IPv6 deployment status: 
Where are we now and way forward 
26th April 2013, APEC TEL47, Bali, Indonesia 
Miwa Fujii <miwa@apnic.net> 
APNIC
Table of contents 
• Dissecting IPv6 adoption 
• IPv6 deployment status in the AP region 
• Way forward 
2
Dissecting IPv6 adoption 
3
Dissecting IPv6 adoption 
• The Internet consists from multi stakeholders 
– IPv6 deployment has to go through many phases in difference 
stakeholders realms 
– Need to have multi dimensional data to have a holistic view 
• We need to see IPv6 adoption density in a logical order 
1. IPv6 address allocation by Regional Internet Registries 
• IPv6 address allocation data 
2. IPv6 adoption level in the core networks (Internet transit providers) 
of the Internet 
• BGP, ASN data 
3. Content providers and enterprise to enable their website with IPv6 
• DNS server, and www reachability data 
4. Access networks that allow end users to access to IPv6 resources 
• End user IPv6 readiness data 
4
Percentage of members with both 
IPv4 and IPv6 in each RIR 
NRO data: Dec 2012 
http://www.nro.net/wp-content/uploads/NRO_Q4_2012.final_.pptx 
5
IPv6 address allocation (cumulative) 
APNIC 
http://stats.apnic.net/o3portal/index.jsp as of 7/3/2013 
50,000 
45,000 
40,000 
35,000 
30,000 
25,000 
20,000 
15,000 
10,000 
5,000 
0 
Unit: /32 
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 
6
Sum up 1: 
IPv6 address allocation 
• IPv6 address allocation has happened and is happening 
very smoothly 
7
Network with IPv6 
14000 
8000 
0 
http://bgp.potaroo.net/stats/nro/v6/ as of Jan 2013 
IPv6 BGP Table Size 
2012 – 2013: 48% YoY 
2011 – 2012: 50% YoY 
2010 12 
11 13 
8
Growth of AS nodes and links 
http://www.caida.org/publications/papers/2012/measuring_deployment_ipv6/, p2 Sept 2012 paper 
9
IPv6 adoption in Internet core 
networks 
http://6lab.cisco.com/stats/cible.php?country=world 
10
Sum up 2: 
IPv6 BGP and ASN 
• IPv6 prefix announcement into the global routing table, and 
ASNs announcing IPv6 prefixes shows healthy growth, 
especially after two World IPv6 launch events in 2011 and 
2012 
• So called Tier1 network operators shows very high level 
IPv6 readiness: we can safely say the Internet core is 
ready with IPv6 
• However, we need more work in regional and local transit 
networks 
11
IPv6 enabled DNS servers 
Sites with IPv6 Authoritative DNS Server 
www.vyncke.org/ipv6status 
IPv6 DNS server reachable 
AAAA/NS exists but unreachable 
% of site in Alexa top-50 sites 
20 
10 
0 
2010-06 
12 
2010-12 
2011-12 
2012-12
IPv6 enabled www sites 
AAAA for www.* reachable 
AAAA for alternative FQDN reachable 
% of site in Alexa top-50 sites 
7 
4 
0 
2010-06 
13 
2010-12 
2011-12 
2012-12 
www.vyncke.org/ipv6status
Sum up 3: 
Content providers and enterprises 
• 20% of DNS servers of Alexa Top50 websites are ready 
with IPv6 and the IPv6 readiness is growing 
• 6% of www servers of Alexa Top50 websites are ready with 
IPv6 
• “No content available on IPv6” is a myth 
– ISPs and network operators need to pay attention to this growth 
trend of IPv6 ready content while they are preparing their networks 
for future growth, especially their access networks 
– Do not forget about rapidly increasing Internet access from mobile 
devices (will talk more in details later) 
• Still, content providers (especially local content) and 
enterprise customers need to keep working on enabling 
IPv6 in their Internet resources 
14
IPv6 measurement 
End user readiness: World 
http://labs.apnic.net/ipv6-measurement/Regions/001%20World/ as of 07/03/2013 
15
IPv6 measurement 
End user readiness: World rankings 
16 
http://labs.apnic.net/ipv6-measurement/Economies/
Sum up: 4 
End user IPv6 readiness 
• Although the absolute number of end user IPv6 readiness 
for the world average is still quite small, the growth rate is 
robust, and there are great disparities across 
economies 
– We start observing IPv6 adopter economies with high level of IPv6 
readiness among end users 
• End users’ IPv6 readiness depends on IPv6 readiness in 
last miles – i.e., access networks 
– Local ISPs need to make an informed decision 
– Deploying NAT444 CGN without deploying IPv6 transition 
technologies does not scale the future growth 
17
IPv6 deployment status in 
the AP region 
Examples of anecdotal activities 
18
IPv6 measurement 
End user readiness: APEC 
http://labs.apnic.net/ipv6-measurement/Organizations/APEC/ 
19
IPv6 measurement 
End user readiness: World rankings 
20 
http://labs.apnic.net/ipv6-measurement/Economies/
How’s your economy doing? 
http://labs.apnic.net/ipv6-measurement/Economies/ 
21
Who are ahead in the game? 
• AS Numbers with high IPv6 ready end users 
– AS8708 RCS-RDS Cable Service Provider (Romania) 24% 
– AS12322 Free (France) 27% 
– AS2516 KDDI (Japan) 25% 
– AS18126 Chube Telecommunications (Japan) 21% 
– AS15169 Google (USA) 13% 
– AS4739 Internode (Australia) 10% 
22
APEC TEL IPv6 Guidelines in action 
• Many encouraging activities have been seen in the region 
– Updating government ICT procurement criteria with IPv6 
– Policies to support deploying IPv6 in government networks with 
clear mandate goals and timeframe 
• Leading the industry by examples in adopting IPv6 
– Partnership between public and private sectors, e.g., 
• Establishing certification mechanism to recognize “IPv6 ready” products 
• Launching IPv6 project to raise IPv6 awareness among key stakeholders 
• Promoting IPv6 activities through media, events, competitions, awards etc. 
– Human capacity development 
• Supporting IPv6 skill up trainings to the industry 
• Need to keep providing positive support to speed up 
IPv6 adoption in the region 
23
Way forward 
IPv6@APNIC 
24
APNIC’s IPv6 key messages 
• IPv6 deployment has experienced large growth in the last 
two years 
– Eight times growth in IPv6 enabled end users globally in the last 12 
months 
– IPv6 is prerequisite for ubiquitous broadband penetration, and for 
the Internet as we know it to keep growing 
– Given there is no other way to manage IPv4 address exhaustion, 
IPv6 is an ultimate solution 
– Some large network operators start seeing this fact and taking 
proactive actions by deploying IPv6 
– New networks of service providers are a good place to start 
enabling IPv6: Default IPv6 for new customers 
25
APNIC’s IPv6 key messages 
• Large Scale NAT (LSN), Carrier Grade NAT (CGN), or any 
other type of technologies to provide IPv4-to-IPv4 NAT 
platforms (AKA NAT444) are NOT a transition mechanism 
to IPv6 
– Their goal is to extend IPv4 address lifetime 
• Selection of transition technology should align with the long 
term vision of the operator 
– Less iteration to achieve such vision is better 
– Minimize iterations in order to keep lower CAPEX and OPEX 
26
Rapidly increasing mobile devices 
• The business competency of mobile network operators is 
shifting from being a traditional voice and messaging 
provider to a mobile broadband service provider 
– Services on voice, messaging and data are converging on IP based 
services 
– Rapidly increasing LTE deployment in the region 
• Given the rapid increase in the number of mobile devices, 
rich media applications and content: 
– Investing in techniques just to extend IPv4 lifetime is ultimately 
limited from a business continuity point of view 
27
IPv6 in mobile networks 
• We must avoid put the largest growth engine, i.e., use of 
mobile devices in mobile networks, in a small cage 
– Need to avoid mobile networks from being indefinitely bounded to 
IPv4 addresses (exhausting!) and being caught in fragile NATed 
networks 
– It’s not a simple growth of number of devices. These devices 
keep holding IP addresses longer and making more number of 
connections 
– IPv4 does not support today’s business needs 
• IPv6 is ready to be used in mobile networks, and it will 
save cost of network operators 
– No need to spend limited financial resources on NAT, CGN 
(NAT444) or sourcing IPv4 addresses 
28
IPv6@APNIC 
• APNIC Survey 2012 revealed collective input from the AP 
Internet community 
– “APNIC should step up efforts regarding IPv6 deployment and 
training” 
• Best current practice information on IPv6 deployment 
• Advice and consultation on IPv6 deployment 
• More practical hands-on trainings on IPv6 deployment 
• Raise awareness among stakeholders on IPv6 
• More facilitation with local Internet communities to help IPv6 uptake 
• APNIC is responding to such requests: Plans in 2013 
– More hands-on IPv6 trainings 
– Engineering assistance on IPv6 deployment 
– More community outreach on IPv6 
29
www.apnic.net/ipv6
www.apnic.net/ipv6
Thank you! 
32

IPv6 deployment status - APEC TEL47

  • 1.
    IPv6 deployment status: Where are we now and way forward 26th April 2013, APEC TEL47, Bali, Indonesia Miwa Fujii <miwa@apnic.net> APNIC
  • 2.
    Table of contents • Dissecting IPv6 adoption • IPv6 deployment status in the AP region • Way forward 2
  • 3.
  • 4.
    Dissecting IPv6 adoption • The Internet consists from multi stakeholders – IPv6 deployment has to go through many phases in difference stakeholders realms – Need to have multi dimensional data to have a holistic view • We need to see IPv6 adoption density in a logical order 1. IPv6 address allocation by Regional Internet Registries • IPv6 address allocation data 2. IPv6 adoption level in the core networks (Internet transit providers) of the Internet • BGP, ASN data 3. Content providers and enterprise to enable their website with IPv6 • DNS server, and www reachability data 4. Access networks that allow end users to access to IPv6 resources • End user IPv6 readiness data 4
  • 5.
    Percentage of memberswith both IPv4 and IPv6 in each RIR NRO data: Dec 2012 http://www.nro.net/wp-content/uploads/NRO_Q4_2012.final_.pptx 5
  • 6.
    IPv6 address allocation(cumulative) APNIC http://stats.apnic.net/o3portal/index.jsp as of 7/3/2013 50,000 45,000 40,000 35,000 30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 Unit: /32 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 6
  • 7.
    Sum up 1: IPv6 address allocation • IPv6 address allocation has happened and is happening very smoothly 7
  • 8.
    Network with IPv6 14000 8000 0 http://bgp.potaroo.net/stats/nro/v6/ as of Jan 2013 IPv6 BGP Table Size 2012 – 2013: 48% YoY 2011 – 2012: 50% YoY 2010 12 11 13 8
  • 9.
    Growth of ASnodes and links http://www.caida.org/publications/papers/2012/measuring_deployment_ipv6/, p2 Sept 2012 paper 9
  • 10.
    IPv6 adoption inInternet core networks http://6lab.cisco.com/stats/cible.php?country=world 10
  • 11.
    Sum up 2: IPv6 BGP and ASN • IPv6 prefix announcement into the global routing table, and ASNs announcing IPv6 prefixes shows healthy growth, especially after two World IPv6 launch events in 2011 and 2012 • So called Tier1 network operators shows very high level IPv6 readiness: we can safely say the Internet core is ready with IPv6 • However, we need more work in regional and local transit networks 11
  • 12.
    IPv6 enabled DNSservers Sites with IPv6 Authoritative DNS Server www.vyncke.org/ipv6status IPv6 DNS server reachable AAAA/NS exists but unreachable % of site in Alexa top-50 sites 20 10 0 2010-06 12 2010-12 2011-12 2012-12
  • 13.
    IPv6 enabled wwwsites AAAA for www.* reachable AAAA for alternative FQDN reachable % of site in Alexa top-50 sites 7 4 0 2010-06 13 2010-12 2011-12 2012-12 www.vyncke.org/ipv6status
  • 14.
    Sum up 3: Content providers and enterprises • 20% of DNS servers of Alexa Top50 websites are ready with IPv6 and the IPv6 readiness is growing • 6% of www servers of Alexa Top50 websites are ready with IPv6 • “No content available on IPv6” is a myth – ISPs and network operators need to pay attention to this growth trend of IPv6 ready content while they are preparing their networks for future growth, especially their access networks – Do not forget about rapidly increasing Internet access from mobile devices (will talk more in details later) • Still, content providers (especially local content) and enterprise customers need to keep working on enabling IPv6 in their Internet resources 14
  • 15.
    IPv6 measurement Enduser readiness: World http://labs.apnic.net/ipv6-measurement/Regions/001%20World/ as of 07/03/2013 15
  • 16.
    IPv6 measurement Enduser readiness: World rankings 16 http://labs.apnic.net/ipv6-measurement/Economies/
  • 17.
    Sum up: 4 End user IPv6 readiness • Although the absolute number of end user IPv6 readiness for the world average is still quite small, the growth rate is robust, and there are great disparities across economies – We start observing IPv6 adopter economies with high level of IPv6 readiness among end users • End users’ IPv6 readiness depends on IPv6 readiness in last miles – i.e., access networks – Local ISPs need to make an informed decision – Deploying NAT444 CGN without deploying IPv6 transition technologies does not scale the future growth 17
  • 18.
    IPv6 deployment statusin the AP region Examples of anecdotal activities 18
  • 19.
    IPv6 measurement Enduser readiness: APEC http://labs.apnic.net/ipv6-measurement/Organizations/APEC/ 19
  • 20.
    IPv6 measurement Enduser readiness: World rankings 20 http://labs.apnic.net/ipv6-measurement/Economies/
  • 21.
    How’s your economydoing? http://labs.apnic.net/ipv6-measurement/Economies/ 21
  • 22.
    Who are aheadin the game? • AS Numbers with high IPv6 ready end users – AS8708 RCS-RDS Cable Service Provider (Romania) 24% – AS12322 Free (France) 27% – AS2516 KDDI (Japan) 25% – AS18126 Chube Telecommunications (Japan) 21% – AS15169 Google (USA) 13% – AS4739 Internode (Australia) 10% 22
  • 23.
    APEC TEL IPv6Guidelines in action • Many encouraging activities have been seen in the region – Updating government ICT procurement criteria with IPv6 – Policies to support deploying IPv6 in government networks with clear mandate goals and timeframe • Leading the industry by examples in adopting IPv6 – Partnership between public and private sectors, e.g., • Establishing certification mechanism to recognize “IPv6 ready” products • Launching IPv6 project to raise IPv6 awareness among key stakeholders • Promoting IPv6 activities through media, events, competitions, awards etc. – Human capacity development • Supporting IPv6 skill up trainings to the industry • Need to keep providing positive support to speed up IPv6 adoption in the region 23
  • 24.
  • 25.
    APNIC’s IPv6 keymessages • IPv6 deployment has experienced large growth in the last two years – Eight times growth in IPv6 enabled end users globally in the last 12 months – IPv6 is prerequisite for ubiquitous broadband penetration, and for the Internet as we know it to keep growing – Given there is no other way to manage IPv4 address exhaustion, IPv6 is an ultimate solution – Some large network operators start seeing this fact and taking proactive actions by deploying IPv6 – New networks of service providers are a good place to start enabling IPv6: Default IPv6 for new customers 25
  • 26.
    APNIC’s IPv6 keymessages • Large Scale NAT (LSN), Carrier Grade NAT (CGN), or any other type of technologies to provide IPv4-to-IPv4 NAT platforms (AKA NAT444) are NOT a transition mechanism to IPv6 – Their goal is to extend IPv4 address lifetime • Selection of transition technology should align with the long term vision of the operator – Less iteration to achieve such vision is better – Minimize iterations in order to keep lower CAPEX and OPEX 26
  • 27.
    Rapidly increasing mobiledevices • The business competency of mobile network operators is shifting from being a traditional voice and messaging provider to a mobile broadband service provider – Services on voice, messaging and data are converging on IP based services – Rapidly increasing LTE deployment in the region • Given the rapid increase in the number of mobile devices, rich media applications and content: – Investing in techniques just to extend IPv4 lifetime is ultimately limited from a business continuity point of view 27
  • 28.
    IPv6 in mobilenetworks • We must avoid put the largest growth engine, i.e., use of mobile devices in mobile networks, in a small cage – Need to avoid mobile networks from being indefinitely bounded to IPv4 addresses (exhausting!) and being caught in fragile NATed networks – It’s not a simple growth of number of devices. These devices keep holding IP addresses longer and making more number of connections – IPv4 does not support today’s business needs • IPv6 is ready to be used in mobile networks, and it will save cost of network operators – No need to spend limited financial resources on NAT, CGN (NAT444) or sourcing IPv4 addresses 28
  • 29.
    IPv6@APNIC • APNICSurvey 2012 revealed collective input from the AP Internet community – “APNIC should step up efforts regarding IPv6 deployment and training” • Best current practice information on IPv6 deployment • Advice and consultation on IPv6 deployment • More practical hands-on trainings on IPv6 deployment • Raise awareness among stakeholders on IPv6 • More facilitation with local Internet communities to help IPv6 uptake • APNIC is responding to such requests: Plans in 2013 – More hands-on IPv6 trainings – Engineering assistance on IPv6 deployment – More community outreach on IPv6 29
  • 30.
  • 31.
  • 32.