Encouraging Feedback During Performance Check-Ins

Being smart doesn't matter if people don't like collaborating with you. In my commitment to continuous improvement, I value constructive feedback. As part of this process, I regularly posed four questions to my colleagues to enhance our working relationships. How did I use these? - Approximately every six months, I reach out to team members with the four questions listed below. I express that responses are entirely voluntary, with no set timeframe for replies. - Recognizing that not everyone may be comfortable providing direct feedback, I offer an alternative option. Team members can share their thoughts with my manager, who can then incorporate the feedback into a performance review or discuss it anonymously during our 1x1. - I use a spreadsheet to organize the insights. Each question gets its own column, and I fill in the rows with the feedback I get. This enables me to identify recurring themes, helping us focus on areas that contribute positively or require adjustment. The outcomes of this feedback loop have been instrumental in shaping my working relationships but also come through in my performance reviews: 🌟 2023 “Phyllis’ greatest strength is her constant drive to make things better – the product, processes, and relationships with those around her. Phyllis is always open to asking for feedback and incorporating the feedback quickly.” 🌟 2022 “A very consistent theme in your peer feedback is your constant focus on seeking feedback and improving upon it.” 🌟 2021 “You continue to be a culture add to the team and care about making the team better through sharing information, feedback, and creating an environment where everyone feels welcome.” The four questions I asked are: 1. What are things I’ve done that you’ve found helpful? 2. What are things I’ve done that you’ve found frustrating or confusing? 3. What do I need to know about you or how you work that could help our working relationship? 4. What are some challenges you’re facing at the moment? Please let me know: how do you navigate the world of peer feedback? Share your wisdom or give it a shot and let me know how it goes! I’m sure those around you will appreciate it.

If someone is surprised by the feedback they receive, this is a management failure. After witnessing multiple instances of this failure at Amazon, we realized our feedback mechanism was deeply flawed. So, we fixed it. In order for the organization to perform at its highest, employees need to know not only what is expected of them, but also how those expectations will be measured. Too often, managers assume that capable people will simply “figure things out,” but this is difficult and destined to fail without explicit expectations and continuous feedback. I remember the experience of an employee we can call “Melinda.” She had been a strong performer for two years before she transitioned into a new role on another team. She attacked the new opportunity with enthusiasm, working long hours and believing she was on the right track. Then, her manager expressed concerns about her performance and the criticism came as a shock. The feedback was vague, and there had been no regular check-ins or early signs to help her course-correct. This caused her motivation to suffer and her performance declined significantly. Eventually, she left the company. Afterward, we conducted a full review and we discovered that Melinda’s manager had never clearly articulated the expectations of the new role. Worse, her previous achievements had been disregarded in her evaluation. The system had failed her. This incident was not isolated. It illustrated a pattern. It revealed broader gaps in how we managed performance transitions and feedback loops. So, in response, we developed and deployed new mechanisms to ensure clarity from day one. We began requiring managers to explicitly define role expectations and conduct structured check-ins during an employee’s first 90 days in a new position. We also reinforced the cultural norm that feedback must be timely, specific, and actionable. These changes were rooted in a core principle of leadership: you have to make others successful too. Good management does not involve catching people off guard or putting them in “sink or swim” situations. When employees fail because expectations were unclear, that failure belongs to the manager. The best thing to do when you see those failures is to treat them as systems to improve. That’s how you build a culture of high performance.

A recent conversation I’ve had with at least three people: being a high performer but not receiving much feedback. **Supervisors, listen in close.** If you have someone on your team who is self-sufficient, highly productive, and easy for you, you MUST find ways to give them feedback or you will lose them. If not physically, it will be mentally. Here are some easy actions you can take to prevent your highest performers from checking out: **Schedule Regular Check-ins:** Even if they seem to be doing fine, regular one-on-one meetings provide a platform for feedback and discussion. DO NOT cancel these just because they are doing well. **Acknowledge Their Efforts:** A simple "thank you" or "great job" can go a long way in making them feel valued. **Provide Constructive Feedback:** Offer specific, actionable feedback that will continue to help them grow. High performers crave growth. **Set New Challenges:** Keep them engaged by setting new goals or challenges that align with their skills and interests. This is a great place to delegate. When you delegate, explain how it will prepare them for the next role you envision them in, just make sure it's a role they WANT before you begin. **Encourage Peer Connection:** Sitting next to and working with high performers increases production for all staff. Where can your high performer encourage others to step up their game? This could be a mentorship situation with a newer team member or simply encouraging them to work together for diverse perspectives. High-performing friends: What's the best way a boss has ever kept your momentum going?