Unit 8: Freedom of Religion
 Constitutional Law – Articles 25 to 28
 Part III: Fundamental Rights
Constitutional Framework
 Article 25- 28 deals with the right to freedom of
religion.
 Provides for freedom of conscience and free
profession, practice and propagation of religion.
 Article 26 provides for freedom to manage
religious affairs.
 Article 27 provides freedom as to payment of
taxes for promotion of any particular religion.
 Article 28 provides for freedom as to attendance
at religious instruction or religious worship in
certain educational institutions.
Article 25: Structure of the
Provision
 Article 25(1) provide that all persons are equally entitle to freedom of
conscience and the right freely to profess, practice and propagate
religion.
• Freedom of Conscience: it is enough freedom of an individual to
mould his relationship with God in whatever manner he likes.
• Freedom to Profess religion means to declare openly and freely
one’s belief.
• Freedom to Propagate religion means to spread and publicise the
religious views.
 • The right is subject to following restrictions:
 Public order
 Morality
 Health
 Other provisions of Part 3
 The Commissioner, Hindu Religious Endowments, Madras vs Shri Lakshmindra
Tirtha Swamiyar of Shri Shirur Mutt (Shirur Mutt case) 1954
• A 7-Judge Bench of the Supreme Court held that what constitutes the
essential part of a religion is primarily to be ascertained with reference to the
doctrines of that religion itself. The court held that “religion” in Article 25
covers all rituals and practices that are “integral” or “essential” to a religion,
but the litigants have to prove these essential features.
 In Ismail Faruqui vs Union of India 1994 Supreme Court held that offer of
prayer for worship is religious practice but offering at every location where
such prayer can be offered would not be an essential religious practice.
 Church Of God (Full Gospel) of India vs KKRMC Welfare Association 2000
Supreme Court held that no person can be allowed to create noise pollution
or disturb the peace of others while exercising religious freedom. Religious
prayers through loudspeakers are not an essential element of any religion.
Article 25(2)
 IT provides that the state can make law for regulating or restricting economic, financial,
political or other secular activities associated with religious practice and also for social
welfare and reform for throwing open of Hindu religious institutions of public character to all
classes and sections of Hindus.
 Indian Young Lawyers Association & Ors vs State of Kerala & Ors 2018
• On 28th September 2018, the court delivered its verdict in this case by 4:1 majority which
held that the practice violated the fundamental rights to equality, liberty and freedom of
religion, Article 14, 15, 19(1), 21 and 25(1).
 It struck down Rule 3(b) of the Kerala Hindu Places of Public Worship Act as
unconstitutional. Rule 3(b) allowed for Hindu denominations to exclude women from public
places of worship if the exclusion was based on custom.
 • The apex court allowed entry of women of all age groups to the Sabarimala Temple and
held that “Devotion cannot be subjected to gender discrimination”.
• Kantaru Rajeevaru vs Indian Young Lawyers Association [review petition case]
Freedom to Manage Religious Affairs Article 26
 Article 26 provides that subject to public order, morality and
health every religious denomination or any section thereof shall
have the right:
 To establish and maintain institutions for religious and charitable
purposes.
 To manage its own affairs in matters of religion.
 To own and acquire movable and immovable property.
 To administer such property in accordance with law.
 • In SP Mittal vs Union of India 1983 Supreme Court held that
religious denominations must satisfy the following requirements:
– It must be a collection of individuals who have a system of
beliefs which they regard as conducive to their spiritual well-
being.
– It must have a common organisation.
– It must be designated by a distinctive name.
Freedom as to Payment of Taxes for Promotion of Any Particular
Religion Article 27
 Article 27 provides that no person shall be compelled to pay
taxes the proceeds of which are specifically appropriated in
payment of expenses for the promotion or maintenance of any
particular religion or religious denomination.
Freedom as to Attendance at Religious Instruction or Religious
Worship in Certain Educational Institutions Article 28
 Article 28(1) provides that no religious instruction shall be provided in any
educational institution wholly maintained out of state funds.
 Article 28(2) provides that clause (1) shall not apply to any educational
institution which is administered by the state but has been established
by any endowment or trust which requires that religious instruction shall
be imparted in such institutions.
 Article 28(3) provides that no person shall be required to take part in any
religious instruction in any educational institution recognised by state or
receiving aid out of state funds unless such person or his guardian has
given consent.

Unit-8: Secularism: Concept of Secularism-Indian Constitutional provisions

  • 1.
    Unit 8: Freedomof Religion  Constitutional Law – Articles 25 to 28  Part III: Fundamental Rights
  • 2.
    Constitutional Framework  Article25- 28 deals with the right to freedom of religion.  Provides for freedom of conscience and free profession, practice and propagation of religion.  Article 26 provides for freedom to manage religious affairs.  Article 27 provides freedom as to payment of taxes for promotion of any particular religion.  Article 28 provides for freedom as to attendance at religious instruction or religious worship in certain educational institutions.
  • 3.
    Article 25: Structureof the Provision  Article 25(1) provide that all persons are equally entitle to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practice and propagate religion. • Freedom of Conscience: it is enough freedom of an individual to mould his relationship with God in whatever manner he likes. • Freedom to Profess religion means to declare openly and freely one’s belief. • Freedom to Propagate religion means to spread and publicise the religious views.  • The right is subject to following restrictions:  Public order  Morality  Health  Other provisions of Part 3
  • 4.
     The Commissioner,Hindu Religious Endowments, Madras vs Shri Lakshmindra Tirtha Swamiyar of Shri Shirur Mutt (Shirur Mutt case) 1954 • A 7-Judge Bench of the Supreme Court held that what constitutes the essential part of a religion is primarily to be ascertained with reference to the doctrines of that religion itself. The court held that “religion” in Article 25 covers all rituals and practices that are “integral” or “essential” to a religion, but the litigants have to prove these essential features.  In Ismail Faruqui vs Union of India 1994 Supreme Court held that offer of prayer for worship is religious practice but offering at every location where such prayer can be offered would not be an essential religious practice.  Church Of God (Full Gospel) of India vs KKRMC Welfare Association 2000 Supreme Court held that no person can be allowed to create noise pollution or disturb the peace of others while exercising religious freedom. Religious prayers through loudspeakers are not an essential element of any religion.
  • 5.
    Article 25(2)  ITprovides that the state can make law for regulating or restricting economic, financial, political or other secular activities associated with religious practice and also for social welfare and reform for throwing open of Hindu religious institutions of public character to all classes and sections of Hindus.  Indian Young Lawyers Association & Ors vs State of Kerala & Ors 2018 • On 28th September 2018, the court delivered its verdict in this case by 4:1 majority which held that the practice violated the fundamental rights to equality, liberty and freedom of religion, Article 14, 15, 19(1), 21 and 25(1).  It struck down Rule 3(b) of the Kerala Hindu Places of Public Worship Act as unconstitutional. Rule 3(b) allowed for Hindu denominations to exclude women from public places of worship if the exclusion was based on custom.  • The apex court allowed entry of women of all age groups to the Sabarimala Temple and held that “Devotion cannot be subjected to gender discrimination”. • Kantaru Rajeevaru vs Indian Young Lawyers Association [review petition case]
  • 6.
    Freedom to ManageReligious Affairs Article 26  Article 26 provides that subject to public order, morality and health every religious denomination or any section thereof shall have the right:  To establish and maintain institutions for religious and charitable purposes.  To manage its own affairs in matters of religion.  To own and acquire movable and immovable property.  To administer such property in accordance with law.  • In SP Mittal vs Union of India 1983 Supreme Court held that religious denominations must satisfy the following requirements: – It must be a collection of individuals who have a system of beliefs which they regard as conducive to their spiritual well- being. – It must have a common organisation. – It must be designated by a distinctive name.
  • 7.
    Freedom as toPayment of Taxes for Promotion of Any Particular Religion Article 27  Article 27 provides that no person shall be compelled to pay taxes the proceeds of which are specifically appropriated in payment of expenses for the promotion or maintenance of any particular religion or religious denomination.
  • 8.
    Freedom as toAttendance at Religious Instruction or Religious Worship in Certain Educational Institutions Article 28  Article 28(1) provides that no religious instruction shall be provided in any educational institution wholly maintained out of state funds.  Article 28(2) provides that clause (1) shall not apply to any educational institution which is administered by the state but has been established by any endowment or trust which requires that religious instruction shall be imparted in such institutions.  Article 28(3) provides that no person shall be required to take part in any religious instruction in any educational institution recognised by state or receiving aid out of state funds unless such person or his guardian has given consent.