Software Testing QA: Automated Testing vs. Manual Testing. Which to Use, and When? Some analy Software automated testing vs maniual testing

Software Testing QA: Automated Testing vs. Manual Testing. Which to Use, and When? Some analy Software automated testing vs maniual testing

• 1.
  elinext.com Software Automated Testing vs Manual Testing Softwaretestingistheprocessofverifyingthat softwareproductsnotonlyfulfilthepurposesthey havebeendesignedforbutarealsoerror-free. Softwaretestingincludestheanalysis,observation, examination,andevaluationofmultipleaspectsofa productbeforeitislaunchedtothemarket. Manualtestingisaprocessinwhichtestersmanuallyperformdifferenttestcases withoutusingautomatedtools.Thekeypurposeofmanualtestingistomakesure thattheproductmeetsthespecifiedfunctionalrequirementsandiserror-free. Apartfromanextensiveskillsset,performingmanualtestingalsorequires substantialpatienceandcreativity. Softwaretestingcanbe categorizedaccording tomultiplecriteria. Herearethemaintypes ofsoftwaretesting: Type:manual,automated Functionaltesting(includessystem testing,betatesting,unittesting, integrationtesting,etc.) Non-functionaltesting(includes reliabilitytesting,performance testing,securitytesting,usability testing,etc.) ToolsforManualTesting ToolsforAutomatedTesting Testingsoftwarecomeswithaseriesofbenefits: Ensuresqualityandperformance Reducestherisk offailure Preventsvulnerability Enhancescustomersatisfaction Identifieserrorsand/ormissing requirementsatanearlystage Maypreventcatastrophicincidents (e.g. systemblackouts, communicationbreakdowns, etc.) Reducesdevelopmentcosts Preventbugs Facilitatestheadditionofnew features Improvesuserexperience Detectscompatibilitywith various platformsanddevices Manualtesting Manual Testing vs. Automated Testing TypesofManualTesting: StepstoperformManualTesting: 1 Analysethesoftwareprojectdocumentationand, if available, theAUT(i.e., ApplicationUnderTest) 3 HavethetestverifiedbytheQAleader(ortheclient, ifnecessary) 6 Oncethebugsarefixed, executethefailedtestsagaintoensuretheypass 2 Drafttestcasesinaccordancewithallthedefinedrequirements 4 Executetestcases 5 Reportallthedetectedbugs Automatedtestingisasoftwaretestingtechniqueusedtotestandcontrastthe expectedoutcomewiththeactualone.Testerswritetestscriptsandusetest automationtoolstoexecutethem,thusmakingtestingfasterandreducingthe riskofhumanerrors. AutomatedTesting StepstoperformAutomatedTesting: ThetypesofAutomatedTestinginclude(butarenotlimitedto): 1 RecruitAutomationToolExperts(i.e.automation engineersandautomationarchitects) 3 Choosethemostsuitableautomatedtestingtool 6 Developanexecutionplan 7 Writescripts 8 Report 9 Ensurescriptmaintenance 2 Decidewhichtestcasestoautomate 4 Traintheautomationteams 5 Createthetestautomationframework WhiteBox:theQAisfamiliarwith thestructureorinternalcodeofthe app.WhiteBoxisusedmainlyfor unittestingandotherspecific techniquessuchaspathtesting, controlflowtesting,flowtesting, decisioncoverage,etc. GreyBox:thisapproachcombineswhiteboxandblackboxtechniquesto identifybugscausedbystructuralflawsorinappropriateusage. Black Box:theQAisnotfamiliar withthestructureorinternalcode oftheappandinteractswithit fromanend-userperspectiveto testitsfunctionalandnon- functionalfeatures. UI Tests IntegrationTests PerformanceTests API Testing SecurityTests UnitTesting ManualandAutomatedTestingarenotonlyinterdependentbuttheybothcomewith aseriesofprosandcons.However,tohighlighttheobvious,thoroughsoftwaretesting beforeitgoesliveistheonlywaytoensureperformance,dependability,security, customersatisfaction,cost-effectiveness,and– ultimately– anincreasedROI. Wrap up !! ManualTestingBenefits EnsuresamoreaccurateUI testing Certainfeaturesaremoresuitable formanualtesting(e.g.usability, appcrashes,userexperience scenarios,etc.) Cost-effectiveandfastforsmall projects EasytoadapttoUI changes Minorissuescanbeanalysed immediatelywithouttheneedto writeacodeandexecuteit Noenvironmentlimitations Allowsforhumanobservation (i.e.,testersmayidentifydefects andprovidedevelopment suggestions) Noneedforprogramming ManualTestingPitfalls Tasksarecompletedentirelymanually Time-consuming Boring,repetitive,andprone tohumanerror Difficulttoensurecomplete testcoverage Requiresskilledhumanresources Highcostsforlargeprojects Maynotdetectallthedefects Itisnotreusable NotfeasibleforPerformanceTesting AutomatedTestingBenefits Ensuresenhancedtestcoverage Moreefficientandlesstime consumingthanmanualtesting Eliminatestheriskofhumanerrors Scalableforlargeprojects Idealforrepeatedandlarge- volumetesting Runsmultipletestssimultaneously Accurateandreliable Reusable Providesquickfeedback Programmable Freesuptesters’time AutomatedTestingPitfalls Costlyandslowforsmallprojects Lackofflexibilityandcreativity Unabletotestuserexperience scenarios MoredifficulttoadapttoUI changes Requiresmaintenance(effortandtime) Mayproducefalsenegatives Notsuitableforalltestingtypes (e.g.visualtesting,usability,etc.) Doesnotallowrandomtesting Programmingknowledgeismandatory Debuggingtestscriptsis amajorproblem