A Guide to the Five Whys Technique

A Guide to the Five Whys Technique

• 1.
  The views expressedin this presentation are the views of the author/s and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Asian Development Bank, or its Board of Governors, or the governments they represent. ADB does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this presentation and accepts no responsibility for any consequence of their use. The countries listed in this presentation do not imply any view on ADB's part as to sovereignty or independent status or necessarily conform to ADB's terminology. A Guide to the Five Whys Technique Olivier Serrat 2013
• 2.
  On Cause andEffect For every effect there is a cause. Root cause analysis is the generic name of problem- solving techniques. The basic elements of root causes are materials, equipment, the man-made or natural environment, information, measurement, methods and procedures, people, management, and management systems.
• 3.
  Key Principles ofProblem-Solving Most obviously and directly, the Five Whys technique relates to the principle of systematic problem-solving. However, without the intent of the principle, the technique can only be the shell of a process. There are three key elements to the effective use of the Five Whys technique: • Accurate and complete statements of problems. • Complete honesty in answering the questions. • The determination to get to the bottom of problems and resolve them.
• 4.
  For Want ofa Nail Five is a good rule of thumb. By asking "why" five times, one can usually peel away the layers of symptoms that hide the cause of a problem. But one may also find one needs to ask "why" fewer times, or conversely more. When looking to solve a problem, it helps to begin at the end result, reflect on what caused that, and question the answer repeatedly. For want of a nail the shoe is lost; For want of a shoe the horse is lost; For want of a horse the rider is lost; For want of a rider the battle is lost; For want of a battle the kingdom is lost; And all for the want of a horseshoe nail. —George Herbert
• 5.
  A Five WhysWorksheet Why is that? Why is that? Why is that? Why is that? Why is it happening? Define the problem: Note: If the last answer is something you cannot control, go back to the previous response.
• 6.
  Teaming for FiveWhys 1. Gather a team and develop the problem statement in agreement. After this is done, decide whether or not additional individuals are needed to resolve the problem. 2. Ask the first "why" of the team: why is this or that problem taking place? There will probably be three or four sensible answers: record them all on a flip chart or whiteboard, or use index cards taped to a wall.
• 7.
  Teaming for FiveWhys 3. Ask four more successive "whys," repeating the process for every statement on the flip chart, whiteboard, or index cards. Post each answer near its "parent." Follow up on all plausible answers. You will have identified the root cause when asking "why" yields no further useful information. (If necessary, continue to ask questions beyond the arbitrary five layers to get to the root cause.) 4. Among the dozen or so answers to the last asked "why" look for systemic causes of the problem. Discuss these and settle on the most likely systemic cause. Follow the team session with a debriefing and show the product to others to confirm that they see logic in the analysis.
• 8.
  Teaming for FiveWhys 5. After settling on the most probable root cause of the problem and obtaining confirmation of the logic behind the analysis, develop appropriate corrective actions to remove the root cause from the system. The actions can (as the case demands) be undertaken by others but planning and implementation will benefit from team inputs.
• 9.
  Caveat The Five Whystechnique has been criticized as too basic a tool to analyze root causes to the depth required to ensure that the causes are fixed. The reasons for this criticism include: • The tendency of investigators to stop at symptoms, and not proceed to lower-level root causes. • The inability of investigators to cast their minds beyond current information and knowledge. • Lack of facilitation and support to help investigators ask the right questions. • The low repeat rate of results: different teams using the Five Whys technique have been known to come up with different causes for the same problem.
• 10.
  Caveat Clearly, the FiveWhys technique will suffer if it is applied through deduction only. The process articulated earlier encourages on-the-spot verification of answers to the current "why" question before proceeding to the next, and should help answer criticism as to the usefulness of the technique.
• 11.
  Further Reading • ADB.2008. The Reframing Matrix. Manila. www.adb.org/publications/reframing-matrix • ——. 2009. The Five Whys Technique. www.adb.org/publications/five-whys-technique • ——. 2009. The SCAMPER Technique. Manila. www.adb.org/publications/scamper-technique • ——. 2009. Wearing Six Thinking Hats. www.adb.org/publications/wearing-six-thinking-hats • ——. 2009. Asking Effective Questions. Manila. www.adb.org/publications/asking-effective-questions • ——. 2011. Critical Thinking. Manila. www.adb.org/publications/critical-thinking
• 12.
  Videos • ADB. 2012.The Reframing Matrix. Manila. vimeo.com/67186254 • ——. 2012. The Five Whys Technique. Manila. vimeo.com/67185517
• 13.
  Quick Response Codes @ADB @ADBSustainable Development Timeline @Academia.edu @LinkedIn @ResearchGate @Scholar @SlideShare @Twitter