Integrating Diversity And Inclusion Practices

As GenAI becomes more ubiquitous, research alarmingly shows that women are using these tools at lower rates than men across nearly all regions, sectors, and occupations.   A recent paper from researchers at Harvard Business School, Berkeley, and Stanford synthesizes data from 18 studies covering more than 140k individuals worldwide.   Their findings:   • Women are approximately 22% less likely than men to use GenAI tools • Even when controlling for occupation, age, field of study, and location, the gender gap remains • Web traffic analysis shows women represent only 42% of ChatGPT users and 31% of Claude users   Factors Contributing the to Gap:   - Lack of AI Literacy: Multiple studies showed women reporting significantly lower familiarity with and knowledge about generative AI tools as the largest gender gap driver. - Lack of Training & Confidence: Women have lower confidence in their ability to effectively use AI tools and more likely to report needing training before they can benefit from generative AI.   - Ethical Concerns & Fears of Judgement: Women are more likely to perceive AI usage as unethical or equivalent to cheating, particularly in educational or assignment contexts. They’re also more concerned about being judged unfairly for using these tools.   The Potential Impacts: - Widening Pay & Opportunity Gap: Considerably lower AI adoption by women creates further risk of them falling behind their male counterparts, ultimately widening the gender gap in pay and job opportunities. - Self-Reinforcing Bias: AI systems trained primarily on male-generated data may evolve to serve women's needs poorly, creating a feedback loop that widens existing gender disparities in technology development and adoption.   As educators and AI literacy advocates, we face an urgent responsibility to close this gap and simply improving access is not enough. We need targeted AI literacy training programs, organizations committed to developing more ethical GenAI, and safe and supportive communities like our Women in AI + Education to help bridge this expanding digital divide.   Link to the full study in the comments. And a link also to learn more or join our Women in AI + Education Community. AI for Education #Equity #GenAI #Ailiteracy #womeninAI

Recommended reading! From London. While urban planners strive to create inclusive environments for all citizens, truly inclusive cities require acknowledging that our spaces do not serve everyone equally. Cities historically designed primarily by and for men need deliberate recalibration to address the needs of women and other overlooked groups. This requires policymakers and designers to specifically examine how urban environments function for diverse populations with different lived experiences. The 2024 Handbook: Gender-Informed Urban Design & Planning LLDC (London Legacy Development Corporation) and Arup have released a usefull handbook addressing a critical gap in urban planning: gender-informed design approaches. The publication features beautiful illustrations by Shanice Abbey. Key findings: • Urban environments, traditionally viewed as gender-neutral, often contain embedded biases that compound gender inequalities • Over half of UK girls aged 13-18 report unwanted sexual comments in public spaces • Women's movement patterns are significantly impacted by caregiving responsibilities • Research identified specific "hotspot" areas perceived as unsafe within the LLDC boundary Practical recommendations for implementation: • For local authorities: Establish gender-informed corporate strategies, implement gender budgeting, adopt targeted planning policies, and utilize planning obligations • For developers: Embed gender-informed principles throughout project lifecycle, conduct participatory engagement, and prepare Gender-Informed Design Statements • Deploy specific design interventions including strategic lighting, carefully placed public realm furniture, and thoughtful land use planning This handbook offers evidence-based insights and practical tools for integrating gender-informed principles into existing planning frameworks, emphasizing intersectionality and meaningful community involvement. The guidance extends beyond theoretical concepts, suggesting concrete design solutions such as layered lighting for human scale, social seating configurations, and interim uses for vacant sites. A valuable resource for all urban professionals committed to creating truly inclusive cities. #UrbanPlanning #GenderEquality #InclusiveDesign #PublicSpace #UrbanSafety #SpatialPlanning #DesignInnovation #CommunityEngagement

Gender Mainstreaming in Practice: It provides a detailed algorithm for implementing a gender perspective in all phases of a programme/project cycle: from planning to evaluation. Special attention is paid to baseline gender indicators that help monitor whether a project improves access to development resources for women and men equally, principles of civic participation, including women NGOs, in project implementation and to active promotion of gender equality in information support of the project and communication with national counterparts. #SM #Gender #NGOs

Big News - Sharing A Personal Milestone Announcing The Publication of Our New White Paper "Ushering into the New Era of Financial Inclusion: Enabling Women and Women-Led Organisations." Collaborating with my co-authors, Ayush Tripathi and Soham Jagtap , from The Dialogue, on our shared goal and unwavering commitment to championing the financial empowerment of women has led to this latest research. This project means a lot to me, and I feel incredibly proud of what we've achieved. Together, we've delved deep into the challenges and opportunities that define the financial landscape for women in our country. Current State of Financial Inclusion for Women in India >In India, women make up only about 32.8% of the labour workforce, which is considerably lower than the global average of 47%. >Despite constituting nearly half of the population, women contribute significantly less to India’s GDP, accounting for just 17% compared to the global average of 37% > Only 10% of women in India are borrowers compared to 15% in men >  Women receive credit equal to just 27% of their deposits, whereas men receive 52%. > Despite 51% of women being aware of microcredit, only 11% have availed such loans. Here are three powerful insights from our research that we believe can spark real change: 1/ Harnessing Digital Financial Infrastructure: By leveraging platforms like UPI and the JAM Trinity, we can open up financial access for women, especially in rural areas. Tailoring these models to be more gender-inclusive is key to bridging the financial inclusion gap. 2/ Empowering Through Community: Strengthening Self-Help Groups (SHGs) and utilizing on-ground networks like Bank Sakhis can empower women at the grassroots level. These networks provide essential financial literacy and access to credit, making a tangible difference in their lives. 3/ Innovative Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs): Collaborations between the government and private sector can drive innovative financial solutions. From digital banking ecosystems to customized credit products, these partnerships can support and uplift women entrepreneurs. However, Our work is not done yet. Together, let's champion initiatives that empower women, break down barriers, and pave the way for a more equitable - There IS a business case for empowering women financially. Here are some key stats that highlight this immense potential- > Accelerating women's entrepreneurship in India could generate over 30 million women-owned enterprises, creating 150-170 million jobs. > Increased adoption of digital financial services could raise India’s GDP per capita by 3 to 4 percentage points. > Women-led startups deliver a 35% higher ROI compared to those led by men. This journey has been deeply personal. And, I am honored to have worked alongside Ayush and Soham, Thank you for the collaboration. I look forward to the positive impact our work will have on promoting financial empowerment for women.

🖼️ Framing doesn’t just reflect reality: it creates it. This week I learned that the U.S. defense budget is larger than the next 10 biggest countries’ military budgets combined. It’s easy to interpret that as a country's noble commitment to “defending” its people. But… when was the last time U.S. territory was actually under attack? 💣 The truth is: this isn’t a "defense budget" – it’s largely an *offense* budget. Why am I all of a sudden talking about military budgets? Because that reminded me that how we tell a story shapes what we see, what we question, and what we accept as normal. And in DEI work, framing can mean the difference between reinforcing a broken system and challenging it: 🚨 Framing that misleads us: ❌ “Women are underrepresented in leadership.” → Implicit message? Women need fixing to ascend to higher rankings. ❌ “We need a business case for inclusion.” → Wait… has anyone ever built a business case for exclusion? ❌ “Shelley is a diversity hire.” → So is Jack a “uniformity hire”? 🛠 Framing that shifts responsibility ✅ “Men are overrepresented in leadership.” → Now we’re asking: What makes leadership more accessible to men? ✅ “Exclusion has always been the default.” → Now we’re asking: Why do we need ‘proof’ that we should dismantle discrimination, bigotry, nepotism? ✅ “Shelley is a highly qualified new colleague.” → Because we don’t label Jack by his demographic, do we? Language is never neutral. It directs who gets questioned, what gets fixed, and who holds the burden of change. When I hear a DEI challenge framed in a particular way, I ask myself: Who is this framing letting off the hook? And what conversation does it steer us away from? 🤔 What other ill-framed assumptions on #inclusion and #diversity work have you seen? Link in comments.

Shape Talent's Three Barriers research found this absolutely startling statistic. We expected to see a significant response here but 54% of women being worried about how they are seen in meetings was a concerning discovery. In our survey of women we also found that: - 29% often feel undermined or dismissed in meetings - 23% do not feel they can speak up without being penalised for it - 48% avoid raising problems in order to avoid being seen as a problem themselves - 30% feel inadequate at work In short, women need to weigh up the risks of speaking up and being authentic at work. This is all the more true for women from under-represented groups, specifically: women with a disability, women from the LGBTQ+ community, Black and Asian women, and perimenopausal women. Most organisations would not know this. Let's face it, how many engagement surveys are likely to yield this level of detail? But this feedback is from women from a cross section of industries. Most organisations are likely to have these barriers without knowing it. So, what can you do about it? Firstly, you need to actively and consciously nurture a culture that is psychologically safe and inclusive for all genders. Build awareness campaigns and allyship to support psychological safety and empowerment for all genders. Leverage employee networks / employee resource groups to learn from members’ experiences, while creating an additional channel for members to express their concerns. Apply equality impact assessments to evaluate job designs, recruitment campaigns and leadership models and frameworks. Organisations also need to actively countreact gender biases. While conventional wisdom will guide you to start with behaviours and culture, that can also take years. I recommend starting with processes and systems. By focusing on addressing processes and systems first, it becomes possible to nudge change at scale and help start to challenge the associated behaviours. A good place to start is to audit your talent processes, frameworks and cycles for biases and stereotypes, and to counteract them. Oh and if you didn't know, we help companies do just this. Reach out if you'd like to find out more. #GenderEquity #ThreeBarriers

Early in my career, when I shared the story of a workshop that completely bombed (an email announcing layoffs arrived in everyone's inbox during day 1 lunch of a two-day program -- and I had no idea how to handle this), three women immediately reached out to share their own "disaster" stories. We realized we'd all been carrying shame about normal learning experiences while watching men turn similar setbacks into compelling leadership narratives about risk-taking and resilience. The conversation that we had was more valuable than any success story I could have shared. As women, we are stuck in a double-bind: we are less likely to share our successes AND we are less likely to share our failures. Today, I'm talking about the latter. Sharing failure stories normalizes setbacks as part of growth rather than evidence of inadequacy. When we women are vulnerable about their struggles and what they learned, it creates permission for others to reframe their own experiences. This collective storytelling helps distinguish between individual challenges and systemic issues that affect many women similarly. Men more readily share and learn from failures, often turning them into evidence of their willingness to take risks and push boundaries. Women, knowing our failures are judged more harshly, tend to hide them or frame them as personal shortcomings. This creates isolation around experiences that are actually quite common and entirely normal parts of professional development. Open discussion about setbacks establishes the expectation that failing is not only normal but necessary for success. It builds connection and community among women who might otherwise feel alone in their struggles. When we reframe failures as data and learning experiences rather than shameful secrets, we reduce their power to limit our future risk-taking and ambition. Here are a few tips for sharing and learning from failure stories: • Practice talking about setbacks as learning experiences rather than personal inadequacies • Share what you learned and how you've applied those lessons, not just what went wrong • Seek out other women's failure stories to normalize your own experiences • Look for patterns in women's challenges that suggest systemic rather than individual issues (and then stop seeing systemic challenges as personal failures!) • Create safe spaces for honest conversation about struggles and setbacks • Celebrate recovery and growth as much as initial success • Use failure stories to build connection and mentorship relationships with other women We are not the sum of our failures, but some of our failures make us more relatable, realistic, and ready for our successes. So let's not keep them to ourselves. #WomensERG #DEIB #failure

I'm happy to share the release of the #WiSER White Paper, "Igniting a Global Sustainable Economy," following the impactful discussions at the WiSER Annual Forum during Abu Dhabi Sustainability Week - ADSW 2025. This report highlights the critical role of female entrepreneurs in driving climate solutions and provides actionable strategies to bridge gender gaps in finance, scalability, AI, mentorship, and accessibility—especially for women in the Global South. Why This Matters: Women-led ventures are key to unlocking innovation in sustainability, yet systemic barriers persist. This paper outlines 5 recommendations: 🔹 Increase Gender-Focused Investment : Boost funding, financial literacy, and microloans for female-led climate projects. 🔹 Scale Women-Led Ventures : Streamline policies and partnerships to accelerate growth. 🔹 Harness AI & Digital Tools: Bridge the AI literacy and access gap to empower business expansion. 🔹 Strengthen Mentorship and Networking: Build cross-sector collaborations to provide women with the resources to succeed. 🔹 Empower Women in the Global South : Address legal and financial barriers, invest in STEM education, and improve access to markets and resources. Dive into the full report below or on Masdar (Abu Dhabi Future Energy Company)’s website for insights on turning these strategies into action: https://lnkd.in/dyAFPEP2 Thanks again to my fellow roundtable participants: Lawratou Bah, CFA, Mirella Amalia Vitale, Natasha Shenoy, Hajar Alketbi, Manal B., Mariam Alnaqbi, Shaima Al Mulla

This isn’t a theory book on gender mainstreaming. It’s a hands-on manual built for policy professionals. It includes... 10-Step Gender Mainstreaming Approach → A clear roadmap from problem identification to monitoring and evaluation—adaptable to any policy area. Entry Points Across the Policy Cycle → Learn where and how to integrate gender: from planning and budgeting to implementation and review. Sector-Specific Application → Detailed guidance for: ✔ Health ✔ Education ✔ Environment ✔ ICT ✔ Trade and industry ✔ Governance and justice ✔ Peace and security Practical Tools and Checklists → Use-ready templates for stakeholder analysis, gender budgeting, and results-based management. Guidance on Political Will and Institutional Change → Tips for engaging leadership and building accountability—so gender integration isn’t just symbolic. Intersectional and Inclusive Focus → Encourages analysis that includes age, ethnicity, disability, and other overlapping forms of exclusion. Plain Language, Real Examples → Designed for busy professionals—not academics. Case examples and simplified language make the concepts stick. #GenderMainstreaming 🔔 Follow me for similar content

𝗢𝗡 𝗕𝗘𝗜𝗡𝗚 𝗛𝗘𝗔𝗥𝗗 I was once in a meeting where I relayed an idea. I was a VP. There was another male VP in the meeting. And our boss. The meeting went on as if I didn't say anything. Then, the male VP relayed the same idea. And the boss said, "Great idea!" The oversight wasn't necessarily intended. It manifested an unconscious bias that often goes unnoticed in our daily interactions. Recognizing this is the first step toward making meaningful changes. When a woman states an idea, it may be overlooked, but everyone notices when a man repeats it. This is called the “stolen idea.” When a male coworker runs away with a woman’s idea, remind everyone it originated with her by saying something like, “Great idea! I loved it when Katie originally brought it up, and I’m glad you reiterated it.” If someone takes your idea, you can speak up for yourself by saying, “Thanks for picking up on that idea. Here’s my thought. . .” (then add something new). Ways that we can make sure women’s ideas are heard: 1. Invite other women to speak 2. Distribute speaking time equally 3. Ask to hear from women who are being interrupted and spoken over 4. Amplify other women’s ideas by repeating them and giving credit 5. Praise and showcase other women’s work 6. Create systems to distribute “office housework,” such as note-taking, in meetings 7. Share public speaking opportunities with women who have less power or privilege 8. Share pronouns In reflecting on this experience, I'm reminded of the importance of RAW leadership: Being 𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗟 in acknowledging our biases and striving for equity, Being 𝗔𝗖𝗧𝗜𝗩𝗘 in amplifying and crediting ideas regardless of their source, and recognizing the 𝗪𝗢𝗥𝗧𝗛𝗬 impact of ensuring every voice is heard and valued. By adopting these practices, we can dismantle unconscious biases and create a more inclusive environment where everyone feels seen and heard. How do you ensure all voices are heard in your spaces?