Best Practices For Implementing AI In Engineering

The GenAI wave is real, but most engineers still feel stuck between hype and practical skills. That’s why I created this 15-step roadmap—a clear, technically grounded path to transitioning from traditional software development to advanced AI engineering. This isn’t a list of buzzwords. It’s the architecture of skills required to build agentic AI systems, production-grade LLM apps, and scalable pipelines in 2025. Here’s what this journey actually looks like: 🔹 Foundation Phase (Steps 1–5): → Start with Python + libraries (NumPy, Pandas, etc.) → Brush up on data structures & Big-O — still essential for model efficiency → Learn basic math for AI (linear algebra, stats, calculus) → Understand the evolution of AI from rule-based to supervised to agentic systems → Dive into prompt engineering: zero-shot, CoT, and templates with LangChain 🔹 Build & Integrate (Steps 6–10): → Work with LLM APIs (OpenAI, Claude, Gemini) and use function calling → Learn RAG: embeddings, vector DBs, LangChain chains → Build agentic workflows with LangGraph, CrewAI, and AutoGen → Understand transformer internals (positional encoding, masking, BERT to LLaMA) → Master deployment with FastAPI, Docker, Flask, and Streamlit 🔹 Production-Ready (Steps 11–15): → Learn MLOps: versioning, CI/CD, tracking with MLflow & DVC → Optimize for real workloads using quantization, batching, and distillation (ONNX, Triton) → Secure AI systems against injection, abuse, and hallucination → Monitor LLM usage and performance → Architect multi-agent systems with state control and memory Too many “AI tutorials” skip the real-world complexity, including permissioning, security, memory, token limits, and agent orchestration. But that’s what actually separates a prototype from a production-grade AI app. If you’re serious about becoming an AI Engineer, this is your blueprint. And yes, you can start today. You just need a structured plan and consistency. Feel free to save, share, or tag someone on this journey.

If you are building AI agents or learning about them, then you should keep these best practices in mind 👇 Building agentic systems isn’t just about chaining prompts anymore, it’s about designing robust, interpretable, and production-grade systems that interact with tools, humans, and other agents in complex environments. Here are 10 essential design principles you need to know: ➡️ Modular Architectures Separate planning, reasoning, perception, and actuation. This makes your agents more interpretable and easier to debug. Think planner-executor separation in LangGraph or CogAgent-style designs. ➡️ Tool-Use APIs via MCP or Open Function Calling Adopt the Model Context Protocol (MCP) or OpenAI’s Function Calling to interface safely with external tools. These standard interfaces provide strong typing, parameter validation, and consistent execution behavior. ➡️ Long-Term & Working Memory Memory is non-optional for non-trivial agents. Use hybrid memory stacks, vector search tools like MemGPT or Marqo for retrieval, combined with structured memory systems like LlamaIndex agents for factual consistency. ➡️ Reflection & Self-Critique Loops Implement agent self-evaluation using ReAct, Reflexion, or emerging techniques like Voyager-style curriculum refinement. Reflection improves reasoning and helps correct hallucinated chains of thought. ➡️ Planning with Hierarchies Use hierarchical planning: a high-level planner for task decomposition and a low-level executor to interact with tools. This improves reusability and modularity, especially in multi-step or multi-modal workflows. ➡️ Multi-Agent Collaboration Use protocols like AutoGen, A2A, or ChatDev to support agent-to-agent negotiation, subtask allocation, and cooperative planning. This is foundational for open-ended workflows and enterprise-scale orchestration. ➡️ Simulation + Eval Harnesses Always test in simulation. Use benchmarks like ToolBench, SWE-agent, or AgentBoard to validate agent performance before production. This minimizes surprises and surfaces regressions early. ➡️ Safety & Alignment Layers Don’t ship agents without guardrails. Use tools like Llama Guard v4, Prompt Shield, and role-based access controls. Add structured rate-limiting to prevent overuse or sensitive tool invocation. ➡️ Cost-Aware Agent Execution Implement token budgeting, step count tracking, and execution metrics. Especially in multi-agent settings, costs can grow exponentially if unbounded. ➡️ Human-in-the-Loop Orchestration Always have an escalation path. Add override triggers, fallback LLMs, or route to human-in-the-loop for edge cases and critical decision points. This protects quality and trust. PS: If you are interested to learn more about AI Agents and MCP, join the hands-on workshop, I am hosting on 31st May: https://lnkd.in/dWyiN89z If you found this insightful, share this with your network ♻️ Follow me (Aishwarya Srinivasan) for more AI insights and educational content.

This seems to be on everyone’s mind: how to operationalize your product team around AI. Peter Yang and I recently chatted about this topic and here’s what I shared about how we are doing this at Duolingo. For improving our product: -Using AI to solve problems that weren’t solvable before. One of the problems we had been trying to solve for years was conversation practice. With our Max feature, Video Call, learners can now practice conversations with our character Lily. The conversations are also personalized to each learner’s proficiency level. -Prototyping with AI to speed up the product process. For example, for our Duolingo Chess, PMs vibe-coded with LLMs to quickly build a prototype. This decreased rounds of iteration, allowing our Engineers to start building the final product much sooner. -Integrating AI into our tooling to scale. This allowed us to go from 100 language courses in 12 years to nearly 150 new ones in the last 12 months. For increasing AI adoption: -Building with AI Slack channels. Created an AI Slack channel for people to show and tell and share prototypes and tips. -“AI Show and Tell” at All-Hands meetings. Added a five‑minute live demo slot in every all hands meeting for people to share updates on AI work. -FriAIdays. Protected a two‑hour block every Friday for hands-on experimentation and demos. -Function-specific AI working groups. Assembled a cross-functional group (Eng, PM, Design, etc.) to test new tools and share best practices with the rest of the org. -Company-wide AI hackathon. Scheduled a 3-day hackathon focused on using generative AI. Here are some of our favorite AI tools and how we are using them: -ChatGPT as a general assistant -Cursor or Replit for vibe coding or prototyping  -Granola or Fathom for taking meeting notes -Glean for internal company search #productmanagement #duolingo

I've put my last 6 months building and selling AI Agents I've finally have "What to Use Framework" LLMs → You need fast, simple text generation or basic Q&A → Content doesn't require real-time or specialized data → Budget and complexity need to stay minimal → Use case: Customer FAQs, email templates, basic content creation RAG: → You need accurate answers from your company's knowledge base → Information changes frequently and must stay current → Domain expertise is critical but scope is well-defined → Use case: Employee handbooks, product documentation, compliance queries AI Agents → Tasks require multiple steps and decision-making → You need integration with existing tools and databases → Workflows involve reasoning, planning, and memory → Use case: Sales pipeline management, IT support tickets, data analysis Agentic AI → Multiple specialized functions must work together → Scale demands coordination across different systems → Real-time collaboration between AI capabilities is essential → Use case: Supply chain optimization, smart factory operations, financial trading My Take: Most companies jump straight to complex agentic systems when a simple RAG setup would solve 80% of their problems. Start simple, prove value, then scale complexity. Take a Crawl, Walk, Run approach with AI I've seen more AI projects fail from over-engineering than under-engineering. Match your architecture to your actual business complexity, not your ambitions. P.S. If you're looking for right solutions, DM me - I answer all valid DMs 👋 .