Want to stop triggering defensive reactions in critical conversations? Brain science reveals a simple technique that's transforming how top companies communicate: As an executive coach, this is the first thing I teach founders who are struggling with critical relationships. Why? Because it's consistently the most powerful tool for transforming toxic communication into productive dialogue. When you're fighting with your co-founder, your brain's threat response system activates. This shuts down the exact parts of your brain needed for effective communication. But there's a way to keep those neural pathways open. It's called speaking inarguably - using only facts that can't be disputed. Instead of "You don't care about this company" (judgment) Say "When you missed our last three meetings, I felt worried about our partnership" (fact) The first triggers defense mechanisms. The second creates psychological safety. There are two types of inarguable statements: • External facts: Observable behaviors, metrics, documented events • Internal facts: Your sensations, emotions, thoughts ("I feel frustrated") I've seen this technique help to transform toxic co-founder relationships into thriving partnerships more times than I can count. Here's how to start: 1. Pause before responding to emotionally charged situations 2. Strip away interpretations, focus only on observable facts ("You arrived 15 minutes late" vs "You're disrespectful") 3. Own your internal experience ("I felt anxious when that happened" vs "You're stressing everyone out") 4. Practice radical honesty about your feelings (This builds trust faster than pretending to be perfect) The hardest part? Letting go of being right. Your interpretations might feel true, but they're just stories you're telling yourself. This is where inner work meets leadership. When you master this, difficult conversations become growth opportunities. Your leadership emerges naturally from who you are, not who you think you should be.
Approaches for Addressing Personal Issues at Work
Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.
Summary
Addressing personal issues at work involves thoughtful communication strategies to resolve conflicts or challenges while maintaining professionalism and trust.
- Pause and assess: Before reacting to sensitive situations, take a moment to calm your emotions and focus on observable facts rather than assumptions.
- Use "I" statements: Express your concerns by owning your feelings, such as saying, "I feel overwhelmed when deadlines overlap," instead of placing blame on others.
- Prepare with purpose: Map out your conversation goals, key points, and potential questions to ensure clarity and empathy during discussions.
-
-
Over the past 5 years I learned how to make confrontation a conversation. For years, I avoided confrontation. It was uncomfortable, and I wanted to be liked. I was very immature in my thinking. So, I’d ignore the tough topics, let things slide, and convince myself that keeping the peace was worth more than speaking up. But here’s the truth: that mindset held me back, both personally and professionally. When I stopped avoiding confrontation, I started seeing massive growth. Here’s why addressing confrontation is smart and GOOD for business: 🟢 Prevents Miscommunication: Avoiding confrontation can cause misunderstandings to fester. When you address things head-on, you clear the air and ensure everyone’s on the same page. 🟢 Fosters Trust: People appreciate honesty. Even if the conversation is difficult, addressing issues with integrity shows you respect both yourself and your colleagues. 🟢 Drives Progress: Problems don’t disappear when we ignore them. In fact, they often get bigger. By addressing them directly, we create opportunities for real solutions and growth. Now, let’s talk about how to do this tactfully. Cause the HOW is huge when it comes to this. When I talk about confrontation, I don’t mean a heated debate so you have to be thoughtful in your approach. Here are 5 ways to turn confrontation into a productive conversation in the workplace: 1️⃣ Start with Empathy: Understand the other person’s point of view first. Approach the conversation with curiosity, not blame. 2️⃣ Focus on the Issue, Not the Person: Address behaviors or outcomes, not character flaws. Keep it solution-focused. 3️⃣ Use "I" Statements: Own your feelings. For example, “I feel frustrated when…” vs. “You always…” 4️⃣ Stay Calm & Collected: Keep your emotions in check. If needed, take a breather before speaking. 5️⃣ Offer Solutions: Confrontation without a path forward is just complaining. Be ready to suggest ways to move forward. Other things to consider are the when, where and with whom. Try to time the conversation well and determine the best medium. Maybe Slack isn’t the best mechanism for this type of conversation. Lastly, think about who’s in the room. Think about whether or not this should be a private conversation or if it’s better suited for and with a group. Next time you’re facing confrontation, remember: it’s not about winning, it’s about growing. Don’t shy away from these conversations—they’ll make you, your team, and your business stronger.
-
My trick for successfully managing a difficult conversation? A conversation map. This is a skill that Guillaume Wiatr taught me more than a decade ago. I've probably butchered his initial training on it but it's a skill that I continue to revisit and refine for myself. Every time I need to address something important with a team member or client, I open a google doc and map out a few key points: 1. What is my goal for this conversation? This is important: Do I want to learn something? Do I need to communicate boundaries? Are there next steps that need to be addressed? I write it down. 2. Then I map out my opening statement and try to keep it to 3ish sentences. This practice helps me avoid small talk at the beginning of the conversation, which can sometimes derail me. It also forces me to find the clearest and briefest way to get to the point. 3. I identify 2-3 questions I have for the other person. I find that difficult conversations often require us to step back from our assumptions/view and to learn something. So, I balance my opening statement against a few questions that seek feedback and understanding. This step can help me adjust my strategy half way through a difficult conversation and is usually THE piece that allows us both to leave the conversation, feeling good about it. 4. I consider their pushback/questions and how I might respond. 5. If possible, I share it with someone else to see if I'm being clear, fair, and productive with my map. 6. "Bonus" points: If the difficult conversation needs to be documented, you've already got your paper trail. Often times, my map won't take more than 1/2 a page. But even something this small can offer a lot of value. And, in case you're wondering...no....I don't usually deploy the oreo cookie approach. Similar to my comments on small talk, I think the compliment sandwich muddies the waters and offers the potential for sidelining the true purpose. I believe it's better to simply approach difficult conversations with empathy, clarity and openness.