How to Build Trust in Hybrid Negotiations

M&A isn’t just math. It’s psychology. Sellers rarely walk away because of numbers. They walk because they don’t trust you. And trust doesn’t get built in a spreadsheet. It happens in conversations, real ones. The kind that take time. The kind that happen over dinners, site visits, late-night phone calls. When I talk to great buyers, they all say the same thing: the deal turns when the relationship turns. When the seller stops seeing you as “the other side of the table” and starts seeing you as someone who actually cares about what happens next. Legacy. Culture. People. Those matter as much as valuation. Sometimes more. In Buyer-Led M&A™, we teach teams to stop trying to “win” the negotiation and start trying to understand the person. When you do that — when you really invest the time to listen, to show up in person, to build that foundation of trust — you unlock a completely different kind of deal dynamic. You can have the best model in the world, but if the seller doesn’t believe in you, it won’t matter. You’ll lose the deal, not because of price, but because of disconnect. Trust isn’t a soft skill in M&A. It’s the hard edge that makes every other part of the process work. What are you doing to build trust? For me, dinner or drinks help you learn about their personal life (family, hobbies, etc.). You can unlock a real conversation. Let me know your tips in the comments.

𝐓𝐫𝐮𝐬𝐭 𝐢𝐬𝐧’𝐭 𝐛𝐮𝐢𝐥𝐭 𝐢𝐧 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐬. 𝐈𝐭’𝐬 𝐛𝐮𝐢𝐥𝐭 𝐢𝐧 𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐡𝐢𝐩𝐬 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐜𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐬𝐚𝐟𝐞𝐭𝐲. We once had to shut down four city blocks in downtown Phoenix for a private Macklemore concert. On the surface, it sounds like logistics. In reality, it was about trust. It took a month meeting with city departments, knocking on doors, and listening to city employees who mostly wanted to help the public, get a paycheck and benefits, plus not lose their job. Each had their own concerns: safety, traffic, liability or what would their boss do to them. Instead of pushing my agenda, I focused on their pain points and showed that I understood what mattered to them.  After the month of planning, we started at 2:15 the morning of the concert, to set up - they would not let us close the roads, then I convinced them it was okay, after the bars closed. That’s how you move big, complicated projects forward. Not with pressure. Not with shortcuts, instead - by giving people confidence that you see them, hear them, and will protect their interests (if nothing else, that they won’t get fired, their kids will be okay and life will be good). The principle is simple. 𝐈𝐟 𝐩𝐞𝐨𝐩𝐥𝐞 𝐟𝐞𝐞𝐥 𝐬𝐚𝐟𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐩𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐞𝐝, 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐲’𝐥𝐥 𝐨𝐩𝐞𝐧 𝐝𝐨𝐨𝐫𝐬. 𝐈𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐟𝐞𝐞𝐥 𝐢𝐠𝐧𝐨𝐫𝐞𝐝 𝐨𝐫 𝐮𝐧𝐬𝐚𝐟𝐞, 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐲’𝐥𝐥 𝐜𝐥𝐨𝐬𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐦. Whether you’re closing a deal, running a campaign, or trying to get four blocks of a city to shut down, the foundation is the same: trust built through listening. What’s one way you’ve built trust in a tough negotiation? #Trust #Negotiation #DealMaking #TILTTheRoom #MediaLaw #Macklemore Christopher Voss Kwame Christian, Esq., M.A. Alexandra Carter Dr. Robert Cialdini Scott Tillema

Trust doesn't come from your accomplishments. It comes from quiet moves like these: For years I thought I needed more experience, achievements, and wins to earn trust. But real trust isn't built through credentials. It's earned in small moments, consistent choices, and subtle behaviors that others notice - even when you think they don't. Here are 15 quiet moves that instantly build trust 👇🏼 1. You close open loops, catching details others miss ↳ Send 3-bullet wrap-ups after meetings. Reliability builds. 2. You name tension before it gets worse ↳ Name what you sense: "The energy feels different today" 3. You speak softly in tense moments ↳ Lower your tone slightly when making key points. Watch others lean in. 4. You stay calm when others panic, leading with stillness ↳ Take three slow breaths before responding. Let your calm spread. 5. You make space for quiet voices ↳ Ask "What perspective haven't we heard yet?", then wait. 6. You remember and reference what others share ↳ Keep a Key Details note for each relationship in your phone. 7. You replace "but" with "and" to keep doors open ↳ Practice "I hear you, and here's what's possible" 8. You show up early with presence and intention ↳ Close laptop, turn phone face down 2 minutes before others arrive. 9. You speak up for absent team members ↳ Start with "X made an important point about this last week" 10. You turn complaints into possibility ↳ Replace "That won't work" with "Let's experiment with..." 11. You build in space for what really matters ↳ Block 10 min buffers between meetings. Others will follow. 12. You keep small promises to build trust bit by bit ↳ Keep a "promises made" note in your phone. Track follow-through. 13. You protect everyone's time, not just your own ↳ End every meeting 5 minutes early. Set the standard. 14. You ask questions before jumping to fixes ↳ Lead with "What have you tried so far?" before suggesting solutions. 15. You share credit for wins and own responsibility for misses ↳ Use "we" for successes, "I" for challenges. Watch trust grow. Your presence speaks louder than your resume. Trust is earned in these quiet moments. Which move will you practice first? Share below 👇🏼 -- ♻️ Repost to help your network build authentic trust without the struggle 🔔 Follow me Dr. Carolyn Frost for more strategies on leading with quiet impact

Negotiation success: Think smarter, not argue harder. How to use De Bono’s Six Thinking Hats. In my 30 years as a negotiation consultant, Edward de Bono’s Six Thinking Hats combined with state-of-the-art Negotiation principles have often been the difference between success and failure. Especially in extremely challenging negotiations. These thinking styles unlock clarity, creativity, and stronger relationships, even in situations that initially seemed hopeless. Edward de Bono’s Six Hats represent distinct thinking styles crucial for effective negotiation: → White Hat: Facts and objective information. → Red Hat: Emotions and intuition. → Black Hat: Risks and critical judgment. → Yellow Hat: Optimism and positive outcomes. → Green Hat: Creativity and innovative solutions. → Blue Hat: Process control and management. Here’s how I’ve effectively applied these hats in difficult negotiations: 1️⃣ Focus on Interests, Not Positions → White & Red Hats • Clarify underlying facts and interests objectively (White Hat). • Empathize with emotional motivations behind positions (Red Hat). e.g., Employees demand permanent remote work; management wants office return. Objective questioning (White Hat) reveals productivity metrics and workspace usage. Empathy (Red Hat) uncovers emotional interests like flexibility and family time, leading to a hybrid solution. 2️⃣ Invent Options for Mutual Gain → Green & Yellow Hats • Generate creative solutions (Green) highlighting mutual benefits (Yellow). e.g., Companies negotiating resource sharing creatively design a joint venture benefiting both economically. 3️⃣ Use Objective Criteria → White Hat • Anchor negotiations in data-driven benchmarks and unbiased facts. e.g., Parties reference market standards and independent appraisals in lease negotiations, agreeing on fair terms. 4️⃣ Prepare Your BATNA → Black Hat • Critically assess risks, alternatives, and consequences of no agreement. e.g., A buyer evaluates alternative suppliers’ costs and reliability, clearly identifying the best fallback option. 5️⃣ Build Relationships → Red Hat • Recognize and address emotional aspects to build trust. e.g., In heated negotiations, acknowledging frustration and validating concerns reduces tension significantly. 6️⃣ Separate People from the Problem → Blue Hat • Objectively manage the negotiation process to minimize personal conflicts. e.g., A good negotiator sets clear agendas prioritizing shared goals, preventing personal grievances from derailing talks. Next time you’re stuck, pause and ask, “Which hat am I wearing?” Switching hats can open unseen doors.

We just closed a high 6-figure deal last month. 🔥 Here’s what really made the difference — and why it had less to do with features or flashy demos. In our most recent win, it wasn’t product-led growth. It was strategy-led trust. Here are the key lessons I’m taking away: 🔍 Discovery is everything. The moment we built genuine rapport with the CFO, the conversation changed. We weren’t chasing pain points — we were surfacing them together. From organizational blockers to his personal stakes in the project, that clarity guided every move. 🧩 Deal strategy > sales tactics. We spent more time in internal whiteboard sessions than on Zoom calls. We reverse-engineered what a successful outcome would look like, then worked backward into a credible plan. It wasn’t just a pitch — it was a roadmap the CFO could believe in. 🧠 Internal selling matters more than you think. The real objections came from our own team. Can we do this? Do we have the bandwidth? Is this scope too ambitious? Once we got buy-in internally, everything else followed. 🚶♂️Crawl → Walk → Run. We didn’t try to boil the ocean. The final plan looked nothing like the first — and that’s okay. What mattered was delivering quick wins, then scaling. Credibility compounds. 📞 Relationships aren’t built in group calls. We built trust individually — with various stakeholders (Finance, IT, Legal etc) through separate conversations, each tailored and intentional. Different perspectives. Aligned vision. 💡We sold the project, not the platform. No feature dumps. No SKU spreadsheets. We sold an outcome, and that made price negotiation a value alignment exercise, not a discount dance. There’s a lot of noise out there. But deals like this remind me: → Strategy wins. → Trust delivers. → And good discovery is where it all begins. Let’s keep playing the long game. Goal for Q3: first $500k deal.

Next time you're in a crucial negotiation, this common mistake could cost you the deal. I handle approximately 10+ deals/week and I've seen people push too hard for a 'yes' and that's the worst thing It's even backed by psychology. Research shows people are more motivated to avoid losses than pursue gains. This idea, known as loss aversion, comes from The Nobel Prize winner Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky’s Prospect Theory, which explains why we prefer small certain rewards over risky larger ones. We’ve to understand that the harder you push for that "yes"- The more defensive the other party becomes, the faster they look for escape routes, and trust erodes. What actually works is: 💡 Start with the “no” Before pitching, ask what would make this deal a hard no for them. Identifying deal-breakers early allows you to address concerns before they become roadblocks. 💡 Reframe your pitch around their losses. Instead of highlighting what they’ll gain, focus on the problems they’ll avoid or the risks they’ll reduce by saying yes. 💡 Turn the table. Ask questions that let them sell the deal to themselves: “What would make this a no-brainer for you?” “What’s one thing you’d change to feel confident moving forward?” Remember: You're not trying to win an argument. You're building a foundation for a long-term business relationship. The goal isn't forcing a "yes" - it's creating an environment where saying "yes" feels like the natural next step. Have you ever lost a deal by pushing too hard? Or won one by stepping back? Share your negotiation story below.

Negotiations don’t go wrong—they start wrong. Through my experience, I can often tell within the first 30 minutes whether a negotiation will take a collaborative or positional direction. The early signals—the tone, structure, and mindset of the parties—set the course for either value creation or value extraction. Too often, negotiations begin with adversarial positioning, where each side stakes out demands, focuses on "winning," and sees concessions as the primary path to agreement. This zero-sum mentality is where most negotiations start wrong. The problem isn’t what happens later—it’s how we approach the process from the outset. Do you negotiate how to negotiate before you start negotiating? This is a game-changer. Before discussing numbers or terms, set the stage for success. Consider opening with: "I am here today to help you reduce your risk, cost, and liabilities while improving your profits. Would you be interested in having me assist you with this?" This shifts the conversation from position-based bargaining to problem-solving and mutual value creation. SMARTnership® negotiation flips the traditional approach. Instead of defaulting to competitive bargaining, it starts by identifying asymmetric values, trust currency, and hidden gains that can turn the negotiation into a collaborative value-maximizing process. The real difference lies in: ✔ Mindset: Are we here to protect our own turf or explore mutual benefit?  ✔ Communication: Is the focus on claiming or creating value?  ✔ Trust: Is there openness to share real needs, costs, and priorities? If the first 30 minutes are spent staking positions, debating individual gains, or withholding critical information, the negotiation is already off track. But if we establish transparency, mutual benefit, and creative problem-solving early on, we unlock the hidden potential of the deal. Next time you step into a negotiation, ask yourself: Are we starting right? #Negotiation #SMARTnership #ValueCreation #TrustCurrency Tarek Amine Tine Anneberg Francis Goh, FSIArb, FCIArb Francisco Cosme Gražvydas Jukna Juan Manuel García P. Darryl Legault World Commerce & Contracting BMI Executive Institute #negotiationtraining Daniel McLuskie