There's more to accessibility than assistive technologies (AT), such as screen readers and alternative inputs. Companies that want to create inclusive and accessible experiences need to think beyond AT. Examples: - Processes - Motion - Verification options - Communication options - Alerts - Colors - Text formatting Processes refer to interactions with customers. Tech support entered a chat with me. They asked for a phone number in case we got disconnected. I explained I'm deaf and that's not a good option. I suggested they offer choices of an email address or a phone number. The next time I contacted them, they gave me a choice of providing an email address or a phone number. Such a simple change made a huge difference. Another example. I was watching a video from a company that wanted my feedback on captions. I could barely tolerate the video with a lot of fast motion. It's a problem for many folks with and without disabilities. Some have an animated GIF in their email signatures. Every time I open the email, repetitive motion plays endlessly. I can't stop it. Though I have reduced motion turned on, it won't work for this. It also makes the email file size bigger, which affects performance. If the animated GIF is important, then you can work around it by creating a YouTube or Vimeo video and linking to it. It gives people control. Verification options refer to calling someone to verify their identity. Often, the only option is a phone call. Texting needs to be an option. Emailing needs to be an option as not everyone has a phone. It's OK to require verification as long as we have choices. Communication options refer to giving us choices in how we communicate. Often, a company's contact information only lists a phone number. We need another option. Many folks don't like phone calls, not just those who are deaf or hard of hearing. Why can't we sit next to each other and text each other in a noisy room? I've had an entire conversation on an airplane using pen and paper. Sometimes the initial communication may be accessible, but it changes later. For example, I chatted with support. They said they needed to escalate the ticket to a team that only does phone calls. Sometimes, tech support will suggest I have someone call for me. I'm a capable adult. Besides the person who helps me shouldn't have access to my private information. It's a privacy issue. Alerts are how we get notified. Offer options. Android and iPhones do a great job of offering many custom notification options. I still run into hotel rooms with no visual fire alarm. What other ways do we need to consider accessibility aside from keyboards, switches, other inputs, assistive devices, and assistive technologies? Color contrast and text formatting make or break the experience. 🔔 Tap the profile bell 👉 Follow #MerylMots for more ✉️ Want to work together? Contact me. #Accessibility Image: Chase verification form with a choice of being texted or called.
Incorporating Accessibility In User Experience Innovation
Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.
Summary
Incorporating accessibility into user experience innovation means designing products and services that are usable by everyone, including people with disabilities, without the need for separate solutions. This approach not only removes barriers but also benefits all users by creating more intuitive and inclusive experiences.
- Broaden communication options: Offer multiple ways for users to interact, such as phone, email, or text, so they can choose the method that works best for them.
- Simplify design interfaces: Streamline layouts, add larger fonts, and reduce unnecessary features to ensure ease of use for people with varying abilities and preferences.
- Enable flexibility in processes: Provide customizable settings like verification methods and notification options, catering to diverse needs and ensuring equitable access.
-
-
Inclusive form design isn’t a luxury, it's a civil right. Most registration processes are forms based. Without accessible forms, people who use assistive technology can't get through the door. When we talk about submit buttons, the choice to make them active all the time isn’t about “just making things easier” — it’s about removing real accessibility barriers. An active submit button means users who rely on screen readers or keyboard navigation can always finish what they started. But most designers/UX folks talk about submit vs in-line field validation as an "or." I propose we look at them as an "and." Just like the little girl in the meme says, "why not both?" If you have an active submit button and ALSO add in-line validation, which flags issues as they arise, you are creating an experience that sets the standard for a best practice. You aren't just following the guidelines to achieve compliance, you are making sure that people with disabilities have the best chance of becoming customers as anyone else. Real-time feedback reduces stress for those who may struggle to go back and forth in a form, helping everyone complete it without hassle. Active submit combined with user-friendly error message means users don't get stuck looking through a long form trying to figure out which required field they missed. Companies like #Amazon have it right — they combine both. When we prioritize both an always-active button and in-line validation, we’re making digital spaces accessible, user-centered, and, most importantly, equitable. Alt: first image is a female child seated in an office with the caption: "Submit Button always active" on the left side and "in-line field validation" on the right side. Beneath it is a question: "why don't we have both? " second image shows group of persons lifting the female child up in celebration. #AccessibilityMemeMonday #InclusiveDesign #AccessibleForms #DigitalEquity #Disability #Inclusion #UserCenteredAccessibility https://lnkd.in/ecX_YG93
-
Lyft knew they had a problem. Only 5.6% of its users are over 65, and those users are 57% more likely to miss the ride they ordered. So, Lyft created Silver – a special app version for seniors. But why create a separate app when these improvements would benefit all users? The curb-cut effect is real. Features designed for wheelchair users ended up helping parents with strollers, travelers with luggage, and delivery workers with carts. The features in Lyft's senior-friendly app wouldn't only benefit older riders: 💡The 1.4x larger font option? Great for bright sunlight, rough rides. 💡Simplified interface? Less cognitive load for all of us. 💡Live help operators? Great for anyone when there's a problem. 💡Select preference for easy entry/exit vehicles? Not everyone likes pickup trucks. What started as an accommodation should became a universal improvement. The most powerful insight? Designing for seniors forced Lyft to prioritize what truly matters: simplicity and ease of use. Will they leverage this for all their users? The next time someone suggests adding another button to your interface or feature to your product, consider this approach instead: sometimes the most innovative design is the one that works for everyone. Rather than creating separate "accessible" versions, what if we just built our core products to be usable by all? This is the paradox of inclusive design - what works better for some almost always works better for all. What "accessibility" feature have you encountered that actually made life better for all users? #UniversalDesign #ProductThinking #CustomerExperience