Metrics to Assess Long-Term Business Strategy Impact

New CMO: We're moving 50% of the marketing budget to brand / top of funnel. VP Growth: Hell no. My ROAS will drop, and my bonus depends on hitting a ROAS target. New CMO: Not anymore. Your bonus is tied to two metrics: 1. Total contribution dollars generated by the business (at 35% contribution margin). 2. Contribution dollar lifetime value (rolling 30, 60, 180, and 365 days) for our owned business. VP Growth: wtf?! How can I own this? New CMO: Metrics aren't about individual ownership—they're team-driven. The real challenge is choosing the right ones. VP Growth: How do we know these are the right metrics? New CMO: The right metrics grow business health and fundamental enterprise value. If we increase these metrics, while keeping fixed costs flat, we become more profitable. Are they perfect? Maybe not. But they're miles better than short-term ROAS or new customers acquired, which have far less of a direct connection to fundamental business health when we increase those numbers. VP Growth: How can you say that? New CMO: For ROAS, you can hit any number by: 1. Spending less. 2. Doubling down on branded keywords, existing customers, or retargeting. 3. Running more discount events. But ROAS lacks incentives to drive incremental revenue—what actually grows the business—and says nothing about the cost to generate it. And for new customers acquired, there is no notion of customer quality. A massive sale drives high ROAS but attracts discount hunters who won't buy at full price unless we run bigger sales. Both of these metrics lack context on quality and long term profit, which is ultimately the fundamental goal of business. VP Growth: Ok, I'll buy that, but how can I be responsible for overall contribution dollars? New CMO: As a singular individual, you can't. That's why half of your budget will now be based on team performance. For you though, it'll drive you to make better decisions with how you spend our marketing dollars VP Growth: What do you mean? New CMO: You're free from short-term ROAS pressure to pad stats and can focus on incremental profitable growth. You can step back and do the things you know are right to drive net new incremental demand (meaning: you would not have gotten that revenue if you didn't spend that ad dollar) even if it's low ROAS. VP Growth: And the mythical purse string holders are bought in? New CMO: Yup - the CFO and board now understand that the real goal for our marketing investments is both short and long term incremental contribution dollar generation at the highest possible contribution margin. That was my one condition for agreeing to accept the offer to join VP Growth: Well butter my biscuits, let's do this. New CMO: Please never say that again

GCC Leaders: Are You Measuring What Truly Matters? To measure the real impact of your Global Capability Center (GCC), you must go beyond traditional operational KPIs like cost savings or headcount. Those are hygiene. What truly matters is how your GCC moves the needle for the business. Here are 5 strategic metrics every GCC leader should track: 1. Value Delivered per Dollar Spent Why it matters: Shows how effectively the GCC converts investment into business outcomes. How to measure: • Business value (e.g., product revenue, productivity gains, IP created) / Total GCC cost • Can be benchmarked against alternative models (outsourcing, onshore) 2. Time to Market Acceleration Why it matters: Reflects the GCC’s ability to improve speed of execution for product development, support, or operations. How to measure: • % improvement in release velocity or cycle times after GCC involvement • Lead time from idea to launch before vs. after GCC enablement 3. Innovation Output Why it matters: Indicates contribution toward competitive advantage and future growth. How to measure: • Patents filed, features launched, automation use cases deployed • Number of AI/GenAI initiatives incubated and scaled • New product ideas or MVPs driven from GCC 4. Business Function Ownership & Accountability Why it matters: Measures the maturity and strategic importance of the GCC. How to measure: • % of global business function fully owned or co-owned by GCC (e.g., platforms, support functions, analytics COEs) • Strategic roles (Directors, VPs) based in the GCC • Participation in global decision-making forums 5. Customer or Stakeholder NPS / Satisfaction Score Why it matters: This metric reflects how well the GCC is delivering value—both through the products it helps build and the support it provides to global stakeholders. How to measure: • NPS from external customers using products or services developed by GCC teams • NPS from internal stakeholders on the GCC’s responsiveness, collaboration, and strategic alignment • Qualitative feedback on product quality, innovation, speed of execution, and business understanding If your GCC isn’t driving the business forward, it’s just another offshore team. And in 2025, that’s not enough. Rethink how you measure. Reframe how you lead. Redefine what your GCC stands for. Zinnov Amita Goyal Karthik Padmanabhan Amaresh N. Mohammed Faraz Khan Namita Adavi Dipanwita Ghosh Sagar Kulkarni Hani Mukhey ieswariya Rohit Nair Komal Shah Saurabh Mehta

CMOs call marketing an engine for growth. CFOs call it a primary lever of enterprise value creation. One speaks in brand equity, customer acquisition, engagement, and monetization.  The other speaks in margins and profitability. When these departments don’t align,  ↳ Investments get slashed,  ↳ Performance stalls,  ↳ Growth suffers. But when marketing and finance work with UNIFIED language and data.   Companies make smarter investments. Here are four key metrics that help CMOs and CFOs speak the same language: 1. Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC) Formula: Total marketing spend ÷ New customers acquired CFOs ask, “How much are we spending per new customer? Can we lower it?” CMOs ask, “Which channels bring most efficiency, can we shift our budget?” CFOs want cost control, CMOs want better-performing channels.  ↳ Tracking CAC aligns both executives. 2. Customer Lifetime Value (LTV) Formula: (Avg. Purchase Value × Purchase Frequency × Margin Rate × Activity Rate) CFOs ask, “Are we making enough long-term revenue to justify CAC?” CMOs ask, “Should we increase LTV through engagement or monetization?” A CFO sees it as profitability over time, A CMO sees opportunities. ↳ Higher LTV justifies marketing investment. 3. Cash Payback Period Formula: CAC ÷ Gross Margin per Customer per Month CEOs ask, “How long before we earn back what we spent?” CMOs ask, “Which channels pay back fastest?” CFOs want liquidity, CMOs want reinvestment speed. ↳ A shorter payback period means faster growth cycles and less financial risk. 4. LTV:CAC Formula: Customer Lifetime Value ÷ Customer Acquisition Cost. CFOs ask: "Our financial plan requires a 3x ROI in 3 years-can you deliver?" CMOs ask: "Should I optimize for faster payback or a 3-year LTV:CAC target?" CFOs want financial justification, CMOs want strategic growth. ↳ A shared LTV:CAC view aligns investment decisions. CFOs and CMOs don’t need to agree on everything,  but they do need to align on the data that drives GROWTH. Start with blended performance, Then look at leading indicators for Paid. The last thing you want is debating attribution with a CEO or investor, When you're not even aligned on the core metrics above. Don't manage marketing as an expense,  Manage it as an investment. Track the right numbers, speak the same language, and watch your business grow. Which of these metrics does your company focus on the most? Drop a comment below. * * * I talk about the real mechanics of growth, data, and execution. If that’s what you care about, let’s connect.