How to Structure Climate Assets for Investment

📣 Breaking Down Capital Structure in #ClimateTech Startups Understanding the capital structure in climate tech #startups, particularly those hardware-based, can differ greatly from digital startups. 👇 Hers’s an illustration of the evolution of capital types over time - equity, grants, and debt - with actual 💶 figures. Key takeaway: The name of the game is Non-Dilutive Capital ⭐ 1️⃣ Embrace Non-Dilutive Capital: Scaling with equity alone is a non-starter. There's insufficient climate-dedicated VC money out there and it's far from the most efficient way to finance CAPEX due to ownership dilution and the Cost of Equity. 2️⃣ Optimise Timing: With careful planning, each funding round can be delayed, allowing your company value to mature by achieving higher TRLs. Leverage grants wisely and delay equity funding rounds. 3️⃣ Strike a Balance with Grants: While grants are attractive, an overdose can divert you from your main focus of selling products and turn you into an R&D centre. Exercise caution! 4️⃣ Consider Debt Early: It's rocket fuel for growth. Proper measures can ensure you secure it even before hitting TRL9. 💡Tips for Raising Non-Dilutive Capital: General: - Begin early, it takes time - Build a solid funnel (4:1 ratio is a good rule) - Engage experts, it saves time and ups your chances Grants: - Be prepared to have some fresh equity to unlock certain grants - Participate in competitions - every sum counts and it's free exposure! Debt: - Sign off-takes to significantly boost your chances - Get in touch with your regional bank - they look at more than just ROI. It's time to rethink and redesign your capital strategy! #venturecapital #funding #innovation

One of the most overwhelming parts of building in #climate is constructing a "capital stack". Unlike building in SAAS, in #climatetech you need to fund physical "stuff" and returns on investments take longer-- this means you can't only rely on VCs and need to get creative. Daniel Kriozere put a panel together this week to demystify this, bringing together companies from across the stack: from where we at Streamline Climate sit with grants, to VC funding, to equipment financing with Luc Gerdes and Camber Road, etc.. ( 🧩 See the chart below for how it all fits together ) Having a full capital stack represented on a panel meant we could explore when and why each capital sources was relevant. A lot of climate tech is early and unproven, making traditional funding harder to access and you need to combine multiple. Financing these "first of a kind" #FOAK projects requires a larger risk appetite which fewer lenders have. Some of the key takeaways shared: 1) Match the type of capital to the specific business function. Ex: if you need expensive equipment, consider equipment financing rather than operating off of your balance sheet 2) These capital sources are not competing against eachother, rather they are collaborating. For example, the best time for Venture Debt is right after raising a VC round. 3) This is hard. There is no one-size-fits-all. --- 💚 Shoutout to the 9Zero Climate Innovation Hub for hosting us. They're bringing the sf climate ecosystem together - thanks for all the awesome work done by Matthew Joehnk and Duncan Logan