A whole new consulting industry is emerging around agentic AI risk analysis and abatement. The gap is massive: only 1% of organizations believe their AI adoption has reached maturity, yet 80% have already encountered risky AI agent behaviors. McKinsey’s new playbook highlights novel risks we haven’t seen before—chained vulnerabilities, synthetic-identity risks, and untraceable data leakage across agent networks. These aren’t traditional cybersecurity problems. Trust can’t be a feature of agentic systems; it must be the foundation. How are you approaching agentic AI governance? https://lnkd.in/gDepNmv7
Sean, fascinating insights! The emerging risks in agentic AI really highlight the need for proactive governance.
Super helpful share. My first step is doing at least some rudimentary product planning with the goal of identifying where these risks live in the process. I love how easy it is to spin up an app with tools like v0 but I also hate it. So easy to get sloppy (speaking from experience).
Drafting 2nd book. Focus on insurance commerce and cyber. Insurance industry veteran. Analyst background launching / leading insurance strategy practices at The META Group, Financial Insights (IDC), & Omdia.
3wOf course, the 1st question should always be: should our company use agent AI at all? If yes, why? If no, why?