Winning Horizon 2020
with Open Science
Ivo Grigorov, Mikael Elbaek, Najla Rettberg,
Joy Davidson, Martin Donnelly
Based on: Winning Horizon 2020 with Open Science, http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12247
www.fosteropenscience.eu
“Research Cycle” adapted from Tenopir et al., (2011) doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021101
http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0021101
IDEA
TEST
DATA
MODEL
CODE
PUBLISH
RESEARCH
LIFECYCLE
Peer-
review
Impact Factor
(IF)
EDUCATE
& TRAIN
Dr. Alan Leshner,
CEO AAAS & Publisher of ”Science” journal
#esof2014 pic.twitter.com/M9D0rVtggI
24/06/2014 16:53
@ fosterscience
"Focus on Impact (Factor) distorts
what matters in science”
Useful
Research
Publishable
Accessible Credibilty?
Source: michaelnielsen.org
« 60% of UCL-published
research was easily
accessible »
Source: Paul Ayres, Senior Manager
University College London,
Library & Infomation Services (pers. comm.)
… and the rest ?
« around 50% of scientific papers
published in 2011 now
available for free »
Source: Proportion of Open Access
Peer-Reviewed Papers in 2004-2011,
Science Metrix Aug 2013, EC Commissioned Study
http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-13-786_en.htm
2002
2011
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v461/n7261/index.html
”If we wait 5 years for (Arctic) data
to be released, the Arctic is going
to be a very different place”
Bryn Nelson, Nature 10 Sept 2009
Open Science can Multiply Serendipity
in research …
Source:	
  Grigorov	
  2011,	
  ”Should	
  Ci6zen	
  Scien6sts	
  
play	
  with	
  Climate	
  &	
  Ecosystem	
  Moldes?”,	
  	
  
European	
  Geoscience	
  Union	
  NewsleFer	
  
Jim Hansen’s collaborator
at NASA GISS, Dr Ruedy says:
“I hope to switch to
your version.”
… so why not in OUR disciplines?
Why Open Science ?
ü  greater visibility and impact for authors & projects
ü  makes research networked & interconnected
ü  networked research generates serendipity by
default
ü  Speeds up innovation & discovery, takes ideas to
the market & solutions to societal challenges
ü  Directly contributes to ECONOMIC GROWTH !!!
What is the
Horizon 2020
	
   Grant Agreement Article 29.1-6
mandate	
  ?Based on: Winning Horizon 2020 with Open Science,
http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12247
Grant Agreement Article 29.1– 6
Source: http://ec.europa.eu/
research/participants/data/ref/
h2020/grants_manual/amga/
h2020-amga_en.pdfwww.fosteropenscience.eu
“Each beneficiary must ensure open
access to all peer-reviewed
scientific publications”
“deposit research data …
to make it possible
for third parties to access,
mine, exploit,
reproduce and disseminate,
free of charge”
Source:	
  www.wordle.net	
  www.fosteropenscience.eu
1.  Excellence:
Objectives
Relevance to WorkProgram
Concept & Approach
Ambition min 3/5 POINTS
2.  Impact:
Expected impact to WorkProgram
Maximise Impact (Open Access & Open Data)
min 3/5 POINTS
3.  Implementation:
Workplan & Management
Consortium & Resources min 3/5 POINTS
Winning Horizon 2020 with Open Science?
Dealing with the proposal template
Source: Winning Horizon 2020 with Open Science, 10.5281/zenodo.12247
2. IMPACT (min 3/5 points):
2.1 Expected impact to WorkProgram
- expected impacts set out in the work programme
- delivering innovations to the markets
- socially important impacts
2.2 Maximise Impact (Open Access & Open Data)
- plan for results dissemination and exploitation
- research data management for verification & re-use
- knowledge strategy management & Open Access
Winning Horizon 2020 with Open Science?
Dealing with the proposal template
Source: Winning Horizon 2020 with Open Science, 10.5281/zenodo.12247
Source: Winning Horizon 2020 with Open Science, 10.5281/zenodo.12247
How to “write”
#OpenScience
In your proposal ?
No need to
re-invent
the wheel.
?Bored	
  yet	
  
	
  
Does #OpenScience
matter at
	
  
proposal evaluation	
  
?Based on: Winning Horizon 2020 with Open Science,
http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12247
Source:	
  Horizon2020,	
  	
  
Marie	
  Curie	
  ETN	
  Evalua6on	
  Process,	
  2014	
  
“Weakness:
Involvement of non-academic beneficiaries is limited”
“Weakness: highly focused on academic activities,
and lacks an advanced communication strategy”
“Weakness: limited exposure to
non-academic partners & infrastructures”
Excellence
Impact
Implementation
“data accessibility is unclear!”
“data storage & access not considered”
Source:	
  Horizon2020,	
  	
  
Marie	
  Curie	
  ETN	
  Evalua6on	
  Process,	
  Spring	
  2015	
  
“Strengths: extensive dissemination of data to the
scientific community (open access, databases)”
“outreach activities to a broad audience”
“research software is freely available”
Impact:
Does #OpenScience
contribute to
	
  
economic Growth	
  ?Based on: Winning Horizon 2020 with Open Science,
http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12247
Source: McKinsey Global Institute 2013.
Open data: Unlocking innovation and
performance with liquid information
| McKinsey & Company.
Source: Houghton, J., Swan, A. & Brown, S. Access to
research and technical information in Denmark. (2011)
http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/272603
19% of the processes
developed would have been
delayed or abandoned
without access to research
a 2.2 years delay would
cost around EUR 5 million
per firm in lost sales
Does #OpenScience contribute to
Economic Growth?
IDEA &
PROPOSAL
TEST
DATA
MODEL
CODE
PUBLISH
RESEARCH
LIFECYCLE
Gold &
Green OA
EDUCATE
& TRAIN
Impact Factor (IF)
Societal Impact
CO-CREATION
Open
Notebook
Science re3data,
OpenAIRE
GitHub,
DOI
OS key part
of concept
Open
Educational
Resources
“Research Cycle” adapted from Tenopir et al., (2011) doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021101
http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0021101
Good Luck with
Horizon 2020!
Join the Open Science experiment at
www.fosteropenscience.eu
@ fosterscience
# fosteropenscience
www.fosteropenscience.eu
ivgr @ aqua.dtu.dk
slideshare.net/ivogrigorov/winning-
proposals-with-open-science

Winning research proposals with open science

  • 1.
    Winning Horizon 2020 withOpen Science Ivo Grigorov, Mikael Elbaek, Najla Rettberg, Joy Davidson, Martin Donnelly Based on: Winning Horizon 2020 with Open Science, http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12247
  • 2.
  • 3.
    “Research Cycle” adaptedfrom Tenopir et al., (2011) doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021101 http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0021101 IDEA TEST DATA MODEL CODE PUBLISH RESEARCH LIFECYCLE Peer- review Impact Factor (IF) EDUCATE & TRAIN
  • 4.
    Dr. Alan Leshner, CEOAAAS & Publisher of ”Science” journal #esof2014 pic.twitter.com/M9D0rVtggI 24/06/2014 16:53 @ fosterscience "Focus on Impact (Factor) distorts what matters in science”
  • 5.
  • 6.
    « 60% of UCL-published researchwas easily accessible » Source: Paul Ayres, Senior Manager University College London, Library & Infomation Services (pers. comm.) … and the rest ? « around 50% of scientific papers published in 2011 now available for free » Source: Proportion of Open Access Peer-Reviewed Papers in 2004-2011, Science Metrix Aug 2013, EC Commissioned Study http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-13-786_en.htm 2002 2011
  • 7.
    http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v461/n7261/index.html ”If we wait5 years for (Arctic) data to be released, the Arctic is going to be a very different place” Bryn Nelson, Nature 10 Sept 2009
  • 8.
    Open Science canMultiply Serendipity in research …
  • 9.
    Source:  Grigorov  2011,  ”Should  Ci6zen  Scien6sts   play  with  Climate  &  Ecosystem  Moldes?”,     European  Geoscience  Union  NewsleFer   Jim Hansen’s collaborator at NASA GISS, Dr Ruedy says: “I hope to switch to your version.” … so why not in OUR disciplines?
  • 10.
    Why Open Science? ü  greater visibility and impact for authors & projects ü  makes research networked & interconnected ü  networked research generates serendipity by default ü  Speeds up innovation & discovery, takes ideas to the market & solutions to societal challenges ü  Directly contributes to ECONOMIC GROWTH !!!
  • 11.
    What is the Horizon2020   Grant Agreement Article 29.1-6 mandate  ?Based on: Winning Horizon 2020 with Open Science, http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12247
  • 12.
    Grant Agreement Article29.1– 6 Source: http://ec.europa.eu/ research/participants/data/ref/ h2020/grants_manual/amga/ h2020-amga_en.pdfwww.fosteropenscience.eu “Each beneficiary must ensure open access to all peer-reviewed scientific publications” “deposit research data … to make it possible for third parties to access, mine, exploit, reproduce and disseminate, free of charge”
  • 13.
  • 14.
    1.  Excellence: Objectives Relevance toWorkProgram Concept & Approach Ambition min 3/5 POINTS 2.  Impact: Expected impact to WorkProgram Maximise Impact (Open Access & Open Data) min 3/5 POINTS 3.  Implementation: Workplan & Management Consortium & Resources min 3/5 POINTS Winning Horizon 2020 with Open Science? Dealing with the proposal template Source: Winning Horizon 2020 with Open Science, 10.5281/zenodo.12247
  • 15.
    2. IMPACT (min3/5 points): 2.1 Expected impact to WorkProgram - expected impacts set out in the work programme - delivering innovations to the markets - socially important impacts 2.2 Maximise Impact (Open Access & Open Data) - plan for results dissemination and exploitation - research data management for verification & re-use - knowledge strategy management & Open Access Winning Horizon 2020 with Open Science? Dealing with the proposal template Source: Winning Horizon 2020 with Open Science, 10.5281/zenodo.12247
  • 16.
    Source: Winning Horizon2020 with Open Science, 10.5281/zenodo.12247 How to “write” #OpenScience In your proposal ? No need to re-invent the wheel.
  • 17.
  • 18.
    Does #OpenScience matter at   proposal evaluation   ?Based on: Winning Horizon 2020 with Open Science, http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12247
  • 19.
    Source:  Horizon2020,     Marie  Curie  ETN  Evalua6on  Process,  2014   “Weakness: Involvement of non-academic beneficiaries is limited” “Weakness: highly focused on academic activities, and lacks an advanced communication strategy” “Weakness: limited exposure to non-academic partners & infrastructures” Excellence Impact Implementation “data accessibility is unclear!” “data storage & access not considered”
  • 20.
    Source:  Horizon2020,     Marie  Curie  ETN  Evalua6on  Process,  Spring  2015   “Strengths: extensive dissemination of data to the scientific community (open access, databases)” “outreach activities to a broad audience” “research software is freely available” Impact:
  • 21.
    Does #OpenScience contribute to   economic Growth  ?Based on: Winning Horizon 2020 with Open Science, http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12247
  • 22.
    Source: McKinsey GlobalInstitute 2013. Open data: Unlocking innovation and performance with liquid information | McKinsey & Company.
  • 24.
    Source: Houghton, J.,Swan, A. & Brown, S. Access to research and technical information in Denmark. (2011) http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/272603 19% of the processes developed would have been delayed or abandoned without access to research a 2.2 years delay would cost around EUR 5 million per firm in lost sales Does #OpenScience contribute to Economic Growth?
  • 25.
    IDEA & PROPOSAL TEST DATA MODEL CODE PUBLISH RESEARCH LIFECYCLE Gold & GreenOA EDUCATE & TRAIN Impact Factor (IF) Societal Impact CO-CREATION Open Notebook Science re3data, OpenAIRE GitHub, DOI OS key part of concept Open Educational Resources “Research Cycle” adapted from Tenopir et al., (2011) doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021101 http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0021101
  • 26.
    Good Luck with Horizon2020! Join the Open Science experiment at www.fosteropenscience.eu @ fosterscience # fosteropenscience www.fosteropenscience.eu ivgr @ aqua.dtu.dk slideshare.net/ivogrigorov/winning- proposals-with-open-science

Editor's Notes

  • #17 ODP trained, EURO-BASIN manager, – a boring title, for a diverse job, in an exciting research domain. DIP into EACH step of the research cycle, from proposal formulation to providing the best return-on-investment to the funders. So I`d like to share with you some experiences from the last few years of OS advocacy in the Marine Science Community