UX Design Process | Sample Proposal

User Experience & Product Design
Marta Fioni
6th November 2014
Proposal of work

Your needs Brief
Product Design
Information Architecture
To improve the user experience of
your current offering, by restructuring
the content architecture of the
website’s private area.
To discover gaps between
users’ needs and your
current offering. User Experience Design
Product Strategy
To understand the best
approach, resources, and
capabilities to
become a product-driven
organisation.

The project
Phase 1 | Determine users needs we want to meet
Phase 2 | Develop a user experience and information
architecture design that meets needs
Phase 3 | Implement it progressively
Phase 4 | Develop new capabilities*
*optional

Determine users needs we want to meet
Your content serves different users’ needs, in different situations. To revise the interface and information
architecture, we need to understand and prioritise these. This phase won’t take long, but is critical: it will
directly drive design decisions, align everyone, and guarantee we won’t miss anything.
Steps:
A. Produce a shortlist of personas and user situations
B. Determine primary and secondary personas
C. Stack rank use cases based on frequency, user relevance, and strategic importance for MM
D. Validate the resulting priority matrix with current users
Techniques:
A. Conduct in-dept in-person interviews with stakeholders
B. Desk analysis (competitive scenario and eco-system)
C. Survey for teachers, users and non-users (if required)
D. In-person interviews with users (approx. 5 interviews)
E. Internal workshop for idea generation & prioritisation
Deliverables
A. List of use cases and personas, sorted by priority
B. Interview transcripts
C. Survey results
Timeframe: 2 weeks

Sample output | Prioritisation map
Find new ideas
for lessons
Strategic
Importance
S A M P L E
MM introduction
if you missed training
Find new MM-compliant
tools to buy
Annual Termly Weekly Daily
*Frequency
Legend:
Find MM-compliant
resources
Evaluate non-MM resources
for compliance w/ system
Find new lesson
ideas
User
Frequency* importance

Develop a user experience and information
architecture that meets needs
This phase is the core of the project. We will develop and co-create different UI designs and information
architectures, 1
and iterate on them until we are confident they meet both users’ and business needs.
Steps:
A. Mapping out the current content architecture
B. Combine user interviews, design studio, and internally generated ideas into prototypes
C. Test prototypes with users, and converge iterations towards a coherent, validated solution
Techniques:
A. In-dept user interviews (approx. 8 interviews for each of the 3 personas)
B. Design studio, card sorting, other feature prioritisation techniques
C. Wire framing
D. User acceptance testing
Deliverables:
A. Sketches and low-fi paper prototypes
B. Testing materials as required
C. Sitemap and navigation architecture
D. Final wireframes and a clickable prototype
Timeframe: 6 weeks

Methodology | The UX process
Developing compelling user experiences is a scientific process at heart.
• In Phase 2 we will follow this process, by understanding the users’ context ( Research) , hypothesise
solutions, and test them with users (Design).
• Both Research and the Design start with divergent thinking and culminate with convergent thinking.
Hypothesis explored in the convergent thinking phase are then narrowed down into models that
can be iteratively tested. By the end of this process, a single validated solution will get
implemented.
• There are also standardised ways of analysing users behaviour through web metrics (e.g. cohort
analysis, task abandonment rates, etc). These can contribute to generate insights and keep learning
about the effectiveness of your design and content.
Research Design Deliver

Methodology Brief
Methodology | The UX process
Research Design Iterate
Identify your key users,
their needs and the tasks
they perform, using a mix
of quantitative and
qualitative research
methods.
Create various
prototypes of divergent
design solutions, to be
tested with these
key users.
Modify designs after each
round of testing, so that
the winning solution is
completely validated.

Methodology Brief
Methodology | Information Architecture
User Research
To achieve a full task analysis, the
prioritised use cases gets validated
by in-dept interviews.
At the end of this process, a series
of user flows diagrams will
represent the way users interact
and search for content on the site.
Information
User Flows Architecture
This task analysis, submitted to
iterative validation, will inform the re-design
of your current information
architecture. The content will be
organised within a new logical
structure that takes into account users
contexts of use, mental
models, and needs.

MMetehtohdoodloogylo | gCyomBprrieehfensive User Journey
IA
Persona
Situation
Content
Problem
Context
Navigation
Success
Satisfaction
Product Outcome
Solution
Space
E.g. “I’m an inexperienced
teacher late for class and need
to teach a module I’ve not
thought before”
Entry
Point
User Story
E.g.“I need worksheets from
another teacher. I’ll email them.
Oh, wait - I can google and find
it on Mathematics Mastery!”
E.g. “Ah, it doesn’t let me
google. But I think I have a
login. Now I click here . . .
here . . . . back . . . ah, here,
here. Download.!”
E.g. “I got what I needed. But
that was really frustrating, and
I’m late now. And still need to
print it.”
Preferred
Path

Methodology | User Research
Isolating patterns
1 3
User Interviews &
Contextual Enquires
Isolating Patterns
Prioritised Personas
& User Flows 2
Many in-dept interviews are run to verify your assumptions about different types of users, understand their
motivations and needs, and their current use of your website. Recurrent patterns will emerge and we will
isolate and represent them using different personas (mainly based on needs, not just demographics) and user
flows, that we will prioritise based on frequency and importance for the business.

Methodology | User Research
User Interviews &
Contextual Enquires
Isolating Patterns
Isolating patterns
Prioritised Personas
& User Flows
During the course of the user research phase, we will meet in person with around 30 different teachers, to
understand their motivations and experiences with your method, and observe their use of your website in
their ‘natural’ context. We will annotate transcripts of each interview and start isolating patterns ( through
card sorting workshop) , that will inform research deliverables ( user flows and personas).

Phase 2 | Design Process
+
Methodology | Design
Design Ideas
Iterations
Prototyping
Final Design
Testing with real and
pre-qualified users
From a first, diverse and divergent series of features ideas (e.g. generated during workshops or based on
industry standards, etc..) different design options are turned into low-fi prototypes and tested with a sample
of users, strategically selected from the ones interviewed. A series of iterations cycles ( e.g. 3 or 4 full
iterations) is run to progressively refine the final design, to meet the needs of different types of users.

Phase Design Examples
2 | Design Examples
Design Ideas
Prototyping
&Testing
Final Design
During the ideation and testing stage, a vast quantity of low-fi prototypes, such sketches, wireframes and
clickable interfaces will be shared with users to prove different solutions right or wrong, and iterate quickly
over the winning ones. The level of fidelity of prototypes will increase as we get closer to the final design.

Find Resources Why NAPs About Contact us
Resources Design
Design your NAP
The first step toward a high-impact NAP is an inclusive design process.
Conducting an inclusive design process, including consultation with civil society, stimulates
efficient coordination and communication, builds political will, and bolsters the plan’s chances of
success. In addition, NAP designers must carefully consider the results they hope to achieve
through the plan—developing a monitoring and evaluation
plan is a critical part of designing a high-impact NAP.
Design your NAP
The first step toward a high-impact NAP is an inclusive design process.
Conducting an inclusive design process, including consultation with civil society, stimulates
efficient coordination and communication, builds political will, and bolsters the plan’s chances of
success. In addition, NAP designers must carefully consider the results they hope to achieve
through the plan—developing a monitoring and evaluation
plan is a critical part of designing a high-impact NAP.
Design resources by subtopic
Defining roles
and
responsabilities
Conducting a
problem analysis
Building
political will
Identifying
Resources
Facilitating
inclusive
processes
Creating an
MA plan
We can help with design
Newsletter
Personas
Find Resources Why NAPs About Contact us
Resources by topic
Design
Facilitating inclusive processes
Conducting a problem analysis
Defining roles and responsibilities
Creating an ME plan
Building political will
Identifying resources
Monitoring
Evaluation
Developing MA plans,
outcomes, and indicators
Collecting, analysing and
managing data
Evaluating NAPs
Communicating results
In eum ignota primis nusquam, mel ex brute animal.
No vix consulatu dignissim, ex pri erant regione.
Learn interactively about NAPs
Et aperiri impedit eos, impetus debitis
definiebas in vix.Te ius decore tamquam elaboraret. Get started
NAPs Worldwide
Design
Implementation
Attaining meaningful participation
Achieving human security
Changing behaviours and attitudes
Coordinating actors
Maintaining political will
Securing resources
Implementation
Take part
Monitoring
Evaluation

Canada
Find your country
47 Afghanistan
Newest NAP
Card Sorting
for IA
User Flow
Wireframes
Wireframes

Implement the solution progressively
The validated solution needs to be implemented. Likely a progressive implementation (adding
features over time) is the best outcome, because it enables user feedback, metrics analysis, and
makes 1
best use - potentially limited - internal resources. This phase delivers a thorough
implementation plan.
Steps:
A. Work with internal stakeholders to understand resource availability tech systems
B. Prioritise the implementation
C. Determine relevant KPIs and metrics to monitor
D. Create a project roadmap, distributing roles and tasks
Techniques:
A. Stakeholders interviews
B. Sprint planning / prioritised backlog for development team or agency
C. Liaison with external parties (implementation / advisory) as required
Deliverables:
A. Project plan
B. Product road-map
C. List of tasks - brief to stakeholders
Timeframe: 1 week

Develop new capabilities*
Your goal is to turn your website from an a content offering to an interactive product that supports
users’ work 1
understanding, practice, and advocacy for Mathematics Mastery. During this phase we will
out together what resources (capabilities, team members, time) and one-off activities (further
research projects, development) are required to make this transition a reality
Approach:
A. Understand internal opportunities
B. Benchmark against similar offerings, best-in-class, and most innovative players in education space
C. Set high level objectives
Techniques:
A. Interviews with industry experts (tech, product, education)
B. Internal interviews
Deliverables:
A. Strategic briefing (presentation) summarising opportunity and required resources
B. High level implementation plan, particularly focusing around talent, change / change
management
C. If desired, an advisory panel to accompany facilitate the transition
Timeframe: 2 weeks *optional

Timeline and milestones
Interim presentation: research findings and user priorities
Week 1
Week 2
Week 3
Week 4
Week 5
Week 6
Week 7
Week 8
Interim presentation: designs
Week 9 Final presentation, wireframes and implementation plan

Marta Fioni | About
I am a User Experience Designer and Product Manager with five years of managerial experience, and an academic
background in Semiotics.
I managed a large classifieds website with over 5M monthly visitors, and 2M of items of user generated content,
distributed into 70 sub-categories, and localised and re-designed its content architecture.
I hold an MA in Semiotics from University of Bologna, running my research in Visual Anthropology and Cognitive
Science at UC Berkeley. I have recently specialised in UX Design attending the UX DI Course at General Assembly.
Thanks to my professional background and studies, I have access to a substantial network of digital professionals
(UX researchers, product managers, business and marketing strategists), that can collaborate with me on this
project as needed.
martafioni@gmail.com uk.linkedin.com/in/martafioni @martafioni

UX Design Process | Sample Proposal

In this document

More Related Content

What's hot

Similar to UX Design Process | Sample Proposal

Recently uploaded

UX Design Process | Sample Proposal