How AI Improves Decision-Making in Medicine

Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.

Summary

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming decision-making in medicine by assisting doctors with accurate diagnoses, personalized treatments, and reducing biases in clinical care. By acting as a supportive tool rather than a replacement, AI empowers clinicians to provide more precise and equitable healthcare solutions.

  • Reconsider decisions wisely: Use AI systems to re-evaluate initial medical decisions by incorporating new evidence and challenging existing assumptions.
  • Streamline clinical workflows: Implement AI tools to save time on patient scheduling and streamline processes, allowing more focus on patient-centric care.
  • Ensure human-AI collaboration: Prioritize transparency and use AI to complement physician expertise, ensuring the patient remains at the center of care while maintaining human oversight.
Summarized by AI based on LinkedIn member posts
  • View profile for Dr. Kedar Mate
    Dr. Kedar Mate Dr. Kedar Mate is an Influencer

    Founder & CMO of Qualified Health-genAI for healthcare company | Faculty Weill Cornell Medicine | Former Prez/CEO at IHI | Co-Host "Turn On The Lights" Podcast | Snr Scholar Stanford | Continuous, never-ending learner!

    21,054 followers

    There has been a lot of speculation about how willing physicians will be to accept clinical guidance from AI. It’s an understandably touchy subject. Physicians are rightfully proud of the education, experience and expertise that informs their decisions. So what happens when AI tells them to reconsider? A recent study from colleagues at Stanford found that doctors would revise their medical decisions in light of new AI-generated information. Here are the details (https://lnkd.in/eDsp_zxb): ·      50 physicians were randomized to watch a short video of either a white male or black female patient describing their chest pain using an identical script ·      The physicians made triage, diagnosis, and treatment decisions using any non-AI resources ·      The physicians were then given access to GPT-4 (which they were told was an AI system that had not yet been validated) and allowed to change their decisions. They used it to bring in new evidence, compare treatments and challenge their own beliefs. The non-AI scores were not great: - 47% accuracy in the white male patients and 63% accuracy in the black female group. However, after using AI, - accuracy increased to 65% in the white male group and 80% in the black female group. Not only were the physicians open to changing their decisions using AI, but it made them more accurate without introducing biases. A post-study survey indicated that 90% of physicians expect AI tools to play a significant role in future clinical decision making. The results are encouraging for more accurate and equitable care, and I give credit to the physicians willing to adjust their decisions based on AI input. Buy-in from clinicians and other users is critical for genAI to achieve its full potential.   #HealthcareAI #AIAdoption #HealthTech #GenerativeAI

  • View profile for Howard Rosen

    “There is no “ why? “ in AI” - AI and Health Innovation Strategist, Board Member, Speaker, Author

    14,226 followers

    Revolutionizing Patient Care: From Concept to Clinically Proven Impact I was recently interviewed for an article in Meditech Today exploring how cutting-edge medical technologies are reshaping healthcare, from remote monitoring to AI in oncology. It highlights the power of expert-endorsed innovations to revolutionize treatments and improve patient outcomes worldwide. This resonated deeply with our work at Nova Insughts. We’re driven by the belief that AI can revolutionize patient care, and we’re not just building algorithms; we’re building solutions that directly impact people’s lives. One example I'm particularly proud of is our AI-powered Agent in Oncology. Traditionally, interpreting complex medical images and data relies heavily on specialists, leading to bottlenecks and potential delays. Our AI agent acts as an intelligent assistant for clinicians, addressing these challenges head-on. The impact has been significant: 🔹 60 minutes per day per clinician saved: Freeing up valuable time for patient interaction. 🔹 1,740 hours annually saved in patient scheduling: Simplifying processes and reducing wait times. 🔹 More time for personalized, effective treatment plans: Ultimately improving patient outcomes. Our AI agents are not meant to replace doctors. They're tools to augment expertise, empowering clinicians with better, more informed decision-making. It's a collaborative partnership between humans and AI. What sets our approach apart? Years of experience in development, implementation, and scaling, with a focus on seamless integration. We prioritize transparent AI, providing clear explanations for findings. We work closely with clinicians to minimize disruption and maximize adoption. And, most importantly, we keep the patient at the center of our design. This isn’t just theory; it’s real-world impact. What are your thoughts on the role of AI in empowering clinicians? Share your experiences and insights below! And of course, feel free to DM and I would be happy to discuss your needs #HealthIT #AI #Oncology #MedicalTechnology #Innovation #DigitalHealth #PatientCare #ClinicianEmpowerment #ArtificialIntelligence Spencer Hulse https://lnkd.in/gxQ-KM7M

  • View profile for John Whyte
    John Whyte John Whyte is an Influencer

    CEO American Medical Association

    38,423 followers

    Did you see the recent news??? Microsoft recently unveiled its latest AI Diagnostic Orchestrator (MAI DxO), reporting an impressive 85.5% accuracy on 304 particularly complex cases from the New England Journal of Medicine, compared to just ~20% for physicians under controlled conditions . These results—quadrupling the diagnostic accuracy of human clinicians and more cost-effective than standard pathways — have gotten a lot of buzz. They may mark a significant milestone in clinical decision support and raise both enthusiasm but also caution. Some perspective as we continue to determine the role of AI in healthcare. 1. Validation Is Essential Promising results in controlled settings are just the beginning. We urge Microsoft and others to pursue transparent, peer reviewed clinical studies, including real-world trials comparing AI-assisted workflows against standard clinician performance—ideally published in clinical journals. 2. Recognize the value of Patient–Physician Relations Even the most advanced AI cannot replicate the human touch—listening, interpreting, and guiding patients through uncertainty. Physicians must retain control, using AI as a tool, not a crutch. 3. Acknowledge Potential Bias AI is only as strong as its training data. We must ensure representation across demographics and guard against replicating systemic biases. Transparency in model design and evaluation standards is non-negotiable. 4. Regulatory & Liability Frameworks As AI enters clinical care, we need clear pathways from FDA approval to liability guidelines. The AMA is actively engaging with regulators, insurers, and health systems to craft policies that ensure safety, data integrity, and professional accountability. 5. Prioritize Clinician Wellness Tools that reduce diagnostic uncertainty and documentation burden can strengthen clinician well-being. But meaningful adoption requires integration with workflow, training, and ongoing support. We need to look at this from a holistic perspective. We need to promote an environment where physicians, patients, and AI systems collaborate, Let’s convene cross sector partnerships across industry, academia, and government to champion AI that empowers clinicians, enhances patient care, and protects public health. Let’s embrace innovation—not as a replacement for human care, but as its greatest ally. #healthcare #ai #innovation #physicians https://lnkd.in/ew-j7yNS

Explore categories