“We lost 2,000 customer notifications… and no one noticed.” It happened during a routine deployment. The system was running fine or so we thought. Our microservice processed user signups. Once a user registered, it was supposed to: 1. Save the user to the database 2. Send a welcome email via Kafka But one day… Kafka was down. The database saved the user. The event? Lost. No retry. No backup. No alert. 2,000 users onboarded. 0 welcome emails sent. And worse no one knew until days later when support tickets piled up. That’s when we discovered the Outbox Pattern. Here’s what it does: * Step 1: Save the event in an outbox table inside the same transaction as your data. * Step 2: A separate background job reads from the outbox and reliably sends the event. * Step 3: Once sent, the event is marked as “processed.” No more race conditions. No more lost messages. Atomicity. Reliability. Peace of mind Today, we ship every event with confidence — even if Kafka is down, the system recovers. Lessons Learned: * Async messaging isn’t “fire and forget.” * Always make your writes and events part of a single unit of work. * Patterns like Outbox + CDC (Change Data Capture) are critical in microservice architecture. Follow me for real-world dev stories, patterns, and system design tips you’ll actually use. #Microservices #Java #SpringBoot #Kafka #SystemDesign #EngineeringLeadership
Background processing for email notifications
Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.
Summary
Background processing for email notifications refers to the practice of handling the sending of emails behind the scenes, rather than making users wait for emails to be sent during their main interaction. This approach helps ensure reliability, scalability, and smoother user experiences when systems need to send notifications—especially in bulk or during high-traffic times.
- Use reliable patterns: Consider implementing solutions like the Outbox pattern and message queues to prevent lost messages and keep workflows atomic.
- Automate and schedule: Set up background jobs or batch processing to handle large volumes of notification emails on a schedule, reducing manual work and system overload.
- Monitor and retry: Keep an eye on email processing logs and set up automatic retries for failed sends so no notifications are missed.
-
-
🔔 Imagine you're using an e-commerce app that sends you notifications about your order status—order placed, packed, shipped, and delivered. These notifications need to be sent in sequence without overwhelming the system. How does the app manage this efficiently? If the app tried to send notifications directly every time an update happened, the system could get overloaded, especially during high traffic. What if thousands of users placed orders at once? Directly processing all notifications would slow everything down. ✉️ This is where Message Queues come in. A Message Queue acts as a buffer between tasks that produce messages (like order updates) and tasks that consume messages (like sending notifications). It ensures that messages are processed one by one without overwhelming the system. BullMQ + Redis is a popular message queue solution in Node.js. BullMQ stores messages in Redis, a fast in-memory database. When a new task arrives, it's added to the queue in Redis. Workers pick up tasks from the queue and process them asynchronously without blocking other operations. 🐂 With BullMQ, you can schedule tasks, retry failed jobs, and even prioritize important messages. Redis ensures that messages are stored temporarily and processed reliably. This combination makes sure that notifications are delivered without delays or data loss. Message queues like BullMQ + Redis are widely used in apps for email notifications, payment processing, video encoding, and data pipelines. They improve performance, scalability, and reliability in distributed systems. ✨ If you're building systems that need background jobs, task scheduling, or load management, message queues are a must-have.
-
🚀 Day 30: Email Notifications with Spring Boot Batch Let’s talk about automating email notifications with Spring Boot Batch—a robust solution for handling bulk emails efficiently and reliably! 📧 🔍 Why Use Spring Batch for Email Notifications? Spring Batch simplifies sending large volumes of emails (e.g., newsletters, reports) with: ✅ Efficiency: Processes emails in chunks to avoid overload. ✅ Reliability: Handles failures gracefully with retries. ✅ Scalability: Perfect for managing large user bases. 💡 Core Concepts in Spring Batch for Email Notifications - 👓 Reader: Fetches data (e.g., user email IDs) from a database. Example: Query users who subscribed to weekly newsletters. - 🛠 Processor: Personalizes email content (e.g., "Hi, [Name]!"). - 📤 Writer: Sends processed emails via SMTP or APIs (e.g., AWS SES). - ⏰ Scheduler: Automates when the job runs (e.g., every Monday at 9 AM). 🔄 How It Works -> Data Fetching: Retrieve 10,000 user emails with a database query. -> Chunk Processing: Divide into smaller batches (e.g., 100 emails per batch). -> Retry on Failure: Handles invalid emails or server issues without stopping the job. -> Monitoring: Track sent emails and failures using logs and reports. 📋 Example Workflow - Reader: Query subscribed users from the database. - Processor: Personalize each email with user data. - Writer: Send emails in batches using a service like AWS SES. - Scheduler: Use cron to schedule weekly notifications. ✨ Why It’s Awesome : Automating email notifications with Spring Boot Batch transforms a tedious, error-prone process into an efficient, scalable, and fault-tolerant solution. Whether you're sending newsletters, promotional emails, or reminders, Spring Batch ensures reliability and precision at every step. Let’s keep building smarter solutions, one step at a time! 🚀 Follow Muni Kumar Sana for more ....... ! #SpringBoot #JavaLearning #EmailAutomation
-
Here’s where things break. You save a user to the database. Then you send a welcome email. Then you publish a message to another service. Three separate operations. Any one of them can fail. Now your system is in a weird state: • The user is saved, but the email never went out • Or the message didn’t get published • Or you retried and did everything twice It gets messy. Fast. The Outbox pattern helps you avoid this. Here’s how it works: 1. Start a transaction 2. Save the user 3. Insert the email and message into an Outbox table 4. Commit the transaction A background service later picks up those outbox entries and processes them reliably. Now all three steps succeed together. Or none of them do. Your database writes are atomic. No reason your workflows shouldn't be atomic either. Here’s a guide that goes deeper: https://lnkd.in/evvYuYpq Have you tried this pattern before?
-
Why you should never send emails in the HTTP request lifecycle? 1. User signs up -> backend creates the account. 2. The backend waits 5 seconds because it's sending a confirmation email before responding. 3. Sending emails is slow due to SMTP latency and potential retries. 4. This leads to poor user experience or even server errors (e.g., 500s). A Better Approach: Use Background Jobs 1. Store the user in the database. 2. Push the email task to a background job queue. 3. Return the response to the user immediately "Account created successfully". 4. Background worker listens for the job, sends the email, and retries on failure. Some best practices 1. Make email jobs idempotent (safe to retry). 2. Add monitoring and alerting for your background job queues. 3. Use a reliable transactional email service (SendGrid, SES, Mailgun). --- ♻️ Share so more people can learn ➕ Follow Jatin Kumar for more #SoftwareEngineering #Programming #Coding #Tech #API #SystemDesign