If you’re a UX researcher curious about what Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) can actually do for your work, you’re in the right place. Let’s say you’re working on a grocery planning app. Users enter ingredients they have, and the app recommends recipes. Now you want to understand how to make that experience better. You might have some intuitive ideas: maybe if the app is easy to use, the personalization feels stronger. If personalization improves, satisfaction goes up. And when users are satisfied, they’re more likely to stick around. But how do you test that whole chain of relationships at once? That’s exactly what SEM is built for. So what is SEM? It’s a statistical framework that helps you test how different aspects of a user’s experience are linked - simultaneously. Unlike traditional methods that analyze one relationship at a time, SEM lets you look at the full picture, including both visible data (like task success or ratings) and hidden concepts (like trust or satisfaction). These hidden concepts are called latent variables. You don’t measure them directly, you estimate them through things like survey questions. For example, satisfaction might be reflected in responses like “I enjoy using this app” or “This app meets my needs.” SEM is especially helpful because UX is never just one thing. Users’ feelings and behaviors are shaped by a web of interconnected elements like ease of use, trust, enjoyment, and perceived usefulness. If you want to know what really drives continued use, you need to model the whole system, not just isolated parts. This kind of modeling lets you go beyond surface-level stats. You can separate the things you observe (like a 1-5 star rating) from the psychological constructs you care about (like satisfaction). You can also identify which features influence others indirectly, such as how ease of use might boost satisfaction by first improving personalization. You can even account for measurement error and compare different user groups, like first-time users versus power users. Let’s bring it back to our grocery app. You might collect data on how easy users find the app to navigate, how personalized the recommendations feel, how satisfied they are overall, and whether they intend to keep using it. SEM lets you test how each of those pieces fits together. The results might show that ease of use drives personalization, which increases satisfaction, which in turn predicts continued use. It’s a roadmap for product decisions. If you’re new to SEM, don’t worry. Start by learning the basics of regression and factor analysis. From there, tools like AMOS (great for visual modeling) or R’s lavaan package (great if you like code) can take you further. Two great books for getting started are Barbara Byrne’s Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS and Rex Kline’s Principles and Practice of SEM.
Utilizing Data Analytics to Improve B2B UX
Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.
Summary
Utilizing data analytics to improve B2B user experience (UX) involves leveraging data to understand user behavior, refine products, and create seamless, impactful interactions. This process ensures that data-driven insights fuel strategies to meet user needs and achieve business goals.
- Map user behavior: Analyze user actions on your platform to uncover patterns and identify obstacles, helping enhance navigation and overall satisfaction.
- Incorporate user feedback: Develop interfaces that not only encourage usage but also allow users to share their insights, creating continuous feedback loops for product improvement.
- Align data with goals: Use analytics to connect UX metrics like click-through rates and completed actions with broader business objectives, ensuring measurable outcomes.
-
-
Data doesn’t have to define your design process. But failing to use it is a big mistake. In our process, we use data from the beginning to draw inspiration, then use data to guide our prototyping decisions, and eventually make more data-driven choices. The process is more flexible than people often think. The goal isn’t to use data–it’s to make more informed decisions that ultimately improve user and business outcomes. Here’s how: → Data-Inspired Design (Frame the Challenge) We use data to inspire and shape our understanding of the design problem. The aim is to find insights that lead to creative solutions while considering what users need, how they behave, and why they act in specific ways. We find up to 100 opportunities to create lift in a design initiative. Helio UX metrics help us gather early user feedback or signals, highlighting where users struggle or where new opportunities lie. We can set a clear direction for the design process by using these early insights and proxy metrics. We also do interviews. Our team focuses on collecting these early signals to understand the reasons behind user actions. → Data-Informed Design (Assess the Potential) We weigh the benefits and risks of different ideas. Data helps guide the design process, but intuition and insights are just as important as measurable factors. In more significant engagements, we collect answers from up to 30,000 participants in this phase. Helio is handy here, as it allows teams to test early prototypes on a large scale, gathering UX metrics crucial for evaluating design choices. Data storytelling and analyzing user research turn insights into practical feedback. Collaboration across teams also ensures that the design meets user and business needs. We gather feedback through usability tests and measure task completion rates, helping link early design ideas to clear success criteria. → Data-Driven Design (Finalize the Choices) Data helps us make decisions that align with business and user goals. The focus is refining the design using feedback and data to make it as effective as possible. Once the design is live, we connect early metrics with analytics. Helio helps us collect data, such as success rates, user satisfaction, and task completion. These figures provide the confidence needed to finalize design decisions. We align UX metrics with business goals, focusing on clear outcomes like improved usability, higher feature adoption, or revenue growth. Design KPIs and early signals play a role, guiding us in making final decisions based on how well the product performs against these success metrics. —–––––– Data can be applied differently throughout the design process—from an initial source of inspiration to a guiding force in assessing potential and ultimately as the driver of final decisions. We use data differently in each design phase, balancing creativity and analysis. Interested? DM me. #productdesign #productdiscovery #userresearch #uxresearch
-
Data Products are NOT all code, infra, and biz data. Even from a PURE technical POV, a Data Product must also have the ability to capture HUMAN Feedback. The User’s insight is technically part of the product and defines 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐃𝐚𝐭𝐚 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐝𝐮𝐜𝐭’𝐬 𝐟𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐞 & shape. This implies Human Action is an integrated part of the Data Product, and it turns out 𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐢𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐫𝐲 𝐛𝐮𝐢𝐥𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐛𝐥𝐨𝐜𝐤 𝐨𝐟 𝐟𝐞𝐞𝐝𝐛𝐚𝐜𝐤. How the user interacts with the product influences how the product develops. But what is the 𝐛𝐫𝐢𝐝𝐠𝐞 𝐛/𝐰 𝐃𝐚𝐭𝐚 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐝𝐮𝐜𝐭𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐇𝐮𝐦𝐚𝐧 𝐀𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬? It’s a 𝐆𝐎𝐎𝐃 𝐔𝐬𝐞𝐫 𝐈𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐟𝐚𝐜𝐞 that doesn’t just offer a read-only experience like dashboards (no action or way to capture action), but enables the user to interact actively. This bridge is entirely a user-experience (UX) problem. With the goal of how to enhance the User's Experience that encourages action, the interface/bridge between Data Products and Human Action must address the following: 𝐇𝐨𝐰 𝐭𝐨 𝐟𝐢𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐫𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭 𝐝𝐚𝐭𝐚 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐝𝐮𝐜𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐬𝐞𝐫𝐯𝐞𝐬 𝐦𝐲 𝐧𝐞𝐞𝐝? A discovery problem addressed by UX features such as natural language search (contextual search), browsing, & product exploration features. 𝐇𝐨𝐰 𝐜𝐚𝐧 𝐈 𝐮𝐬𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐝𝐮𝐜𝐭? An accessibility problem addressed by UX features such as native integrability- interoperability with native stacks, policy granularity (and scalable management of granules), documentation, and lineage transparency. 𝐇𝐨𝐰 𝐜𝐚𝐧 𝐈 𝐮𝐬𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐝𝐮𝐜𝐭 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐟𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞? A more deep-rooted accessibility problem. You can't use data you don't trust. Addressed by UX features such as quality/SLO overview & lineage (think contracts), downstream updates & request channels. Note that it's the data product that's enabling quality but the UI that's exposing trust features. 𝐇𝐨𝐰 𝐜𝐚𝐧 𝐈 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐜𝐭 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐝𝐮𝐜𝐭 & 𝐬𝐮𝐠𝐠𝐞𝐬𝐭 𝐧𝐞𝐰 𝐫𝐞𝐪𝐮𝐢𝐫𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬? A data evolution problem. Addressed by UX features such as logical modelling interface, easily operable by both adept and non-technical data users. 𝐇𝐨𝐰 𝐭𝐨 𝐠𝐞𝐭 𝐚𝐧 𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐯𝐢𝐞𝐰 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐠𝐨𝐚𝐥𝐬 𝐈’𝐦 𝐟𝐮𝐥𝐟𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐝𝐮𝐜𝐭? A measurement/attribution problem. Addressed by UX features such as global and local metrics trees. ...and so on. You get the picture. Note that not only the active user suggestions but also the user’s usage patterns are recorded, acting as active feedback for data product dev and managers. This UI is like a product hub for users to actively discover, understand, and leverage data products while passively enabling product development at the same time through consistent 𝐟𝐞𝐞𝐝𝐛𝐚𝐜𝐤 𝐥𝐨𝐨𝐩𝐬 𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐚𝐠𝐞𝐝 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐟𝐞𝐝 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐨 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐩𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐝𝐚𝐭𝐚 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐝𝐮𝐜𝐭𝐬 by the UI. How have you been solving the UX for your Data Products?
-
This might be controversial, but... Most B2B websites are terrible at turning traffic into pipeline. A founder friend asked me this week: “Bill, we’ve got traffic and a decent funnel, but no pipeline from the site. No clue what’s wrong.” You spend all this money to drive traffic… And when buyers land on your site? They fall into the void. ❌ No clue who’s visiting ❌ No idea what accounts matter ❌ No signals, no triggers, no system I have seen this happen more often than you'd think. Here's the issue 👇 When someone hits your site → that’s a signal. Your site should behave like a rep: → Recognize the buyer → Know what they care about → Guide the next step The tools make it possible. But without a system? They’re simply just bloat. That's why this convo hit a nerve, because I see this everywhere, Teams drive traffic, buyers show intent, But the website is just… watching. This is the gap between inbound and Outbound, And it’s exactly what our inbound-led Outbound model solves. At SalesCaptain, we’ve helped 60+ GTM teams turn their websites on offense: → Identify who’s visiting → Filter for ICP → Trigger Outbound and retargeting in real time Here’s the 6-step flow and stack that powers it👇 🔹 1. Identify who’s visiting Uncover high-intent accounts in real time → RB2B, Dealfront, Leadfeeder, Clearbit Reveal → Pipe into Clay to filter ICP + enrich with real-time signals 🔹 2. Capture and convert leads Turn visits into qualified conversations → Self-serve: Chili Piper, Calendly, Typeform, VideoAsk → Personalized: Mutiny, Lift AI, Userled, Clay + Webflow integration 🔹 3. Watch what’s working Understand user behavior + optimize UX → Observe: Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar | by Contentsquare, Fullstory → Test: VWO, Convert Experiences 🔹 4. Build trust while they browse Social proof drives conversion → Testimonial, Senja, review badges from G2, Capterra 🔹 5. Trigger outbound + ads Act on intent with unified data → Outbound ops: Clay, Apollo, Outreach, Salesloft → Data + retargeting: Twilio Segment, RudderStack, LinkedIn Matched Audiences, Meta Custom Audiences 🔹 6. Track what’s actually working Attribution that ties to pipeline → Dreamdata, HockeyStack, HubSpot Modern GTM isn’t about inbound vs outbound It’s about building a system that drives pipeline. 👇 Want help mapping this to your GTM? Comment below or DM me, we’ll show you how we do it at SalesCaptain. #gtmstrategy #outbound #conversionrate #revops #b2bgrowth