Over the past few weeks, I’ve had several conversations with talent and learning leaders to better understand their priorities and perspective on the future. A recurring theme has been the work of those leading enterprise-wide transformation. These aren’t small, isolated projects, but bold efforts to fundamentally reshape how their organizations operate. Whether it’s rethinking company culture, driving skills-based initiatives, expanding career mobility, adopting AI, managing large-scale transformation, or implementing new leadership frameworks. These leaders are operating at the intersection of business strategy, people development, and organizational change. A question I often hear is: “What separates the most successful efforts from the rest?” After these conversations and dozens of guests on The Edge of Work, a few powerful patterns have emerged. Here are four that consistently show up: 🔶 Systems Thinking: They don’t approach these initiatives as standalone projects. Instead, they embed them into the full talent system, connecting culture, skills, mobility, leadership, and strategy into one cohesive ecosystem. Silos are broken. Work aligns to enterprise goals. 🔶 Coalition Building: While they’re accountable for outcomes, they don’t go it alone. These leaders act less like the “sage on the stage” and more like the “guide on the side,” bringing others along, building ownership across functions, and fostering collective success. 🔶 Change as a Practice: Change isn’t a task list; it’s a muscle. These leaders treat change management as an ongoing practice, embedding it into daily work, meeting people where they are (not just what the spreadsheet says) and continually reinforcing new behaviors to sustain momentum. 🔶 Business First Orientation: They lead as business strategists first. While deeply skilled in talent, they speak first in the native language of their business stakeholders, (then their own) connect initiatives to enterprise outcomes, and position people strategies as drivers of organizational performance. These are just a few of the themes I’ve observed. If you're leading enterprise-wide talent, skills, career, or AI initiatives, what resonates? What would you add? I’d love to hear your perspective. #talent #futureofwork #leadership
Change Readiness Insights From Successful Leaders
Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.
Summary
Change-readiness insights from successful leaders focus on preparing organizations and individuals to navigate transformation with resilience, collaboration, and adaptability. These insights emphasize proactive strategies and continuous practices to make change a sustainable and collaborative process, avoiding common pitfalls like resistance or burnout.
- Embed change holistically: Treat change as a system-wide effort by aligning culture, leadership, and strategic goals, rather than tackling it as isolated projects.
- Build trust through participation: Involve employees in decision-making processes to foster ownership and reduce resistance; collaboration leads to faster adoption and smoother transitions.
- Create feedback loops: Establish mechanisms like surveys or open forums to identify hidden challenges and respond with actionable solutions to maintain morale and momentum.
-
-
Change Capacity: How to Build It Before You Need It Following my post on change fatigue, I got a few messages asking about proactive solutions. The answer? Deliberately building change capacity before you need it. At one time I was working on successfully implementing a major tech transformation while adapting to regulatory changes and updating the staffing model. Our secret wasn't better project management—it was intentionally building change capacity across three dimensions: 𝗜𝗻𝗱𝗶𝘃𝗶𝗱𝘂𝗮𝗹 𝗰𝗮𝗽𝗮𝗰𝗶𝘁𝘆: We invested in resilience training for all employees, teaching practical techniques for managing uncertainty. Research from MIT shows this approach reduces resistance by up to 32%. 𝗧𝗲𝗮𝗺 𝗰𝗮𝗽𝗮𝗰𝗶𝘁𝘆: We established "change champions"—not just to communicate but to protect team bandwidth and raise the red flag when implementation timing and sequence needed to be negotiated. 𝗢𝗿𝗴𝗮𝗻𝗶𝘇𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗰𝗮𝗽𝗮𝗰𝗶𝘁𝘆: Most crucially, we implemented a "change absorption index"—a simple measure of how much change each user group was processing at any time. When a unit approached 80% of their maximum capacity, new initiatives were automatically sequenced. 📊 Quick Change Capacity Audit: - Do people know where to direct their concerns about change overload? - Can managers successfully negotiate implementation timing? - Does your organization measure and track change absorption? - Are change initiatives deliberately sequenced or randomly deployed? The potential ROI is there: imagine faster implementation times and higher adoption rates when change isn't saturated. In today's environment, change capacity isn't just a nice-to-have—it's the difference between organizations that thrive through disruption and those that merely survive. How is your organization deliberately building change capacity? Have you established formal mechanisms or is it still managed ad hoc? #ChangeManagement #OrganizationalResilience #TransformationLeadership #ChangeCapacity
-
"If you have to force change, you've already failed." This became painfully clear when I learned why the majority of organizational transformations collapse… Last week, in a workshop with Tamsen Webster, MA, MBA, I learned a term that fundamentally altered how I view organizational psychology: Reactance. I now call it "The Corporate Immune System" - and it's quietly destroying your change initiatives. Here's the counterintuitive truth most leaders miss: The harder you push for change, the stronger the organizational antibodies become against it. Consider this paradox: When you mandate transformation, you simultaneously create its greatest obstacle. When you force evolution, you guarantee devolution. When you demand innovation, you breed stagnation. HARD TRUTH: Your brain has a freedom detector. And when it senses a threat, it doesn't just resist - it architects elaborate systems of opposition. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗦𝗰𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝗦𝘂𝗰𝗰𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗳𝘂𝗹 𝗖𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲: 1. The Autonomy Principle "Don't push the boulder. Build the slope." * Every forced change creates an equal and opposite resistance * The energy you spend overcoming resistance could have been spent creating momentum * Psychological safety isn't a buzzword - it's the foundation of transformation 𝟮. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗣𝗮𝗿𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗶𝗽𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗣𝗮𝗿𝗮𝗱𝗼𝘅 "𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝗹𝗼𝘄𝗲𝘀𝘁 𝘄𝗮𝘆 𝘁𝗼 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗼 𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗰𝗲 𝗶𝘁" * Speed of implementation ≠ Speed of integration * Involvement beats compliance by a factor of 4 * The time you "waste" in collaboration is recovered tenfold in execution 𝟯. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗟𝗲𝗮𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗽 𝗟𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗴𝗲 𝗣𝗼𝗶𝗻𝘁 "𝗖𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲 𝗵𝗮𝗽𝗽𝗲𝗻𝘀 𝗮𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗲𝗱 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗿𝘂𝘀𝘁, 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗲𝗱 𝗼𝗳 𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗰𝗲" * Trust is the hidden multiplier in all transformation equations * Authority can mandate behavior but never belief * The best change strategies make resistance harder than adoption Here's what the research shows: * 70% of change programs fail to meet their objectives (McKinsey) * Projects with excellent change management are 6x more likely to succeed (Prosci) * Organizations with effective change management practices report 143% higher ROI compared to those with minimal change management (Prosci) Intellectual humility moment: I had to unlearn a decade of "best practices" to understand this fundamental truth - the most effective change feels chosen, not imposed. What conventional wisdom about change leadership do you need to unlearn? #OrganizationalPsychology #ChangeManagement #LeadershipScience Tamsen Webster - Your reactance framework revolutionized my approach to change.
-
Even the best leadership teams get surprised by resistance. Not because they’re doing something wrong, but because 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗮𝗹𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘄𝗮𝘀𝗻’𝘁 𝘃𝗶𝘀𝗶𝗯𝗹𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗲. When leaders don’t have structured ways to surface what’s really happening, change gets slower, harder, and more painful than it needs to be. Allison Wright and I once worked with a leadership team that had no listening posts to hear how a large transformation was shaping their employees' daily lives. When we set them up, here’s what leaders discovered: ⏳ Employees were working late nights, struggling to keep up. 🤷♂️ Decision-making was painfully slow at every level. 🚧 Each day felt exhausting due to a lack of direction. Without realizing it, leaders had created an environment where change was burning people out instead of moving them forward. But once they saw the full picture, they were able to take action. They: ✅ Gave employees their time back by reprioritizing work. ✅ Clarified decision-making to remove roadblocks. ✅ Rebuilt trust by acting on feedback. Want to uncover hidden risks before they slow you down? Start with these three steps: 1️⃣ Create listening posts. Don’t assume silence is agreement. Use pulse surveys, focus groups, skip-level meetings, or informal check-ins to surface real feedback. 2️⃣ Ask the uncomfortable questions. Instead of “Is this working?” try: "What’s frustrating about this change?" and/or "Where are we slowing you down instead of enabling you?" 3️⃣ Act on what you hear. Employees don’t expect perfection, but they do expect leaders to acknowledge pain points and take action. Even small adjustments rebuild trust. The best leaders don’t just drive change, they expand their visibility. What’s helped you uncover blind spots in change? #ChangeLeadership #Change #Leadership #Blindspots #Visibility