Overcoming Challenges In Engineering Team Dynamics

There's one pattern I've seen repeatedly in all my years in the business: Engineering teams and product teams locked in constant conflict. Engineers complain about unclear requirements and constant scope changes. Product managers grumble about missed deadlines and pushback on features. Simple requests turn into lengthy debates. Most leaders try to fix this with: - New processes - Different frameworks - Team reorganizations - "Managing the healthy tension" But here's what I discovered: The root cause isn't personalities or communication. 𝗜𝘁'𝘀 𝗺𝗶𝘀𝗮𝗹𝗶𝗴𝗻𝗲𝗱 𝗶𝗻𝗰𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲𝘀. When engineers are rewarded for code quality and technical excellence while product managers are evaluated on shipping features and hitting roadmap milestones, you've designed conflict into your system. After years of trial and error, here's what worked for us: ✅ Make customer impact the north star metric for BOTH teams ✅ Give engineers context about business goals and include product teams in technical planning ✅ Reward collaboration and joint problem-solving over individual achievements When we aligned incentives around customer outcomes, engineers started proposing creative solutions and product managers became more receptive to technical considerations. Your organization's reward systems create the behavior you see. What steps are you taking to align incentives in your organization? #ProductDevelopment #EngineeringLeadership #TechManagement

Teams are often dysfunctional. For six reasons, not five. In his 2002 book "The Five Dysfunctions of a Team," Patrick Lencioni suggested that genuine teamwork is rare, and that organizations often unknowingly fall prey to five interrelated dysfunctions that hinder team effectiveness. These dysfunctions form an inverted pyramid, each one leading to the next: - Absence of Trust: Team members are unwilling to be vulnerable, leading to... - Fear of Conflict: Inability to engage in unfiltered, passionate debate of ideas, leading to... - Lack of Commitment: Feigning agreement during meetings, leading to... - Avoidance of Accountability: Hesitation to call peers on actions and behaviors that seem counterproductive, leading to... - Inattention to Results: Putting individual needs above the collective goals of the team. Lencioni emphasizes that while these concepts are simple in theory, they require significant discipline and persistence to overcome in practice. He also writes that the leader plays a crucial role by demonstrating vulnerability first, setting the tone for the team to follow. I very much agree with his take. Based on my experience working with diverse teams across the globe, though, I would add another dysfunction: 6. Misunderstanding the Power of Difference: Diverse teams bring unique perspectives and strengths, but misunderstanding or underestimating these differences can lead to missed opportunities and great resentment. Here's how to address this dysfunction: - Acknowledge, understand and value differences. - Foster inclusive, candid communication. - Don't blame difference when things go wrong (since difference is usually not to blame). Whatever the line of difference—identity, role, or geographical location—effective teams manage differences proactively and thoughtfully. When they don't, misunderstandings and misinterpretations due to differences in language, cultural norms, and communication styles can hinder their effectiveness. When we recognize and harness differences, we unlock the full potential of teams, driving exceptional results. #Collaboration #Teams #HumanResources #Leadership #Innovation #Difference #Communication

After years of managing rocky relationships between product and engineering leaders, these are the top 5 things I've learned you can do to make these partnerships great: 1. Foster Strategic Action: Maintain a well-thought-out backlog of problems that acknowledges potential risks and strategies for overcoming them. This approach keeps engineers engaged, solving real customer issues, and builds trust across teams. 2. Simplify Processes: Introduce only necessary processes and keep them straightforward. Maintain a regular schedule of essential meetings and minimize ad-hoc interruptions to give engineers more time to focus. 3. Collaborate on Solutions: Instead of dictating solutions, work closely with engineers to understand problems and explore solutions together. This partnership leverages their technical expertise and aligns efforts with customer needs, enhancing innovation and ownership. 4. Respect Technical Debt: Recognize and prioritize technical debt within the product roadmap. Trust engineers to identify critical technical issues that need addressing to keep the product competitive and maintain high-quality standards. 5. Build Relationships: Spend time with your engineering team outside of regular work tasks through meals, activities, or shared hobbies. Building personal connections fosters trust and improves collaboration, making it easier to tackle challenges together effectively. I’ve seen amazing product and engineering partnerships and some not-so-great ones. Teams that take the time to improve their relationship really see the benefits. While natural tensions exist, the best teams put in the effort to work well together, resulting in more successful products. #techleads #product #engineering

I was leading a team developing an innovation in consumer packaged goods. The tension was thick. Why? Ridiculously accelerated timeline, technical complexity through the roof, experimental trials every other week. Just when the team was at its wits' end, our VP added two more product variations to our already impossible trial schedule. After the announcement, you could hear a pin drop. Faces frozen. Arms crossed. Energy completely sucked out of the room. That's when it hit me. This wasn't a "people problem", it was a systems problem. My engineering brain immediately went to work: • What inputs are creating these outputs? • Where are the bottlenecks in the emotional system? • How do we optimize for better performance? Instead of seeing emotions as messy and unpredictable, I started seeing them as data. Fear = Signal that safety needs aren't met Frustration = Signal that the process needs adjustment Disengagement = Signal that people don't feel valued That shift changed everything. I stopped trying to eliminate emotions and started engineering solutions that worked WITH them. I called that VP: "When you made that request, the energy was sucked out of the room. I need you to acknowledge their effort and what you've asked puts on their plates." The next morning? Completely different team. Re-engaged, ready to make the impossible happen. Here's what I learned: Emotions aren't the enemy of logic, they're the missing variable in your equation. When you approach feelings with the same rigor you'd bring to any other system, you don't just solve the problem. You optimize for human performance. The most successful leaders aren't choosing between IQ and EQ. They're using both to engineer better outcomes. That project became one of the most successful launches in company history. What systems thinking could you apply to your team's emotional challenges? 🔔 Follow for more insights on engineering better workplace cultures