Just saw Target CEO Brian Cornell's all-staff email addressing company challenges. As someone who's spent years advising execs on crisis comms, I just have one question: What was the point? He admits "silence from us has created uncertainty" (correctly identifying the problem) but then immediately creates more uncertainty (by not actually articulating a solution to said problem). Instead of explaining WHY leadership went silent during critical company challenges or what they were deliberating behind closed doors, he skips straight to vague reassurances. In my opinion, this is a pretty fundamental communications failure because transparency without context is just another form of opacity. The email positions Target as a passive victim ("things are happening TO us") rather than an active decision-maker ("we made choices that had consequences"). Consider: > Target has had 11 straight weeks of declining foot traffic > They've rolled back DEI initiatives, triggering boycotts > They've been hit with significant tariff impacts Yet NONE of these are directly addressed in the email. Instead, 40,000 employees get a nothing-burger email with vague references to values being "non-negotiable" and products being "second to none" (while customers are literally shopping elsewhere). Here's what probably happened: Someone in the C-suite said "We need to say SOMETHING!" and this vague, purpose-free email was the result. The perfect example of what happens when the goal is "send an email" instead of "solve a problem." If I were advising you Brian, here's what I would have told you: 1. Get specific. Name the actual issues (DEI rollbacks, declining sales, tariffs, declining consumer confidence) directly instead of vague references to "headlines and social media." 2. Own your decisions. Say "we made this choice because..." not "things are happening around us." 3. Skip the robot speak. "Our values are non-negotiable. Period." sounds defensive, it does not confident. 4. Share a real plan. Not just "you'll hear from us more" but exactly how and when. What's on the roadmap? Is there a roadmap? 5. Keep it simple. An email written by a patchwork of people and lawyers and IR teams will never sound authentic or clear. What would you have told Brian in this scenario?
How Leaders Misuse Email for Tough Conversations
Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.
Summary
Many leaders misuse email for tough conversations by relying on vague or impersonal messages to address sensitive issues, which often leads to confusion, anxiety, and a breakdown of trust within their teams. Misusing email in this way means leaders avoid direct, clear communication when tackling important or challenging topics, making employees feel uncertain and undervalued.
- Choose direct dialogue: Use personal conversations or meetings for difficult topics instead of mass emails to create reassurance and understanding among your team.
- Be specific and transparent: Clearly address the real issues and explain your decisions in detail, rather than sending ambiguous or generic updates.
- Set the emotional tone: Acknowledge how changes might make people feel and provide enough context so your message doesn’t spark unnecessary worry.
-
-
🚨 The Email That Made 200 Employees Panic The subject line read: “We need to talk.” That was it. No context. No explanation. Within minutes, the office air felt heavier. You could hear chairs creak as people leaned toward each other, whispering: 👉 “Did you see the mail?” 👉 “Do you think layoffs are coming?” 👉 “Why would he say that without details?” The silence in the cafeteria was louder than usual that day. Coffee cups stayed untouched, half-filled. Some stared at their screens, pretending to work, but their fingers hesitated above the keyboard. One manager later told me it felt like “a ticking clock in the background you can’t turn off.” What was meant to be a simple one-on-one call turned into an organization-wide anxiety spiral. Productivity dipped. Trust cracked. By evening, HR’s inbox was full of panicked questions. ⸻ 💡 When I stepped in as a trainer, the leader admitted: “I just didn’t think one line could create so much fear.” And that’s the truth: Leaders often underestimate the power of their words. A vague message is like sending a flare into the sky—everyone sees it, no one knows what it means, but everyone assumes the worst. We worked together on Crisis Communication Frameworks: • Lead with clarity: “I’d like to connect regarding Project X progress this Friday.” • Add emotional context: “No concerns—just a quick alignment call.” • Close with certainty: “This will help us stay on track as a team.” The difference? Next time he wrote an email, instead of panic, his team replied with thumbs-up emojis. Calm replaced chaos. ⸻ 🎯 Learning: Leadership isn’t just about strategy—it’s about how you sound in the small moments. One vague sentence can break trust. One clear message can build it back. If your leaders are unintentionally creating chaos through unclear communication, let’s talk. Because the cost of poor communication isn’t just morale—it’s millions. ⸻ #LeadershipCommunication #CrisisCommunication #ExecutivePresence #LeadershipSkills #CommunicationMatters #Fortune500 #TopCompanies #CXOLeadership #FutureOfWork #OrganizationalExcellence #StorytellingForLeaders #LeadershipDevelopment #CorporateTraining #ProfessionalGrowth #PeopleFirstLeadership
-
Your title doesn't make you a leader. How you choose to communicate with your employees does. Once had a manager who taught me exactly how NOT to lead. The catch? They saw leadership as decisions, not dialogue: → Mass emails replaced one-on-one conversations → Big changes announced in email blasts → Only gave feedback during formal annual reviews Here's what they didn't see happening: 1/ Our team's confidence crumbled daily → Every casual hallway conversation became a potential intel-gathering mission → People second-guessed their work, wondering what they didn't know → Creative energy drained into anxiety about "what's next?" 2/ Their performance quietly suffered → Decisions slowed to a crawl—nobody wanted to move without "the full picture" → Innovation stopped—why build something that might not align with hidden plans? → Collaboration fractured as information inequality grew 3/The final blow? Trust vanished → Top performers started playing it safe instead of taking smart risks → The "open door policy" became a joke—nobody believed it → Exit interviews all said the same thing: "I never knew where I stood" Here's the truth about leadership: When you don't create communication channels, you create anxiety channels. The best leaders know: It's not about more communication. It's about human communication. ✓ Quick morning huddles over lengthy emails ✓ Walking the floor instead of waiting for reports ✓ Real conversations instead of formal presentations Your team would rather hear imperfect news directly from you than piece it together through gossip. What's your most effective communication channel with your team? P.S. What's your #1 communication channel with your team? ♻️ Repost to help your network build stronger teams ➕ Follow me, Jill Avey for more leadership insights