Tips for Mitigating Cloud Vulnerabilities

Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.

Summary

The concept of "tips-for-mitigating-cloud-vulnerabilities" refers to strategies and practices designed to reduce security risks in cloud environments. These measures aim to protect sensitive data, ensure access control, and manage potential threats effectively.

  • Implement robust access controls: Enforce least-privilege policies for all accounts and regularly audit permissions to prevent unauthorized access and minimize potential breaches.
  • Monitor and update regularly: Continuously scan for vulnerabilities, apply security patches, and review configurations to ensure your cloud environment remains secure against evolving threats.
  • Segregate and secure data: Use encryption and data segmentation to protect sensitive information, and ensure legacy systems or storage are either updated or securely decommissioned.
Summarized by AI based on LinkedIn member posts
  • View profile for Supro Ghose

    CIO | CISO | Cybersecurity & Risk Leader | Federal & Financial Services | Cloud & AI Security | NIST CSF/RMF | Board Reporting | Digital Transformation | GenAI Governance | Banking & Regulatory Ops

    14,658 followers

    𝗢𝗳𝗳𝗶𝗰𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗖𝗼𝗺𝗽𝘁𝗿𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗿 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗖𝘂𝗿𝗿𝗲𝗻𝗰𝘆 (𝗢𝗖𝗖) suffered a recent cloud email breach, that highlighted critical vulnerabilities in email security and access management that have broader implications for all federally regulated institutions. 𝚂̲𝚞̲𝚖̲𝚖̲𝚊̲𝚛̲𝚢̲ ̲𝚘̲𝚏̲ ̲𝚝̲𝚑̲𝚎̲ ̲𝙾̲𝙲̲𝙲̲ ̲𝙱̲𝚛̲𝚎̲𝚊̲𝚌̲𝚑̲ ̲An attacker gained unauthorized access to a privileged administrative email account within the Microsoft environment. The breach went undetected for 8 months, during which sensitive government communications were silently exfiltrated. More than 150K email messages were compromised, affecting around 100 officials. The incident exposed critical shortcomings in access control enforcement, monitoring, and response protocols. 𝙺̲𝚎̲𝚢̲ ̲𝙵̲𝚊̲𝚒̲𝚕̲𝚞̲𝚛̲𝚎̲𝚜̲ ̲𝙸̲𝚍̲𝚎̲𝚗̲𝚝̲𝚒̲𝚏̲𝚒̲𝚎̲𝚍̲ 1. Overprivileged Access – An administrative account with wide mailbox visibility was compromised, facilitating prolonged data exfiltration. 2. Delayed Detection – Anomalous behavior went unnoticed for months, raising concerns about the efficacy of real-time monitoring and alerting. 3. Stale and Unlocked Service Accounts: There were no policies in place for password rotation, inactivity lockout, or login attempt lockout for service accounts, making them vulnerable to brute-force or credential stuffing attacks. 4. Unaddressed Internal Warnings – Known risks flagged in prior audits related to email and access security had not been remediated in time. 5. Insufficient Conditional Access Policy Enforcement – The compromised account, linked to Azure, bypassed MFA and geo restrictions due to a poorly enforced conditional access framework. VPN usage further masked malicious activity.   𝙻̲𝚎̲𝚜̲𝚜̲𝚘̲𝚗̲ ̲𝚕̲𝚎̲𝚊̲𝚛̲𝚗̲𝚎̲𝚍̲:̲ 1. Enforce Microsoft Conditional Access Policies – Ensure all accounts, including service accounts, are subject to robust Conditional Access, MFA, and geo-restrictions. 2. Tighten Access Control – Limit and monitor privileges of administrative and service accounts; apply just-in-time access models. 3. Audit and Harden Service Accounts – Eliminate hardcoded credentials, enforce regular password rotation, enable account lockouts after failed login attempts, and setinactivity thresholds. 4. Strengthen Detection – Invest in behavioral analytics, adaptive authentication, and cloud-native threat detection tools. 5. Review and Limit Privileges – Conduct a review of privileged accounts and implement RBAC and JIT access where possible. 6. Ensure compliance with secure baseline configurations like those in DHS CISA BOD 25-01 - Secure Cloud Baseline [SCuBA] (stated in OCC response) The 𝗢𝗖𝗖 𝗯𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗰𝗵 is a cautionary tale—reactive controls alone are insufficient in today’s environment. Proactive hardening of identity, access, and cloud email infrastructure must be a top priority. https://lnkd.in/ef_4DQ3V

  • View profile for Charles Garrett

    Understand your adversary, automate the defense.

    3,616 followers

    🚨 Securing Azure Entra ID: Proactive Defense Against Discovery Tactics 🚨 Discovery tactics in Azure Entra ID environments (TA0007) give attackers the roadmap they need for lateral movement, privilege escalation, and exfiltration. But awareness empowers action. Let’s dive into how you can mitigate these threats: 1️⃣ Account Discovery (T1087): Mitigate unauthorized Entra ID account enumeration. Restrict commands like Get-AzADUser and enforce least-privilege access. 2️⃣ Cloud Service Discovery (T1526): Disable unused Azure services to reduce the attack surface. Monitor commands like az resource list --output table and set alerts. 3️⃣ Password Policy Discovery (T1201): Enable strong password policies using banned password lists. Use Smart Lockout to block brute-force attempts. Monitor Entra audit logs for password policy changes and set alerts. 4️⃣ Permission Groups Discovery (T1069): Restrict group enumeration permissions to essential roles only. Use Privileged Identity Management (PIM) for critical groups like Global Administrators. Monitor changes to group memberships via Azure Monitor or Microsoft Sentinel. 5️⃣ Cloud Groups Enumeration (T1069.003): Regularly review sensitive group access and enforce JIT access for administrative roles using PIM. Monitor commands such as az ad group list and az ad group member list. 💡 Key takeaway: Proactive steps like disabling unused services, enforcing least privilege, and implementing robust monitoring can significantly reduce your attack surface. 🔑 Do you know of any other ways to fortify your Azure defenses? 🏰 Share your thoughts and strategies below! #AzureSecurity #CyberSecurity #CloudDefense

  • View profile for Confidence Staveley
    Confidence Staveley Confidence Staveley is an Influencer

    Multi-Award Winning Cybersecurity Leader | Author | Int'l Speaker | On a mission to simplify cybersecurity and raise 250 million high-agency humans who take ownership, defy odds, and change the world.

    94,707 followers

    Using unverified container images, over-permissioning service accounts, postponing network policy implementation, skipping regular image scans and running everything on default namespaces…. What do all these have in common ? Bad cybersecurity practices! It’s best to always do this instead; 1. Only use verified images, and scan them for vulnerabilities before deploying them in a Kubernetes cluster. 2. Assign the least amount of privilege required. Use tools like Open Policy Agent (OPA) and Kubernetes' native RBAC policies to define and enforce strict access controls. Avoid using the cluster-admin role unless absolutely necessary. 3. Network Policies should be implemented from the start to limit which pods can communicate with one another. This can prevent unauthorized access and reduce the impact of a potential breach. 4. Automate regular image scanning using tools integrated into the CI/CD pipeline to ensure that images are always up-to-date and free of known vulnerabilities before being deployed. 5. Always organize workloads into namespaces based on their function, environment (e.g., dev, staging, production), or team ownership. This helps in managing resources, applying security policies, and isolating workloads effectively. PS: If necessary, you can ask me in the comment section specific questions on why these bad practices are a problem. #cybersecurity #informationsecurity #softwareengineering

  • View profile for Jeremy Wallace

    Microsoft MVP 🏆| MCT🔥| Nerdio NVP | Microsoft Azure Certified Solutions Architect Expert | Principal Cloud Architect 👨💼 | Helping you to understand the Microsoft Cloud! | Deepen your knowledge - Follow me! 😁

    8,846 followers

    👉 🔒 5 Steps To Secure Your Azure Cloud Connection 🔒 When securing your Azure cloud infrastructure, following best practices can significantly reduce your attack surface. Here are five key steps to enhance your security posture and protect your environment from unauthorized access. 🌐💡 🔑 Step ①: Avoid Public IP Exposure One of the most common security missteps is exposing Virtual Machines (VMs) directly to the internet via public IPs. Instead: ✅ Use Azure Bastion for secure, browser-based access to your VMs without exposing RDP/SSH. ✅ Deploy Azure Firewall, Private Endpoints, or VPN Gateways to control external access. ✅ Leverage DDoS protection to defend against large-scale attacks. 🔄 Step ②: Bastion NSG Rules – Lock It Down! By default, Azure Bastion allows connections to VMs using port 443 (TLS/SSL). However, configuring Network Security Groups (NSGs) correctly ensures your network remains secure: 🔹 Restrict inbound/outbound traffic to only essential services. 🔹 Ensure that Bastion subnets don’t allow inbound internet traffic except from trusted sources. 🔹 Audit NSG rules regularly for compliance and best practices. 🔐 Step ③: Principle of Least Privilege (PoLP) for Permissions Proper role-based access control (RBAC) ensures users only have the permissions they truly need: 🚫 Avoid granting Contributor or Owner access to unnecessary users. 🔹 Use role assignments like Virtual Machine Reader and Network Card Reader for limited access. 🔹 Regularly review Azure AD Privileged Identity Management (PIM) to enforce Just-In-Time (JIT) role elevation. 🚪 Step ④: Port Control – Don't Use Default Ports! Hackers scan well-known ports like 3389 (RDP) and 22 (SSH) to exploit vulnerabilities. Reduce risk by: ✅ Using Bastion tunneling instead of exposing these ports directly. ✅ Enforcing Azure Defender for Servers to detect unusual port activity. ✅ Implementing host-based firewalls to limit allowed IPs. ⏱️ Step ⑤: Just-In-Time (JIT) Access + Bastion = Secure Remote Connectivity To prevent always-open attack surfaces, Just-In-Time VM Access (JIT) helps: ⏳ Opening ports only when explicitly needed for a limited time. 🔑 Combining JIT with Bastion ensures zero-trust access principles are applied. 🛑 Reducing the window for potential brute-force attacks or unauthorized access attempts. 🚀 By implementing these best practices, your Azure environment will be more secure and resilient against threats while maintaining productivity. #CloudSecurity #Azure #Bastion #Cybersecurity #ITManagement #AzureNetworking #AzureSecurity #DataProtection #MicrosoftAzure #CloudComputing #TechTips #AzureTips #AzureTipOfTheDay #MicrosoftCloud

  • View profile for Jaden Turner

    CTO-CIO-CISO. Proven Disruptor Transforming Tech for over a Decade.Queen of QA - Mentor Capitalist - CybSecurity Savant @QueenofQA

    12,662 followers

    Big Three (AWS, Azure, Google Cloud) consolidating control over security, data, and AI, I’d build a multi-layered security plan that assumes: 1. Cloud providers are not trustworthy. 2. AI-driven security enforcement will be used to restrict access to data. 3. Companies must take back control of their infrastructure or risk losing everything. Ultimate Security Plan to Prevent a Cloud Takeover 1. Infrastructure Control – Get Off Their Grid Hybrid or On-Prem Strategy: Companies must move critical IP and customer data off the Big Three’s cloud. Decentralized Compute & Storage: Leverage self-hosted AI models instead of API-based LLMs. Use alternative cloud providers (e.g., Linode, DigitalOcean, Vultr) for redundancy. Implement private storage solutions (e.g., MinIO, Ceph) to avoid S3 dependency. Data Fragmentation: Encrypt and distribute sensitive data across multiple storage locations, so no single provider has the full picture. 2. Security at the Data Layer – Assume They’ll Try to Take It End-to-End Encryption (E2EE): Encrypt data before it touches cloud storage—providers should only see ciphertext. Use self-hosted key management systems (KMS) instead of AWS/Azure KMS. Zero Trust Data Architecture: No cloud provider gets full access—data is split, sharded, and stored separately. Confidential computing (e.g., Intel SGX, AMD SEV) they can’t decrypt anything. Automated Data Poisoning Defense: Implement honeypots and monitor to detect if AI is being trained on data w/out permission. 3. AI Security – Prevent LLM Takeover Self-Hosted LLMs: Train- run proprietary AI models in-house avoid dependency on OpenAI, Google, AWS models. Poison Their Models: Deploy decoy data that triggers hallucinations in unauthorized AI training attempts. Identify patterns in data scraping attempts and dynamically alter responses. Red Team Their AI If AI security policies are being enforced against you, develop adversarial attacks to force model errors and expose flaws in their enforcement. 4. Operational Security (OpSec) – No Easy Entry Points Network Segmentation & Isolation: Treat cloud infrastructure as a hostile environment and limit cloud-to-internal connections. Air-Gapped Backups: Maintain offline, physically secured copies of critical data in case of cloud lockout. Multi-Cloud Obfuscation: Deploy services across multiple cloud providers with rotating endpoints to prevent surveillance and shutdowns. 5. Legal & Strategic Countermeasures Regulatory Pressure: Push for laws that force cloud providers to separate AI enforcement from cloud security. Public Exposure: Document and expose cloud misconfigurations and breaches to prove they are unfit to control security. Economic Leverage: Encourage mass exodus from centralized cloud providers—they’ll only stop if their revenue is threatened. Don’t Play Defense—Go on the Offensive The strategy isn’t just about protecting data—it’s about breaking Big Tech’s monopoly before they enforce total control.

  • View profile for Spandana Nakka

    CEO at Pump.co | Save ~60% on cloud for free!

    48,398 followers

    One misconfigured Firebase bucket was all it took to cause the most famous data breach of the year. A researcher opened Tea’s iOS app, watched the network traffic and found an unauthenticated Firebase storage bucket. Within hours, Internet forum users cloned the entire archive: 13,000 verification selfies and IDs from a legacy system Tea hadn’t locked down. And then, a second, separate leak surfaced! A public database exposed over 1.1 million direct messages, some sent as recently as last week. Tea yanked the DM feature offline, but only after screenshots spread across social channels. Now, two class‑action lawsuits accuse Tea of negligence, demand data encryption and a mandatory purge of the leaked content. Scary stuff. What you can learn from this: 1. Make sure you lock every bucket: require authentication, block public ACLs in CI and alert on any anonymous read 2. Purge zombie infrastructure often: delete or cold‑archive “legacy” storage before it becomes a headline like this 3. Assume scrapers move faster than your reaction: if you're counting on moving fast after you're notified, it's already too late. Cloud resources are not secure just because they're on AWS, or GCP, or any enterprise platform. You own your risk. Make sure you're lowering it as much as possible.

Explore categories