How I Write an SOP That Actually Helps as a Program Manager at Amazon Most SOPs gather dust. Too long. Too vague. Too disconnected from the real work. At Amazon, a good SOP doesn’t just document a process. It makes the next person’s job easier…immediately. Here’s how I write SOPs that people actually use: 1/ I write it like a checklist, not a policy doc ↳ Clear steps ↳ Clear triggers ↳ No corporate speak Example: I once rewrote a 5-page doc into a 1-pager titled “How to Launch a New Data Feed.” Each step was 1 sentence, each had an owner. Adoption went up overnight. 2/ I start with the “when” and “why,” not just the “how” ↳ Why does this SOP exist? ↳ When should someone follow it? Example: I added a top section: “Use this when onboarding a new team to the dashboard. Purpose: prevent access issues and missed metrics.” That framing reduced questions by half. 3/ I link directly to the tools and templates ↳ No “search the wiki” ↳ Just: click → fill → done Example: Instead of “Use the onboarding tracker,” I write “Fill out this tracker → [link].” That one link removes 3 minutes of confusion. 4/ I include edge cases and common mistakes ↳ “If X happens, do Y” ↳ “Avoid this—it’s where people get stuck” Example: I once added a tip: “If permissions fail at Step 3, ping analytics-infra in Slack.” That one line prevented dozens of Slack threads. 5/ I test it with someone new ↳ If they’re confused, the SOP isn’t done ↳ Feedback closes the loop Example: I had a peer follow my SOP step-by-step, cold. Their questions helped me rewrite 4 sections before publishing. A great SOP doesn’t just live in Confluence. It lives in your team’s day-to-day execution. What’s your #1 tip for writing SOPs that actually get used?
Best Practices For Writing Company Procedures
Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.
Summary
Writing clear and actionable company procedures, also known as standard operating procedures (SOPs), is essential for ensuring tasks are completed correctly, efficiently, and consistently. By focusing on simplicity, clarity, and practical application, you can create procedures that are easy to follow and actively used by your team.
- Start with purpose: Clearly explain why the procedure exists, when it should be used, and its intended outcome to provide necessary context and reduce confusion.
- Write practical steps: Use simple language, one action per step, and format them like a checklist to avoid overwhelming users and ensure smoother execution.
- Test and refine: Have someone unfamiliar with the process follow the procedure step-by-step, and revise based on their feedback to make it foolproof and user-friendly.
-
-
If I had a dollar for every organization I've worked with where the SOPs were good, I wouldn't have a dollar. From my work with companies such as GSK, Novartis, and Pfizer, I hold that: 📋 SOPs must be functional above all else. Their purpose is to help people complete tasks successfully and safely, on time, with expected outcomes. ❌ But most SOPs fail because of: 1. Too Much Information • Every task 20+ steps • Information not concise or focused • Steps containing rationales (belongs in policy docs) • Poor titles that don't indicate task purpose Example of what NOT to do: "Please take a moment to review the testing documentation below." (It's not a favor—just write "Review the testing documentation") 2. Format & Language Issues ⚠️ • Walls of text without reading cues • No white space for visual breaks • Complex words where simple ones work ("utilize" vs "use") • Multiple actions crammed into single steps Real example of what NOT to do: "Remove one packet from the pouch and carefully add all contents to the water sample, swirl the sample until all the reagent dissolves into the solution." (That's 3 separate steps crammed into one!) 3. Structure Problems 🔍 • Steps not chronological • Sections bleeding into each other • Missing process mapping (critical for understanding flow) • Key information (like definitions) buried at the back ✅ The solution starts with three key principles: 1. Map Before Writing 🗺️Process mapping isn't optional; it's the foundation for any usable SOP (like your clinical trials, start with a protocol, not a prayer). 2. Write for Real Use ✍️One action per step, simple language (save the fluff for your cotton swabs). 3. Structure for Success 🎯Put key information where readers need it (hint: definitions belong up front, like your safety goggles). 💡 As I tell my pharma clients: "Will incorporating these concepts make your SOPs longer? Yes, sorry. Will it make them more usable? Yes, not sorry." ⚠️ Because in pharma, unusable SOPs aren't just inefficient—they're a compliance risk (or worse, accident) waiting to happen. Questions? AMA in the comments ⤵︎
-
Writing SOPs is easy. Getting people to actually use them? That’s the real challenge. If you want your processes to live and breathe inside your business, not just sit in a digital folder, here’s how to operationalize them: Start with reality, not theory Don’t aim for the perfect process. Document what’s actually happening today, then improve from there. Break it down into roles Every SOP should answer: Who does what, when, and with what tools. If multiple people are involved, use a RACI matrix to align your team. Turn SOPs Into Checklists A checklist is what the team uses in real life. It should follow the flow of the SOP but be actionable, step-by-step, clear, and tied to the tools they use daily. Embed it where work happens If your team uses project management software, embed the checklist there. If they work from tablets in the field, build it into a form or app they already use. Don’t make them go hunting for the process. Train it. Review it. Reinforce It. Introduce it in a team meeting. Use real-world scenarios. Check in weekly or monthly to ask: → Is it being used? → What’s unclear? → Has anything changed? SOPs don’t create structure. Using them does.