Strategies For Curriculum Development In Non-Traditional Settings

One underlying factor in some of society’s most challenging issues—health disparities, workforce gaps, and educational inequities—is the breakdown in the transfer of generational knowledge. In higher education, this is especially evident for non-traditional students, including servicemembers transitioning to the civilian sector, who bring decades of experience and unique insight into our classrooms. Consider, for instance, a military medic with years of experience providing critical care in high-stakes environments. When they separate from the service and pursue a career in the health professions, they’re often met with frustration and disappointment. Their years of expertise and practical knowledge in medical care don’t translate into meaningful credit or career advancement in the civilian healthcare system. This gap is not only frustrating but also a missed opportunity—for the individual and the healthcare workforce. To address this, higher education must evolve in ways that actively support returning adult learners and transitioning veterans: - Aggressive, Constructive Credit Awarding: We need to recognize and credit life experience and industry expertise in meaningful ways. For military medics, this means granting academic credit and pathways that honor the skills they’ve honed under pressure. - Flexible Learning Models: Learning pathways must reflect real-world constraints and diverse goals. This includes offering micro-credentials, certificates, and other targeted credentials that provide an accessible approach to education and a valuable onramp to more advanced opportunities. For many, these options offer a viable, practical path toward meaningful work without the immediate need for a full degree. Timing and life circumstances matter, and flexible options empower learners to choose what best fits their journey, allowing them to build skills progressively and re-enter formal education when the time is right. - Policies Supporting Intergenerational Learning: By promoting diverse learning environments that blend traditional students with those who have extensive real-world experience, we create richer educational experiences. This approach benefits all students, fostering an exchange of insights that’s essential to tackling society’s complex challenges. Promoting intergenerational learning requires building inclusive, supportive systems that recognize and value the expertise accumulated through life and work. By intentionally bridging the gap between military and civilian sectors and supporting veterans and adult learners in higher education, we can create classrooms that reflect the diversity of skills, perspectives, and experiences needed to address the issues of our time. Sincerely, A former combat medic finding his second calling in higher education

Action-Oriented Strategies for Higher Education Administrators: Supporting Students in the Age of AI As AI reshapes the workforce, Kathleen deLaski’s insights urge higher education leaders to evolve beyond traditional degree pathways. Institutions must help students develop adaptable skills, pursue flexible credentials, and prepare for a rapidly changing labor market. 1. Embrace Flexible Learning Pathways • Expand Credential Options: Offer stackable credentials, micro-certifications, and short-term programs aligned with workforce needs. • Support Lifelong Learners: Design offerings for career switchers, adult learners, and students seeking targeted upskilling. 2. Integrate Work-Based Learning Experiences • Offer Project-Based Learning: Embed real-world challenges into courses to help students build portfolios and apply classroom learning. • Promote Internships and Co-ops: Strengthen employer partnerships to provide more structured and scalable experiential opportunities. 3. Align Curriculum with Industry Demands • Prioritize Transferable Skills: Ensure students develop communication, critical thinking, problem-solving, and adaptability. • Introduce AI and Tech Literacy: Help students understand and responsibly engage with emerging technologies shaping their fields. 4. Deepen Employer Collaboration • Co-Develop Career Pathways: Work directly with employers to shape programs that reflect current and future job requirements. • Recognize Industry Certifications: Integrate or endorse credentials that are highly valued in targeted fields. 5. Rethink the Value Proposition of a Degree • Highlight Career Outcomes: Be transparent about employment rates, earnings, and skill acquisition tied to academic programs. • Support Alternative Pathways: Embrace and validate non-traditional routes to success, ensuring students can choose the right fit for their goals. ⸻ By adopting these strategies, higher education leaders can position their institutions as agile, student-centered, and aligned with the future of work in an AI-driven workforce.

“Our classes are built for working adults.” “We understand the needs of nontraditional learners.” We hear these statements all the time. But too often, they sound supportive while staying vague. But the harsh reality is that support without specificity doesn’t actually move the needle on retention or engagement. It just checks a box. Even the so-called “traditional” student has changed. They’re often working, commuting, caring for others, or questioning whether college is worth it. We can’t keep designing for yesterday’s student and expect today’s to thrive. This week, I’ll be sharing five posts focused on curriculum strategies for specific groups of learners. But first, let’s start with a practice that should be at the core of every course design process: Student-informed learner personas. A strong persona doesn’t just describe a demographic; it brings your actual students to life. Here’s what that can look like: Meet Susan. She’s a student mom balancing two young children, which is a job that doesn’t always respect her class calendar. Her kids sicknesses don’t fall perfectly in line with due dates. Susan isn’t an outlier. At [institution name], 65% of our students are parents. Or: Meet Jamal. He’s a full-time warehouse supervisor finishing his degree after stopping out years ago. He engages mostly at night and his lunch breaks and values clear expectations and meaningful assignments that respect his limited time. Jamal represents 56% of our students who work full-time. These personas should be built from real data. Not guesses. These personas should include things like: - Full-time vs. part-time employment - Parenting and caregiving responsibilities - Transfer or re-entry status - Career goals at enrollment - Time of day they’re most active in the LMS - Devices they use to access class - Barriers to engagement (tech, mental health, housing, etc.) - Competing priorities And here’s a new standard for your courses: At the end of a course build, you should be able to justify every major design decision based on the students you serve. Not just “best practice,” but actual alignment: “This assignment is chunked into 3 stages because 73% of our students are parents and this will help them jump in and out of the classroom easier.” “This course avoids Sunday deadlines because 62% of our students work weekends.” “This early certificate is embedded because 41% are changing careers and need immediate ROI.” This isn’t about adding bells and whistles. It’s about building with care and clarity. Because the student has changed. And the curriculum should show it. Tomorrow: We’ll dive into specific strategies for supporting working adult learners. Those balancing careers and coursework all at once. #TheStudentHasChanged #Retention #CurriculumDesign #InstructionalDesign #StudentSuccess #LearnerPersonas #ModernLearner #HigherEd