Managing Diverse Teams With Different Work Styles

🌍 The Real Reason Your Team Isn’t Connecting Might Surprise You 🛑 You’ve built a diverse team. Communication seems clear. Everyone speaks the same language. So why do projects stall? Why does feedback get misread? Why do brilliant employees feel misunderstood? Because what you’re facing isn’t a language barrier—it’s a cultural one. 🤔 Here’s what that looks like in real life: ✳ A team member from a collectivist culture avoids challenging a group decision, even when they disagree. ✳ A manager from a direct feedback culture gets labeled “harsh.” ✳ An employee doesn’t speak up in meetings—not because they don’t have ideas, but because interrupting feels disrespectful in their culture. These aren't missteps—they’re misalignments. And they can quietly erode trust, engagement, and performance. 💡 So how do we fix it? Here are 5 ways to reduce misalignments and build stronger, more inclusive teams: 🧭 1. Train for Cultural Competence—Not Just Diversity Don’t stop at DEI 101. Offer immersive training that helps employees navigate different communication styles, values, and worldviews. 🗣 2. Clarify Team Norms Make the invisible visible. Talk about what “respectful communication” means across cultures. Set expectations before conflicts arise. 🛎 3. Slow Down Decision-Making Fast-paced environments often leave diverse perspectives unheard. Build in time to reflect, revisit, and invite global input. 🌍 4. Encourage Curiosity Over Judgment When something feels off, ask: Could this be cultural? This small shift creates room for empathy and deeper connection. 📊 5. Audit Systems for Cultural Bias Review how you evaluate performance, give feedback, and promote leadership. Are your systems inclusive, or unintentionally favoring one style? 🎯 Cultural differences shouldn’t divide your team—they should drive your innovation. If you’re ready to create a workplace where every team member can thrive, I’d love to help. 📅 Book a complimentary call and let’s talk about what cultural competence could look like in your organization. The link is on my profile. Because when we understand each other, we work better together. 💬 #CulturalCompetence #GlobalTeams #InclusiveLeadership #CrossCulturalCommunication #DEIStrategy

Every company is different. Every team is different. Every leader is different. Every team member is different. So...leaders, when you bring a new person on to your team, do yourself, the new hire, and existing team members a favor and have everyone , (including yourself), create and share a "How to Work Best With Me" document or email. Having been a people leader several times, I have done this every time a new person joined the team. And it is so important. Let's break down the key elements for both existing team members and new hires to include in their "How to work best with me" comms. For existing team members: 1. Communication preferences: - Preferred communication channels (e.g., email, Slack, in-person) - Best times for meetings or quick chats - How they like to receive feedback 2. Work style: - Whether they prefer collaborative or independent work - Their approach to problem-solving (e.g., analytical, creative) - How they handle deadlines and pressure 3. Strengths and expertise: - Areas where they excel and can offer support to others - Specific skills or knowledge they're willing to share 4. Growth areas: - Skills they're currently developing - Areas where they appreciate extra support or patience 5. Personal quirks or habits: - Any particular work habits that others should be aware of - How they tend to react under stress 6. Project management: - How they like to organize tasks and track progress - Their preferred level of autonomy vs. guidance 7. Decision-making style: - How they approach making choices (e.g., data-driven, intuitive) - Their comfort level with risk For new hires: 1. Previous work experience: - Brief overview of their background and how it relates to the current role - Any significant differences between their previous and current work environments 2. Learning style: - How they best absorb new information (e.g., visual, hands-on, reading) - Their preferred onboarding pace 3. Initial goals: - What they hope to achieve in their first few months - Areas where they'd like to contribute or learn quickly 4. Support needs: - Types of resources or guidance they find most helpful when starting a new role - Any concerns or uncertainties about the new position 5. Cultural adaptation: - Any cultural differences they're navigating - How the team can help them integrate smoothly 6. Motivations: - What drew them to this role or company - What keeps them engaged and excited about work 7. Potential challenges: - Any anticipated difficulties in adjusting to the new role - How colleagues can best support them during the transition By including this information, leaders, existing team members, and new hires can foster better understanding, collaboration, and integration within the team. Also, these documents should be living documents, updated as people grow and change in their roles. #Leadership #Teams

When I was 20 years old, I took 100+ Australian students to Shenyang — a city that borders North Korea & Russia, and also the capital of industrial China. Even though I am ethnically Chinese and fluent in Mandarin, I had my first real culture shock. It was my first time working with the local Chinese. I couldn’t understand when people danced with their words in a roundabout way, their deference to hierarchy, the layers of nuance in what 𝙬𝙖𝙨𝙣’𝙩 said. And over the years, as I worked with varying cultures across APAC and the US, I have come to see the differences of working in high vs low context environments. When we don’t appreciate the cultural differences in how others convey and interpret information, we are more likely to misunderstand them. In Erin Meyer’s book, The Culture Map, she describes high and low context as depending on whether there is an assumption of shared context and understanding. High context cultures communicate in implicit, subtle, layered and nuanced ways, whilst low context cultures are more explicit, straightforward and concise. Interestingly, this is often clustered by language type along a spectrum. Low context languages are predominantly anglo-saxon, with romance languages being in the middle and high context being the asian language cluster. Then within each language cluster, it depends on homogeneity of the culture and length of history. It’s easy to then understand why companies with global teams often have varying challenges communicating in these different styles. If I could go back and give advice to my 20 year old self, here’s some things I would have done differently: 👀 when working with a high context culture like China, use effective listening, observe body language, and ask open-ended questions to try to interpret the meaning behind the words ✍🏻 when working with a low context culture like the US, be clear and to the point. Communicate explicitly, and pay attention to the literal meanings of words, with strong emphasis on written communication 🤝 when working together with different styles across cultures, mutually design and agree on a communication framework, and be held accountable to it What has your experience been with working with different cultures?