIME TO...
- 26. Public Profile Web App ProfileService LEO Recruiter Web App Yet another Service Extracting services (Java Spring MVC) from legacy Leo monolithic application Circa 2008 on SERVICE ORIENTED ARCHITECTURE
- 27. ● Goal -create vertical stack of stateless services ● Frontend servers fetch data from many domains, build HTML or JSON response ● Mid-tier services host APIs, business logic ● Data-tier or back-tier services encapsulate data domains Profile Web App Profile Service Profile DB SERVICE ORIENTED ARCHITECTURE
- 29. Groups Content Service Connections Content Service Profile Content Service Browser / App Frontend WebApp Mid-tier Service Mid-tier Service Mid-tier Service Edu Data Service Data Service Hadoop DB Voldemort EXAMPLE MULTI-TIER ARCHITECTURE AT LINKEDIN Kafka
- 30. PROS ● Stateless services easilyscale ● Decoupled domains ● Build and deploy independently CONS ● Ops overhead ● Introduces backwards compatibility issues ● Leads to complex call graphs and fanout SERVICE ORIENTED ARCHITECTURE COMPARISON
- 31. bash$ eh -e%%prod | awk -F. '{ print $2 }' | sort | uniq | wc -l 756 ● In 2003, LinkedIn had one service (Leo) ● By 2010, LinkedIn had over 150 services ● Today in 2015, LinkedIn has over 750 services SERVICES AT LINKEDIN
- 32. Getting better, butLinkedIn was experiencing hypergrowth...
- 34. ● Simple wayto reduce load on servers and speed up responses ● Mid-tier caches store derived objects from different domains, reduce fanout ● Caches in the data layer ● We use memcache, couchbase, even Voldemort Frontend Web App Mid-tier Service Cache DB Cache CACHING
- 35. There are onlytwo hard problems in Computer Science: Cache invalidation, naming things, and off-by-one errors. “ Via Twitter by Kellan Elliott-McCrea and later Jonathan Feinberg
- 36. CACHING TAKEAWAYS ● Cachesare easy to add in the beginning, but complexity adds up over time. ● Over time LinkedIn removed many mid-tier caches because of the complexity around invalidation ● We kept caches closer to data layer
- 37. CACHING TAKEAWAYS (cont.) ●Services must handle full load - caches improve speed, not permanent load bearing solutions ● We’ll use a low latency solution like Voldemort when appropriate and precompute results
- 38. LinkedIn’s hypergrowth wasextending to the vast amounts of data it collected. Individual pipelines to route that data weren’t scaling. A better solution was needed...
- 40. KAFKA MOTIVATIONS ● LinkedIngenerates a ton of data ○ Pageviews ○ Edits on profile, companies, schools ○ Logging, timing ○ Invites, messaging ○ Tracking ● Billions of events everyday ● Separate and independently created pipelines routed this data
- 41. A WHOLE LOTOF CUSTOM PIPELINES...
- 42. A WHOLE LOTOF CUSTOM PIPELINES... As LinkedIn needed to scale, each pipeline needed to scale.
- 43. Distributed pub-sub messagingplatform as LinkedIn’s universal data pipeline KAFKA Kafka Frontend service Frontend service Backend Service DWH Monitoring Analytics HadoopOracle
- 44. BENEFITS ● Enabled nearrealtime access to any data source ● Empowered Hadoop jobs ● Allowed LinkedIn to build realtime analytics ● Vastly improved site monitoring capability ● Enabled devs to visualize and track call graphs ● Over 1 trillion messages published per day, 10 million messages per second KAFKA AT LINKEDIN
- 45. OVER 1 TRILLIONPUBLISHED DAILY OVER 1 TRILLION PUBLISHED DAILY
- 46. Let’s end with themodern years
- 48. ● Services extractedfrom Leo or created new were inconsistent and often tightly coupled ● Rest.li was our move to a data model centric architecture ● It ensured a consistent stateless Restful API model across the company. REST.LI
- 49. ● By usingJSON over HTTP, our new APIs supported non-Java-based clients. ● By using Dynamic Discovery (D2), we got load balancing, discovery, and scalability of each service API. ● Today, LinkedIn has 1130+ Rest.li resources and over 100 billion Rest.li calls per day REST.LI (cont.)
- 50.
- 51. Rest.li R2/D2 techstack REST.LI (cont.)
- 52. LinkedIn’s success withData infrastructure like Kafka and Databus led to the development of more and more scalable Data infrastructure solutions...
- 53. ● It wasclear LinkedIn could build data infrastructure that enables long term growth ● LinkedIn doubled down on infra solutions like: ○ Storage solutions ■ Espresso, Voldemort, Ambry (media) ○ Analytics solutions like Pinot ○ Streaming solutions ■ Kafka, Databus, and Samza ○ Cloud solutions like Helix and Nuage DATA INFRASTRUCTURE
- 54.
- 55. LinkedIn is aglobal company and was continuing to see large growth. How else to scale?
- 56. ● Natural progressionof horizontally scaling ● Replicate data across many data centers using storage technology like Espresso ● Pin users to geographically close data center ● Difficult but necessary MULTIPLE DATA CENTERS
- 57. ● Multiple datacenters are imperative to maintain high availability. ● You need to avoid any single point of failure not just for each service, but the entire site. ● LinkedIn runs out of three main data centers, additional PoPs around the globe, and more coming online every day... MULTIPLE DATA CENTERS
- 58. MULTIPLE DATA CENTERS LinkedIn'soperational setup as of 2015 (circles represent data centers, diamonds represent PoPs)
- 59. Of course LinkedIn’sscaling story is never this simple, so what else have we done?
- 60. ● Each ofLinkedIn’s critical systems have undergone their own rich history of scale (graph, search, analytics, profile backend, comms, feed) ● LinkedIn uses Hadoop / Voldemort for insights like People You May Know, Similar profiles, Notable Alumni, and profile browse maps. WHAT ELSE HAVE WE DONE?
- 61. ● Re-architected frontendapproach using ○ Client templates ○ BigPipe ○ Play Framework ● LinkedIn added multiple tiers of proxies using Apache Traffic Server and HAProxy ● We improved the performance of servers with new hardware, advanced system tuning, and newer Java runtimes. WHAT ELSE HAVE WE DONE? (cont.)
- 62. Scaling sounds easyand quick to do, right?
- 63. Hofstadter's Law: Italways takes longer than you expect, even when you take into account Hofstadter's Law. “ Via Douglas Hofstadter, Gödel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid
- 64.
- 65. ● Blog versionof this slide deck https://engineering.linkedin.com/architecture/brief-history-scaling-linkedin ● Visual story of LinkedIn’s history https://ourstory.linkedin.com/ ● LinkedIn Engineering blog https://engineering.linkedin.com ● LinkedIn Open-Source https://engineering.linkedin.com/open-source ● LinkedIn’s communication system slides which include earliest LinkedIn architecture http://www.slideshare. net/linkedin/linkedins-communication-architecture ● Slides which include earliest LinkedIn data infra work http://www.slideshare.net/r39132/linkedin-data-infrastructure-qcon-london-2012 LEARN MORE
- 66. ● Project Inversion- internal project to enable developer productivity (trunk based model), faster deploys, unified services http://www.bloomberg.com/bw/articles/2013-04-10/inside-operation-inversion-the-code- freeze-that-saved-linkedin ● LinkedIn’s use of Apache Traffic server http://www.slideshare.net/thenickberry/reflecting-a-year-after-migrating-to-apache-traffic- server ● Multi Data Center - testing fail overs https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/armen-hamstra-how-he-broke-linkedin-got-promoted- angel-au-yeung LEARN MORE (cont.)
- 67. ● History andmotivation around Kafka http://www.confluent.io/blog/stream-data-platform-1/ ● Thinking about streaming solutions as a commit log https://engineering.linkedin.com/distributed-systems/log-what-every-software-engineer- should-know-about-real-time-datas-unifying ● Kafka enabling monitoring and alerting http://engineering.linkedin.com/52/autometrics-self-service-metrics-collection ● Kafka enabling real-time analytics (Pinot) http://engineering.linkedin.com/analytics/real-time-analytics-massive-scale-pinot ● Kafka’s current use and future at LinkedIn http://engineering.linkedin.com/kafka/kafka-linkedin-current-and-future ● Kafka processing 1 trillion events per day https://engineering.linkedin.com/apache-kafka/how-we_re-improving-and-advancing- kafka-linkedin LEARN MORE - KAFKA
- 68. ● Open sourcingDatabus https://engineering.linkedin.com/data-replication/open-sourcing-databus-linkedins-low- latency-change-data-capture-system ● Samza streams to help LinkedIn view call graphs https://engineering.linkedin.com/samza/real-time-insights-linkedins-performance-using- apache-samza ● Real-time analytics (Pinot) http://engineering.linkedin.com/analytics/real-time-analytics-massive-scale-pinot ● Introducing Espresso data store http://engineering.linkedin.com/espresso/introducing-espresso-linkedins-hot-new- distributed-document-store LEARN MORE - DATA INFRASTRUCTURE
- 69. ● LinkedIn’s useof client templates ○ Dust.js http://www.slideshare.net/brikis98/dustjs ○ Profile http://engineering.linkedin.com/profile/engineering-new-linkedin-profile ● Big Pipe on LinkedIn’s homepage http://engineering.linkedin.com/frontend/new-technologies-new-linkedin-home-page ● Play Framework ○ Introduction at LinkedIn https://engineering.linkedin. com/play/composable-and-streamable-play-apps ○ Switching to non-block asynchronous model https://engineering.linkedin.com/play/play-framework-async-io-without-thread-pool- and-callback-hell LEARN MORE - FRONTEND TECH
- 70. ● Introduction toRest.li and how it helps LinkedIn scale http://engineering.linkedin.com/architecture/restli-restful-service-architecture-scale ● How Rest.li expanded across the company http://engineering.linkedin.com/restli/linkedins-restli-moment LEARN MORE - REST.LI
- 71. ● JVM memorytuning http://engineering.linkedin.com/garbage-collection/garbage-collection-optimization-high- throughput-and-low-latency-java-applications ● System tuning http://engineering.linkedin.com/performance/optimizing-linux-memory-management- low-latency-high-throughput-databases ● Optimizing JVM tuning automatically https://engineering.linkedin.com/java/optimizing-java-cms-garbage-collections-its- difficulties-and-using-jtune-solution LEARN MORE - SYSTEM TUNING
- 72. LinkedIn continues togrow quickly and there’s still a ton of work we can do to improve. We’re working on problems that very few ever get to solve - come join us! WE’RE HIRING