I've seen too many enterprise software companies get caught with customers in the 𝗙𝗲𝗲𝗱𝗯𝗮𝗰𝗸 𝗧𝗿𝗮𝗽: • Promise too much = lose focus • Listen too little = lose trust I was super lucky to have two incredibly product-minded co-founders in Ted and Joshua. Of the many things I learned from them, one that has really stuck with me is that while customers understand their pain points better than anyone, they're not best positioned to solve that pain - they're too close to it and just don't have as many data points across variants of that pain, resulting in a failure of imagination as to the optimal solution. Customer feedback is absolute gold, but that doesn't mean every nugget should get directly translated into the product roadmap. The topic came up during the AMA after our Logicbroker All Hands last week - here's what I shared with my team: 1. 𝗟𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗻 𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗹𝘆 - Make sure the customer is heard and build a 3D model of their pain in your head by probing into the granular details of what they're dealing with 2. 𝗦𝗲𝘁 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗲𝗰𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗲𝗮𝗿𝗹𝘆 - Thank them for the feedback and communicate how this will inform related product research as we work towards an optimal solution 3. 𝗘𝘅𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗱𝘂𝗰𝘁 𝗲𝗱𝘂𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 - Have we already solved this pain point, but in a counterintuitive way? Educate the customer on how other clients are successfully handling this today. Encourage them to try it out and share back additional feedback to round out our understanding 4. 𝗗𝗼𝗰𝘂𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗳𝗲𝗲𝗱𝗯𝗮𝗰𝗸 - Advocate for clients by employing methodologies like RICE (Reach x Impact x Confidence / Effort) to map feedback to prospective projects in a structured way that will automatically reprioritize initiatives as incremental data points are collected over time 5. 𝗙𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄 𝘂𝗽 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘀𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗹𝘆 - In subsequent client QBRs, share new learnings around initiatives their feedback has matured. Be transparent about where they fall in the company's priorities and update on new related releases that may partially address their original pain point Valuing customer feedback and protecting the product roadmap are not mutually exclusive. These two goals are inherently intertwined and mutually reinforcing. Building every client request will degrade the product, but ignoring client feedback will also degrade the product - it's a fine balance. Customers don't need a 'yes' - they need to be able to trust that you're listening and leading with purpose.
Handling Feedback From Clients Gracefully
Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.
Summary
Handling feedback from clients gracefully means approaching client input with openness, empathy, and a focus on solutions, ultimately building stronger relationships and trust.
- Listen with intention: Pay close attention to client concerns without interrupting, and ask thoughtful follow-up questions to fully understand their perspectives.
- Communicate honestly: Set clear expectations about how feedback will be used, and update clients consistently on any progress or decisions related to their input.
- Take meaningful action: Address valid feedback promptly and transparently, and demonstrate your commitment by following through on promises to make improvements.
-
-
The other day, something rare happened. An employer gave us a mediocre review after an event. Not bad, just not the level of satisfaction we’re used to. We didn’t dwell on it - we leaned into it. Here’s what we do when we get constructive feedback: First, we share it with the team - immediately. Everyone needs to know where we can improve. Then, we take action. In this case, we reached out to the employer directly and said: "Tell us everything. What happened? How could we do better?" The employer’s response was eye-opening. First, the issue turned out to be much smaller than we initially thought - a minor hiccup, really. Second, the employer was blown away by how seriously we took their input. They appreciated that we didn’t just listen - we acted. By the end of the conversation, they were not only satisfied but impressed. Our quick response turned a so-so review into a moment of trust and connection. Moments like this are why we have a clear process for handling feedback: Share it. Act on it. Improve from it. It’s more than customer service - it’s about showing that we value input and take it seriously. Internally, it reinforces a culture of accountability and action. Externally, it builds trust and loyalty. If you’re serious about serving your customers, don’t just hear them. Act. It’s the difference between good service and great relationships.
-
Had an interesting conversation last week with a founder who was ready to walk away from a client a few months ago. The issue? A massive misunderstanding on project scope that spiraled into a heated argument. Instead of calling it quits, he did something simple but worked- He called the client and started with, “I think we’re misaligned. Help me understand where things went off track.” No defensiveness. No excuses. Just a question. It defused the tension immediately. They laid out all the frustrations, and he just listened. Next question - “What does success look like from here?” That one shifted the conversation from blame to solution. They ended up not only saving the relationship but also closing a bigger deal with them the following month. It made me realize this: Most client conflicts aren’t about the actual problem. They’re about feeling unheard and misunderstood.. Similar to personal relationships outside of work. I’ve seen this happen and workout by doing the following- Acknowledge the frustration. Even if you disagree. Ask what success looks like. It shifts the focus from the past to the future. Make a commitment—and follow through. Even if it’s just a small step, action rebuilds trust. Conflicts are going to happen. But if you lean into them with curiosity instead of combativeness, you’ll not only solve the issue but also strengthen the relationship. What do you do when you're lost in the woods ? Start with one step.