Natural Resources Management in Climate Projects

Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.

Summary

Natural resources management in climate projects refers to strategies and practices that balance the use and protection of land, water, and biodiversity to address climate change challenges. This approach emphasizes nature-based solutions and integrated planning, aiming to build ecosystem resilience, safeguard communities, and ensure sustainable use of vital resources.

  • Prioritize integrated planning: Coordinate land, water, and biodiversity actions to prevent unintended tradeoffs, such as choosing tree species that do not threaten local water supplies.
  • Engage diverse stakeholders: Involve local communities, governments, and experts early on to create solutions that address both social needs and environmental goals.
  • Monitor and adapt: Track project outcomes regularly and adjust strategies to account for changing conditions, ensuring climate interventions remain sustainable and beneficial over time.
Summarized by AI based on LinkedIn member posts
  • View profile for Amlan Shome

    Sustainability × (Enterprise Sales, Strategic Partnerships, Stakeholder Engagement, Corporate Communications)

    33,864 followers

    🌍 Disaster risk reduction and climate adaptation strategies are increasingly urgent. To meet this challenge, the 𝐂𝐑𝐌-𝐍𝐛𝐒 Toolkit has been developed to help countries embed nature-based solutions. It brings together environmental knowledge, policy alignment, practical interventions, inclusive governance, and integrated planning. Through this approach, it provides a clear pathway for building resilience while safeguarding ecosystems and human well-being. 𝘌𝘢𝘤𝘩 𝘵𝘰𝘰𝘭 𝘪𝘴 𝘰𝘶𝘵𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘥 𝘣𝘦𝘭𝘰𝘸. 𝐓𝐨𝐨𝐥 1: 𝐒𝐭𝐨𝐜𝐤𝐭𝐚𝐤𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐈𝐧𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 - Countries collect and compile data on environment, climate, hazards, and vulnerabilities to build a risk profile. - Using IPCC’s risk approach and Indigenous knowledge, the stocktake highlights where NbS can deliver the strongest impact. 𝐓𝐨𝐨𝐥 2: 𝐍𝐛𝐒 𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐮𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐏𝐨𝐥𝐢𝐜𝐲 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐏𝐥𝐚𝐧𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠: - National plans and strategies are screened for NbS references through targeted keyword checks. - This process identifies entry points, exposes policy gaps, and ensures new NbS reinforce existing frameworks. 𝐓𝐨𝐨𝐥 3: 𝐆𝐮𝐢𝐝𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐍𝐛𝐒 𝐒𝐞𝐥𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 - The toolkit provides categories and options for selecting NbS tailored to hazards and ecosystems. - Selected measures balance risk reduction with co-benefits such as biodiversity, resilience, and livelihoods. 𝐓𝐨𝐨𝐥 4: 𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐤𝐞𝐡𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐫 𝐄𝐧𝐠𝐚𝐠𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐆𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐧𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐞 - Countries are supported to mobilize stakeholders across institutions, sectors, and governance levels. - It promotes transparent participation that empowers communities and ensures NbS are inclusive and fair. 𝐓𝐨𝐨𝐥 5: 𝐍𝐛𝐒 𝐈𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐠𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐞𝐝 𝐏𝐥𝐚𝐧𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠 - Countries are guided to embed NbS within DRR strategies, adaptation plans, and cross-sector policies. - Global examples and templates illustrate how integration turns scattered efforts into coherent strategies. 𝐒𝐮𝐦𝐦𝐚𝐫𝐲 𝐂𝐡𝐞𝐜𝐤𝐥𝐢𝐬𝐭 - A checklist aligns the five tools in sequence to help countries track their progress. - It ensures a logical, stepwise approach that moves from risk profiling to policy integration. In essence, the CRM-NbS Toolkit is a structured pathway to mainstream nature-based solutions in #disaster and #climaterisk management. By moving from stocktake to integrated planning, countries can build resilience, safeguard ecosystems, and protect people’s well-being against climate change.

  • View profile for Ash W.

    Nature Based Solutions & Biodiversity Specialist | Biodiversity Accounting, Offseting & Markets, Nature Positive & Rewilding

    12,536 followers

    🌍 What if every infrastructure project could deliver for nature and people? A year ago, we set out to answer that by piloting the TNFD LEAP framework on infrastructure projects. At AECOM, we’ve always recognised that nature underpins the success of infrastructure—whether it’s water for energy systems or biodiversity providing resilience to protect assets from climate risks. But the challenge has always been: how do we properly assess this? The focus has always been on protecting nature impacts but infrastructure dependencies are rarely thought about. That’s why we undertook the Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures (TNFD) with Global Canopy and Nature-based Insights, applying the LEAP approach across a range of real-world infrastructure projects. Here’s what we did: 🔍 We assessed nature-related dependencies, from water security to ecosystem services that support asset performance. 📉 We identified impacts on biodiversity and ecosystem condition, including risks to species, habitats, and natural capital. 🌱 We looked for opportunities to deliver nature-positive outcomes, like enhancing biodiversity, restoring ecosystems, and embedding nature-based solutions into project design. 👉 What stood out was how interconnected these risks and opportunities are—and how important it is to consider them early, not as an afterthought. 👉 We also found that the LEAP framework works, but to make it mainstream for infrastructure, we need better data and more sector-specific guidance. 👉 The TNFD framework has highlighted how much more should probably be considered as part of EIAs - we should be considering nature's value and benefits far more than just impacts to ensure dependency resilience. One year on, the insights we gained feel even more relevant. The TNFD is gaining traction, and nature-related risks are climbing higher on the agenda. For infrastructure to be truly sustainable—and resilient—we need to reconsider nature as a beneficial asset that protects infrastructure. Our pilot summary is here if you’d like a deeper dive: 🔗 https://lnkd.in/gNYwcJqT #TNFD #Infrastructure #NaturePositive #Biodiversity #LEAP #FutureOfInfrastructure

  • View profile for Rhett Ayers Butler
    Rhett Ayers Butler Rhett Ayers Butler is an Influencer

    Founder and CEO of Mongabay, a nonprofit organization that delivers news and inspiration from Nature’s frontline via a global network of reporters.

    67,537 followers

    What’s holding back natural climate solutions? Natural climate solutions (NCS)—from reforestation and agroforestry to wetland restoration—have long been championed as low-cost, high-benefit pathways for reducing greenhouse gases. In theory, they could provide over a third of the climate mitigation needed by 2030 to stay under 2°C of warming. But in practice, progress is stalling. A sweeping new PNAS Nexus study reveals why. Drawing on 352 peer-reviewed papers across 135 countries, researchers led by Hilary Brumberg cataloged 2,480 documented barriers to implementing NCS. The obstacles are not ecological. Rather, they are human: insufficient funding, patchy information, ineffective policies, and public skepticism. The result is a vast “implementation gap” between what is technically possible and what is politically, economically, or socially feasible. The analysis found that “lack of funding” was the most commonly cited constraint globally—identified in nearly half of all countries surveyed. Yet it rarely stood alone. Most regions face a tangle of interconnected hurdles. Constraints from different categories often co-occur, compounding difficulties: poor governance erodes trust; disinterest stems from unclear benefits; technical know-how is stymied by bureaucratic confusion. These patterns vary by region and type of intervention. Reforestation projects, for instance, face particularly high scrutiny over equity concerns—especially in the Global South, where land tenure insecurity and historical injustices run deep. Agroforestry and wetland restoration often struggle with the complexity of design and monitoring. Meanwhile, grassland and peatland pathways remain understudied, despite their importance. The study’s most striking insight may be spatial. Countries within the same UN subregion tend to share a similar profile of constraints—more so than across broader development regions. This geographic clustering suggests an opportunity: Supranational collaboration, if properly resourced and attuned to local context, could address shared challenges more efficiently than isolated national efforts. Crucially, the authors argue that piecemeal fixes will not suffice. Because most countries face an average of seven distinct constraints, many from different domains, effective solutions must be integrated and cross-sectoral. Adaptive management—a flexible, feedback-based approach—could help. By identifying which barriers arise at each stage of an NCS project’s lifecycle, it may be possible to design interventions that are not just technically sound, but socially and politically viable. Natural climate solutions still hold vast potential. But unlocking it will require less focus on where trees grow best—and more on where people can make them thrive. 🔬 Brumberg et al 2025. Global analysis of constraints to natural climate solution implementation. PNAS Nexus. https://lnkd.in/gDmYJEph

  • View profile for Eoin Murray

    Nature Finance

    15,778 followers

    Leading the way in Water Management 💧 As the pressures of climate change, population growth, and biodiversity loss mount, innovative approaches to water management are critical. Across the UK, good to see leading water companies embracing Nature-Based Solutions (NBS) to address these challenges sustainably, combining traditional engineering with the power of nature. Here’s how Anglian Water, South West Water, and United Utilities are transforming the landscape with NBS initiatives: 1. Anglian Water: Pioneering natural resilience: ~ Holistic catchment management: programmes like their Pioneering Catchment Schemes work with farmers to prevent pollution at its source, ensuring better water quality before it even reaches treatment plants ~ Natural Flood Management: By restoring floodplains, Anglian helps protect communities while improving habitats for wildlife ~ Blue-green infrastructure projects: In urban areas, Anglian promotes solutions such as sustainable drainage systems (SuDS) to manage rainfall and reduce urban flooding 2. South West Water: Upstream Thinking: ~ Partnerships w/ landowners: Collaborating w/ farmers, SWW reduces agricultural runoff, improving water quality and reducing treatment costs ~ Wetland Restoration: Projects in areas like Exmoor and Dartmoor restore natural landscapes, enhancing biodiversity and improving water retention to mitigate drought risks ~ Flood risk management: By slowing water flow and restoring natural channels, South West Water addresses flooding while creating habitats for wildlife 3. United Utilities: Unlocking nature's potential: ~ National leadership: Their £8.9 million national programme, in collaboration with The Rivers Trust and others, explores solutions such as peatland restoration and constructed wetlands to enhance water quality and resilience ~ Integrated planning in PR24: United Utilities’ forward-thinking PR24 strategy emphasises embedding NBS across operations, from raw water protection to wastewater management These initiatives highlight a shift toward solutions that work in harmony with nature, providing long-term benefits for communities, ecosystems, and water management systems. Why it matters?: NBS are more than just good environmental practice—they’re cost-effective, sustainable, and community-friendly. By reducing reliance on energy-intensive treatments and hard infrastructure, NBS help tackle some of the UK’s most pressing water management challenges, from flooding to water quality and biodiversity loss. Nature as Critical Business infrastructure. 💡 A Call to Action These pioneering projects show the transformative potential of NBS. For water companies, governments, and communities alike, the opportunity lies in scaling up these initiatives and embedding them into everyday practices. Let’s celebrate and amplify these efforts, driving innovation and sustainability in water management for future generations. 💧🌱 #NBS #NFM #UKWater

Explore categories