How I Balance Speed and Quality as a Program Manager at Amazon Speed and quality aren’t opposites—they’re complements. Early in my career, I thought moving fast meant sacrificing quality. Then I noticed how a senior PM delivered projects quickly without compromising on standards by using clear frameworks and decision-making principles. That realization changed my approach entirely. Here’s how I balance speed and quality effectively: 1️⃣ Define ‘Good Enough’ Early I set clear quality thresholds before starting a project—what ‘good enough’ looks like and what we’re willing to trade off to meet deadlines. This clarity prevents scope creep and maintains quality standards. 2️⃣ Build in Quality Gates I establish quality checkpoints at critical milestones, not just at the end of the project. These gates allow us to catch issues early and course-correct without impacting the timeline significantly. 3️⃣ Iterate, Don’t Perfect I focus on delivering MVPs (Minimum Viable Products) and iterating based on feedback rather than aiming for perfection from the start. This approach has cut delivery times by 20% on average while still meeting quality benchmarks. Balancing speed and quality isn’t about choosing one over the other—it’s about finding the right blend. If you’re struggling to balance both, try focusing less on perfection and more on progress. How do you balance speed and quality? #ProjectManagement #SpeedVsQuality #Leadership #Amazon
Evaluating the Balance Between Speed and Quality in Workflows
Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.
Summary
Striking the balance between speed and quality in workflows means finding ways to meet deadlines without compromising on performance or reliability. This approach ensures progress while maintaining standards that deliver meaningful outcomes.
- Define quality thresholds: Set clear standards for what “good enough” looks like early in the process to keep projects focused and avoid unnecessary delays.
- Incorporate checkpoints: Build quality checks into key milestones to catch issues early and make adjustments without disrupting timelines.
- Focus on iterative progress: Prioritize delivering smaller, functional outputs and refining them over time rather than striving for perfection upfront.
-
-
"Slow Down to Speed Up" – Balancing Velocity and Quality in Experimentation I’m working on a program with some QA/QC issues right now. We’ve been pushing velocity hard—really focusing on getting experiments out fast. But now it’s time to step back and reset. This happens, and it should be expected. When you’re scaling an experimentation program, it’s easy to fall into the velocity trap: rushing to ship more tests without maintaining the foundation that makes them meaningful and reliable. But here’s the thing—scaling doesn’t mean choosing between velocity and quality. It means building a system that lets you do both. Here’s how I’m stepping back to speed up: >> Refining Processes Without Creating Bottlenecks: Processes should enable speed, not slow it down. We're revisiting our workflows to ensure they support velocity while maintaining rigor—standardized, yet flexible. >> Prioritizing High-Impact Testing: Not all experiments are worth the rush. By tying experiments to KPIs and business goals, we’re focusing our resources on what truly matters, not just what’s easy to test. >> Fixing Gaps in Skills and Knowledge: When teams are pushed too hard, QA issues pop up. Auditing capabilities and addressing weak spots—whether through training, hiring, or collaboration—is key to avoiding slowdowns later. >> Rethinking Rituals to Build Collaboration: Velocity often isolates teams into silos which breeds mis-alignment. Regular reviews, cross-team standups, and shared insights can keep the momentum strong while ensuring consistency across the program. >> Optimizing Tools with XOS: An Experimentation Operating System (XOS) is helping us integrate tools, automate repetitive tasks, and give teams the resources they need to move fast without cutting corners. #systemsthinking Sometimes, scaling means pushing hard. Other times, it’s about resetting the foundation so you can move even faster later. Experimentation is a learning process—for the teams running it just as much as for the business. If you’ve ever hit QA bumps while scaling velocity, know you’re not alone. This is part of the process. What’s your approach when you need to “slow down to speed up”? Let’s share ideas below! 👇
-
Balancing Speed and Quality in Product Building In product management, there’s always pressure to move fast—but speed without quality can lead to disaster. So, how do you strike the right balance? If you ship too fast, you risk: ❌ Bugs that frustrate users ❌ Poor UX that leads to churn ❌ A product that doesn’t solve real problems If you move too slow, you risk: ❌ Losing market opportunities ❌ Falling behind competitors ❌ Wasting resources on over-polishing 💡 How to balance speed and quality: 1️⃣ Prioritize ruthlessly – Focus on what truly matters, not on perfection. 2️⃣ Use MVPs & Iteration – Launch, learn, and improve rather than over-building. 3️⃣ Automate testing – Catch issues early without slowing down development. 4️⃣ Gather early user feedback – Validate before investing too much time. 5️⃣ Set clear quality standards – Define what “good enough” looks like. The key? Build fast, but don’t break trust. Speed is valuable, but a product that actually works is what wins in the long run. How do you balance speed and quality in your product development process? Let’s discuss below PS: A great product isn’t just built fast—it’s built right. #productmanagement #productdevelopment #mvp #agile #buildbetter