6

I have a simple case which transforms a nested string array to a nested number array, no flatting

const strArr = ["1", "2", ["3", "4"], "5"];

function mapToNumber(item: string | Array<string>): number | Array<number> {
    if (Array.isArray(item)) {
        return item.map(mapToNumber); // line Hey
    } else {
        return Number(item);
    }
}
console.log(strArr.map(mapToNumber));

However TS yells at me: Type '(number | number[])[]' is not assignable to type 'number | number[]'. Then I changed line Hey to return item.map<number>(mapToNumber), doesn't work. Function overloading came to my mind, I gave it a try:

const isStringArray = (arr: any): arr is Array<string> => {
    return Array.isArray(arr) && arr.every(item => typeof item === "string");
}

function mapToNumber(item: string): number;
function mapToNumber(item: Array<string>): Array<number>;
function mapToNumber(item: any) {
    if (isStringArray(item)) {
        return item.map<number>(mapToNumber);
    } else {
        return Number(item);
    }
}

console.log(strArr.map(mapToNumber));

Even though I added the custom type guard, still doesn't work.

The logic is quite simple, but how can I define the correct type for this simple case? The playground link

Edit:

I gave generics a try, still doesn't work

function mapToNumber3<T extends string | Array<string>>(item: T): T extends string ? number : Array<number> {
    if (Array.isArray(item)) {
        return item.map(mapToNumber3);
    } else {
        return Number(item);
    }
}

3 Answers 3

3

In order to do that you can use f-bounded quantification:

const strArr = ["1", "2", ["3", "4"], "5"];


const mapToNumber = (item: string) => parseInt(item, 10)

const isString = (item: unknown): item is string => typeof item === "string"
const isStringArray = (arr: any): arr is Array<string> => Array.isArray(arr) && arr.every(isString)


const map = <
    N extends number,
    Elem extends `${N}` | Array<Elem>,
    T extends Array<T | Elem>,
    >(arr: [...T]): Array<unknown> => {
    return arr.map((item) => {
        if (isStringArray(item)) {
            return item.map(mapToNumber);
        }
        if (Array.isArray(item)) {
            return map(item)
        }
        if (isString(item)) {
            return mapToNumber(item)
        }
        return item
    })

}

const result = map(["1", "2", ["3", "4", ['6', ['7']]], "5"])

T extends Array<T | Elem> - T is a recursive generic

The safest approach is to return Array<unknown> since you don't know the deepnes of the array Playground

It is relatively easy to create recursive data structure type in typescript. See here, but it is hard to use it as a return type in function

Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

2 Comments

Seems like @jeremynac's answer is way more simple but this answer is more general , defining a NestedArray<T> already suffices, why bother using T extends Array<T | Elem>
Sure. I had several versions of the code. Just did not polished it
1

I would try to just define a type: type NestedArray<T> = T | NestedArray<T>[] to represent a nested array of type T. Then, you just type your variables in your original functions, and it should work.

type NestedArray<T> = T | NestedArray<T>[]

const strArr: NestedAr

ray<string> = ["1", "2", ["3", "4"], "5"];

const isStringArray = (arr: any): arr is Array<string> => {
    return Array.isArray(arr) && arr.every(item => typeof item === "string");
}

function mapToNumber(item: NestedArray<string>): NestedArray<number> {
    if (isStringArray(item)) {
        return item.map(mapToNumber);
    } else {
        return Number(item);
    }
}

console.log(strArr.map(mapToNumber));

Comments

0

More information on this Github issue (basically, there's no good way to currently do this sadly). Proposal for what you want here.

I think you just have to use as for now:

const strArr = ["1", "2", ["3", "4"], "5"];

function mapToNumber(item: string | string[]): number | number[] {
  if (typeof item === 'string') {
    return Number(item);
  } else {
      return item.map(mapToNumber) as number[]; // Here
  }
}

console.log(strArr.map(item => mapToNumber(item)));

Your example with overloading technically works if you add one more overload. Up to you if you think it's worth all the effort.

const strArr = ["1", "2", ["3", "4"], "5"];

const isStringArray = (arr: any): arr is Array<string> => {
  return Array.isArray(arr) && arr.every(item => typeof item === "string");
}

function mapToNumber(item: string): number;
function mapToNumber(item: string[]): number[];
function mapToNumber(item: string | string[]): number | number[]; // Add this
function mapToNumber(item: any) {
  if (isStringArray(item)) {
      return item.map<number>(mapToNumber);
  } else {
      return Number(item);
  }
}

console.log(strArr.map(mapToNumber));

Comments

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.