𝗜𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗴𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗖𝗹𝗶𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗖𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲 𝗥𝗶𝘀𝗸𝘀 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗼 𝗜𝗻𝗳𝗿𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗿𝘂𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲 𝗗𝗲𝘀𝗶𝗴𝗻 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗠𝗮𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗻𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 Climate change increases not only the likelihood of hazards such as floods and storms but also their intensity and spatial reach. Since most infrastructure projects are designed for lifespans of up to a hundred years, it is essential to integrate climate risks into both design and maintenance planning. Traditionally, engineers have relied on historical data to estimate future risks. For example, the likely 100-year flood was calculated from past records, assuming that natural patterns remain constant. The core assumption behind this approach was that the future would behave like the past. This assumption held true until the late 20th century, when climate change began to invalidate it. The climate is now shifting too rapidly for the past to serve as a reliable guide. Therefore, climate change must be considered when estimating design parameters such as flood magnitude or peak discharge. For instance, the design flow for a dam spillway or the capacity of stormwater drains should account for future climate projections. Ignoring these changes can result in under-designed structures that fail under new conditions. As flood intensity increases, so does its spatial extent. Higher floods affect broader areas, expanding floodplains and putting new zones at risk. This expansion raises the cost of infrastructure development since higher safety factors or stronger materials are now required. Governments and institutions must allocate larger budgets for both constructing new infrastructure and maintaining existing ones. Existing infrastructure faces similar challenges. Structures built decades ago are now exposed to higher stresses than they were designed for, which increases the risk of deterioration and failure. This not only raises maintenance costs but also threatens human lives and economic stability. The dam break in Libya in 2023 is a tragic example. Beyond flooding, climate change alters river flows, reduces water availability, and increases the duration of dry seasons, affecting irrigation systems and hydropower generation. Urban drainage networks can be overwhelmed by intense storms, while rising temperatures reduce road lifespan and raise energy demand for cooling facilities. To conclude, it is now clear that the future will not resemble the past. Relying solely on historical data for infrastructure design is no longer practical. Engineers and policymakers must integrate climate projections into every stage of the infrastructure lifecycle. Doing so not only prevents failures but also protects public finances and ensures the sustainability of investments. Building climate-resilient infrastructure is therefore not only a technical requirement but also an economic necessity. The cost of inaction will always exceed the cost of preparedness.
Climate Science Integration in Engineering Practices
Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.
Summary
Integrating climate science into engineering practices means using scientific knowledge about climate change to inform the way we design, build, and maintain infrastructure, ensuring it can withstand new and unpredictable environmental challenges. This approach adapts traditional engineering methods to account for shifting weather patterns, rising sea levels, and other climate-driven changes, making our built environment more resilient for communities and businesses.
- Update design criteria: Shift from relying on old records to using climate projections and models when determining safety standards for structures, roads, and utility systems.
- Plan for extremes: Include scenarios like heavier storms, higher flood risks, and longer heatwaves in project planning to avoid costly failures and keep people safe.
- Collaborate across fields: Bring engineers, climate scientists, and urban planners together to create solutions that protect communities and support long-term sustainability.
-
-
#FloodModelling#Rajesh Kumar Mahana Excellent Work by Mr. Rajesh Kumar Mahana: Highlighting the significance of numerical flood modelling, specifically utilizing Mike Flood, in urban development planning. The study reveals the intricate relationship among floodplain hydraulics, embankment protection, and the effects of climate change on water levels. - **Hydraulic Profiles:** The longitudinal section and embankment profile showcase the critical impact of a 2% increase in flood/tidal levels due to climate change (IPCC AR6, 2022) on freeboard and overtopping risk. This aligns with USACE HEC-RAS and Eurocode flood defense design principles, emphasizing the necessity of testing various climate scenarios for levee resilience. - **Water Depth Mapping:** The inundation depth map, generated through 2D coupled hydrodynamic modeling (MIKE 21 + MIKE 11), effectively delineates flood extents and identifies vulnerable zones within the proposed town planning scheme. Following WMO Guidelines on Integrated Flood Management (2009), such mapping plays a crucial role in land-use zoning and prioritizing protective measures. - **Catchment & Infrastructure Integration:** Integrating catchment boundaries, highways, and planned development layouts, the model merges hydrology with urban infrastructure. This practice mirrors global standards (e.g., EU Floods Directive 2007/60/EC, NDMA Floodplain Zoning Guidelines, India 2008) that emphasize connecting hydraulic risk with planning decisions. - **Climate Resilience:** Contrasting water levels "with" and "without" climate change highlights the concept of non-stationarity in hydrology (Milly et al., Science, 2008), now recognized in WMO and IPCC design manuals. Traditional return-period-based designs fall short; models must simulate probabilistic climate-adjusted scenarios. This initiative showcases how numerical flood modeling facilitates: - Climate-resilient embankment design - Floodplain zoning for new urban areas - Integrated flood risk management amalgamating structural and non-structural measures.
-
Climate Change & Process Safety: The Growing Connection Extreme weather events are no longer rare occurrences—they are becoming more frequent, more intense, and more unpredictable due to climate change. The U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (CSB) safety alert on hurricane risks highlights a crucial reality: climate resilience must be a core part of process safety. Case in Point: Arkema Chemical Plant Incident (2017) Hurricane Harvey’s unprecedented flooding led to equipment failure, chemical decomposition, and a hazardous release—forcing evacuations and medical emergencies. The incident revealed a critical gap in industry preparedness for extreme weather events. Ø Key Takeaways for Industry: a. Risk Assessments Must Evolve: Process safety planning should incorporate climate-related risks such as hurricanes, flooding, and extreme temperatures. b. Updated Design & Infrastructure: Facilities must assess structural resilience, particularly for bulk storage tanks, pressure vessels, and critical equipment. c. Robust Emergency Preparedness: The CCPS guidance on natural hazard assessment is a step forward—companies should actively integrate these insights. d. Safe Startups Post-Disaster: Restarting operations post-extreme weather demands meticulous checks and strict adherence to pre-startup safety reviews (PSSR). The Future of Process Safety = Climate Resilience As process safety professionals, we must connect the dots between climate science and industrial safety. The "new normal" demands proactive strategies, adaptive risk management, and stronger regulatory frameworks to safeguard people, assets, and the environment. Are your facilities prepared for climate-induced hazards? Let’s drive the conversation forward! #ProcessSafety #ClimateResilience #HSE #ChemicalSafety #ExtremeWeather #SafetyCulture
-
If You Had to Design a Bridge Today — How Would You “Climate-Proof” It? Bridges aren’t just about steel and concrete anymore. In today’s world, they need to stand strong against a changing climate. 🌧🌪🌊 When I think about designing a bridge now, I don’t just ask: 💭 “What’s the load?” or “How long is the span?” I also ask: ✅ What if rainfall doubles in the next decade? ✅ What if the river changes course? ✅ Can the soil handle flash floods and erosion? ✅ Will it survive the next unexpected quake? 🌍 Climate change is rewriting the rules of civil engineering—and I believe we need to rewrite our design approach too. 🔎 So I’m reaching out to the engineering and research community here: 👉 How are you integrating climate data into your structural or infrastructure designs? 📊 What tools, models, or case studies are helping you build for the future? Let’s exchange ideas. Let’s rethink resilience. 💡 Because the future needs bridges that last—not just physically, but environmentally too. #ClimateResilience #SustainableEngineering #CivilEngineering #BridgeDesign #AskAnEngineer #LinkedInCommunity #ClimateAdaptation #InfrastructureInnovation
-
𝐅𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐞𝐝𝐠𝐞𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐀𝐧𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐚 𝐭𝐨 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐟𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐟𝐮𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞: 𝐰𝐞’𝐫𝐞 𝐟𝐚𝐜𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐚𝐛𝐫𝐮𝐩𝐭 𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐧𝐞𝐭𝐚𝐫𝐲 𝐬𝐡𝐢𝐟𝐭𝐬—𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐲𝐞𝐬, 𝐰𝐞’𝐥𝐥 𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐟𝐞𝐞𝐥 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐦. Antarctica is no longer a steady, frozen bastion. Recent science reveals staggering, rapid changes: • Sea ice is disappearing at double the rate of the Arctic since 2014—more than 120 km of retreat, far beyond natural variability . • Researchers warn this decline may already be irreversible, with cascading consequences on ice shelves, marine and land ecosystems, and global sea-level rise . • The Southern Ocean’s salt balance has flipped—unexpectedly getting saltier, weakening water layering, allowing deep heat to rise and accelerate ice melt in a dangerous feedback loop . • Our climate “engine” is sputtering: the Antarctic Circumpolar Current (ACC)—vital for regulating global climate—is slowing, with projections showing a potential 20% decline by 2050 under high emissions, posing far-reaching impacts . • Beyond ocean physics, key Antarctic species are under threat as their habitats vanish . 𝐖𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐓𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐌𝐞𝐚𝐧𝐬 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐔𝐬 — 𝐄𝐬𝐩𝐞𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐲 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐮𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐒𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫 Planetary systems are shifting—and our built environment must evolve in response. • Coastal infrastructure will face rising tides, thawing permafrost, and shifting groundwater—all driven by polar instability. • Design specs, materials, and maintenance protocols must anticipate not incremental but non-linear environmental changes. • We’re dealing with a systems-level crisis: interconnected failures demand coordinated, forward-thinking responses—not siloed, reactive fixes. 𝐂𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐭𝐨 𝐀𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧: 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐮𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐒𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐫—𝐓𝐢𝐦𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐁𝐮𝐢𝐥𝐝 𝐑𝐞𝐬𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞, 𝐍𝐨𝐭 𝐉𝐮𝐬𝐭 𝐁𝐮𝐢𝐥𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐬 🏗️ 🏡 🌍 ♻️ It’s time we step up—boldly, strategically, and urgently: • Integrate climate-resilience tools (e.g., sea-level rise models, structural feedback loops) into every project. • Lead in innovating resilient materials and adaptive design systems that withstand unpredictable extremes. • Advocate for policy and standards that prioritize long-term planetary stability over short-term gain. • Collaborate across borders—engineers, urban planners, climate scientists—to co-create infrastructure that sustains humanity and the planet. Let’s shift from reaction to foresight. That’s not just good business—it’s our shared responsibility. 🔗 https://lnkd.in/e72iwNQD 🔎 𝘋𝘰 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘣𝘦𝘭𝘪𝘦𝘷𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘴𝘵𝘳𝘶𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘣𝘶𝘪𝘭𝘵 𝘦𝘯𝘷𝘪𝘳𝘰𝘯𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘴𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘰𝘳 𝘪𝘴 𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘥𝘺 𝘵𝘰 𝘱𝘭𝘢𝘺 𝘪𝘵𝘴 𝘧𝘶𝘭𝘭 𝘱𝘢𝘳𝘵 𝘪𝘯 𝘢𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘤𝘳𝘪𝘴𝘪𝘴? #SustainabilityLeadership SDG 4, 8, 9, 11, 12 & 13 +