How AI Impacts the Role of Human Developers

Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.

Summary

Artificial intelligence is revolutionizing the role of human developers by automating routine coding tasks, enabling them to focus on problem-solving, system design, and overseeing AI-driven workflows. Rather than replacing developers, AI serves as a collaborative tool that enhances productivity and reshapes the skills required for modern software development.

  • Master problem definition: Build expertise in clearly defining problems and creating structured solutions, as AI relies heavily on precise input to generate useful outcomes.
  • Focus on high-level skills: Shift your attention from routine coding to areas such as debugging, architectural thinking, and managing complex systems that require human intuition and strategic oversight.
  • Adapt with AI tools: Experiment with AI-powered development tools to understand their strengths and limitations, and use them to augment your workflow while continuously refining your expertise.
Summarized by AI based on LinkedIn member posts
  • View profile for Taha Kass-Hout, MD, MS

    Global Chief Science and Technology Officer @ GE HealthCare | Transforming Healthcare with AI and Digital Solutions

    18,939 followers

    AI is changing software development, but not in the way many expected. It’s not replacing programmers—it’s shifting the skills they need to succeed. Programming has always been about solving problems, not just writing code. Now, with AI in the mix, the ability to define problems clearly, structure solutions effectively, and debug complex systems is more critical than ever. AI can generate code, but it can’t understand the nuances of a problem or the implicit assumptions behind a solution. That’s still up to developers. Debugging AI-generated code is harder than debugging your own. AI mistakes are different from human mistakes—often subtle, sometimes unpredictable. Code quality and maintainability still matter. Left unchecked, AI-generated code can lead to massive technical debt. The real shift isn’t about writing clever prompts—it’s about managing context. AI doesn’t just need instructions; it needs structured, detailed input. The best results come from those who understand the problem deeply and can translate that understanding into precise guidance. For junior developers, this means the learning curve is steeper. It’s no longer just about mastering syntax—it’s about understanding systems, debugging effectively, and structuring maintainable code. For senior developers, mentorship is more important than ever. The next generation of engineers won’t learn by just watching AI generate code; they’ll learn by working through complex problems with experienced guidance. Ignoring AI isn’t an option. But using it well means recognizing its limits, refining how we work with it, and staying focused on the fundamentals of good software development. AI isn’t the end of programming—it’s a new beginning. Mike Loukides, Tim O'Reilly

  • View profile for Elizabeth Knopf

    Building AI Automation to Grow 7+ figure SMBs | SMB M&A Investor

    6,280 followers

    Is AI automating away coding jobs? New research from Anthropic analyzed 500,000 coding conversations with AI and found patterns that every developer should consider: When developers use specialized AI coding tools: - 79% of interactions involve automation rather than augmentation - UI/UX development ranks among the top use cases - Startups adopt AI coding tools at 2.5x the rate of enterprises - Web development languages dominate:          JavaScript/TypeScript: 31%          HTML/CSS: 28% What does this mean for your career? Three strategic pivots to consider: 1. Shift from writing code to "AI orchestration"     If you're spending most of your time on routine front-end tasks, now's the time to develop skills in prompt engineering, code review, and AI-assisted architecture. The developers who thrive will be those who can effectively direct AI tools to implement their vision. 2. Double down on backend complexity     The data shows less AI automation in complex backend systems. Consider specializing in areas that require deeper system knowledge like distributed systems, security, or performance optimization—domains where context and specialized knowledge still give humans the edge. 3. Position yourself at the startup-enterprise bridge     With startups adopting AI coding tools faster than enterprises, there's a growing opportunity for developers who can bring AI-accelerated development practices into traditional companies. Could you be the champion who helps your organization close this gap? How to prepare: - Learn prompt engineering for code generation - Build a personal workflow that combines your expertise with AI assistance - Start tracking which of your tasks AI handles well vs. where you still outperform it - Experiment with specialized AI coding tools now, even if your company hasn't adopted them - Focus your learning on architectural thinking rather than syntax mastery The developer role isn't disappearing—it's evolving. Those who adapt their skillset to complement AI rather than compete with it will find incredible new opportunities. Have you started integrating AI tools into your development workflow? What's working? What still requires the human touch?

  • View profile for Jean Yang

    Exploring AI 🤖 | Previously founded Akita (acquired by Postman) | Head of Engineering and Product - Observability, Postman

    6,496 followers

    Everybody is talking about how AI will threaten developer jobs. But here's the thing: there are lots of people with a vested interest in having you believe that. 🤨 My take: all engineers will become AI engineers and there will be more software developers jobs than ever before. 🚀 Lots of people are motivated to have you believe that AI is magical and totally different from anything that existed before. Marketing teams who want a second chance for their product; CEOs who want regulators to slow down their competitors. At the end of the day, AI is just the newest platform. Like any new platform, AI supports powerful capabilities that did not exist before. And like all platforms before it, AI is going to empower a whole lot more developers. Whenever a transformational platform comes out, it enables people to build stuff they had no business building before. I grew up during the web revolution: HTML came out when I started kindergarten. Before I learned pre-algebra, I was able to build websites public to the entire world. Later in the 90s, people realizing they could build businesses on top of websites led to the dot-com boom. This led to a lot more demand for software developers than ever before. With this AI stuff, there’s the fear that making it easier to build software will reduce the need for software developers. Historically, this just hasn’t been true: platform shifts have led to new demand for new kinds of software, rather than fewer people building the same kinds of software. With the rise of the cloud, for instance, it no longer became necessary for companies to spend years building their own computing infrastructure. Because software shops no longer bottlenecked on the ability to hire compute and scaling experts, more businesses could become software businesses and demand for app developers increased more than ever. As the software industry shifts to AI-first, app engineers will need to become AI engineers. Organizations that previously bottlenecked on ability to create UIs, or to do CRUD programming, will now be able leverage AI. The bad news: a whole lot of today’s developers work on creating UIs or doing CRUD programming. The good news: it’s not hard for today’s skilled developers to become AI engineers. For many software developers, it’s true that your existing skills no longer give you job security. But a clear-thinking software developer who was building great products on mobile and cloud before can leverage their domain knowledge and software intuitions to build more impactful software even faster using AI. So far, we’re seeing AI empower more people to build more new kinds of software, instead of reducing the total number of people building the same software as before. This is great news for existing software developers. You already have experience with software and now there’s more of it to build! But buckle up; we’re in the middle of a whole lot of change. And after AI, we don’t even know yet what the next shift will be.

  • View profile for Ankit SaaS

    GET B2B LEADS ON DEMAND. Founder Leadplus

    7,156 followers

    ai is fundamentally changing how we ship software. think code generation. ai now writes boilerplate, suggests completions, even crafts entire functions. developers become architects, guiding the ai, not just typing every line. think testing and QA. ai can design test cases, identify bugs, and even predict potential failures. this means faster feedback loops and more resilient software. think deployment. ai optimizes release schedules, monitors for issues, and can automate rollbacks. shipping becomes less risky, more frequent. think project management. ai can analyze progress, predict delays, and optimize resource allocation. it brings a new level of clarity to complex projects. the entire software development lifecycle is being infused with intelligence. from idea to production, ai is an active partner. this isn't about replacing developers. it's about empowering them. freeing them from repetitive tasks to focus on complex problem-solving and innovation. teams that integrate ai deeply into their development workflows will ship faster. they'll build more robust products. they'll out-innovate competitors still stuck in manual processes. the future of software development isn't just about better tools. it's about a smarter, ai-assisted way of building.

  • View profile for Mark Bavisotto

    Entrepreneur | AI Concierge | Tech-Obsessed Operator | Startup Investor | 90s Problem Child Turned AI Ecosystem Architect | BioHacker

    12,059 followers

    𝗪𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗔𝗜 𝗥𝗲𝗽𝗹𝗮𝗰𝗲 90% 𝗼𝗳 𝗖𝗼𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗧𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗬𝗲𝗮𝗿? 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗧𝗿𝘂𝘁𝗵 𝗜𝘀 𝗠𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗡𝘂𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲𝗱 "Anthropic's CEO claims AI will write 90% of code in months—a bold vision, but the real winners won't be those who abandon human developers. They'll be the companies mastering the hybrid approach." The coding landscape is transforming faster than most realize. Dario Amodei's March 2025 prediction that AI will dominate coding has sparked significant discussion across professional networks, with perspectives ranging from enthusiasm to concern. While the timeline may be ambitious, the direction appears increasingly clear. GitHub Copilot's adoption by 77,000 organizations in just two years and McKinsey's 2025 report indicating AI could automate up to 70% of coding tasks signal a fundamental shift that's already in progress. What will distinguish successful organizations in this transition is not how quickly they replace developers with AI, but how strategically they integrate both. The companies making strides in this new era are enhancing their engineering teams by transforming them into AI-augmented units where specialized talent directs increasingly powerful tools. The most successful organizations are building hybrid teams that combine: • AI specialists who understand how to prompt, guide, and quality-check AI-generated code • Strategic architects who design the systems AI helps build • Experienced developers who provide the contextual understanding and ethical oversight that models cannot replicate This represents not the end of coding as we know it, but rather its evolution. Organizations approaching this transition thoughtfully are gaining significant competitive advantages, while those pursuing complete AI automation may encounter challenges including security vulnerabilities, misaligned outputs, and strategic limitations. Conversely, companies that resist AI adoption altogether risk falling behind as competitors leverage these tools to accelerate development cycles, reduce costs, and innovate more rapidly. The worst position in today's market is not transitioning too quickly, but failing to transition at all. The future of development lies not in humans versus AI, but in humans and AI collaborating to create possibilities neither could achieve independently. The transformation is underway, and the right approach presents an opportunity rather than a threat. I may be wrong, but as your AI concierge, my job is to help you navigate this rapidly evolving landscape with clarity and balance. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Follow me for a mix of 90s throwback vibes, cutting-edge AI insights, and entrepreneurial expertise to fuel your journey—let’s connect the past and future together!

  • View profile for Jared Spataro

    Chief Marketing Officer, AI at Work @ Microsoft | Predicting, shaping and innovating for the future of work | Tech optimist

    97,714 followers

    It’s easy to think of AI as a time-saver that streamlines workflows and accelerates output. But the deeper opportunity lies in how it’s reshaping the nature of work itself. A new study from Harvard Business School’s Manuel Hoffmann followed more than 50,000 developers over two years, with half using GitHub Copilot. The results were striking: developers shifted away from project management and toward the core work of coding. Not because someone told them to, but because AI made it possible. With less need for coordination, people worked more autonomously. And with time saved, they reinvested in exploration—learning, experimenting, trying new things. What we’re seeing here isn’t just productivity. It’s a shift in how work gets done and who does what. Managers may spend less time supervising and more time contributing directly. Teams become flatter. Hierarchies adapt. This is just one signal of how generative AI is changing our org charts and challenging us to rethink how we structure, support, and lead our teams. The future of work isn’t just faster. It’s more fluid. And if we get this right, it’s a whole lot more human. https://lnkd.in/gaUgXnRY

  • View profile for Gajen Kandiah

    Chief Executive Officer Rackspace Technology

    21,870 followers

    📌 “𝗙𝗼𝗿 𝗖𝗹𝘂𝗲𝘀 𝗢𝗻 𝗔𝗜’𝘀 𝗜𝗺𝗽𝗮𝗰𝘁 𝗢𝗻 𝗝𝗼𝗯𝘀, 𝗪𝗮𝘁𝗰𝗵 𝗧𝗼𝗱𝗮𝘆’𝘀 𝗧𝗲𝗰𝗵 𝗝𝗼𝗯𝘀”   I recently connected with Joe McKendrick to share my perspective on how AI is reshaping the tech workforce. Grateful to see our conversation featured in Forbes.   Joe underscores a point we’ve been emphasizing for months: 𝗔𝗜 𝗶𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗮 𝗵𝗲𝗮𝗱𝗰𝗼𝘂𝗻𝘁 𝗿𝗲𝗱𝘂𝗰𝗲𝗿—𝗶𝘁’𝘀 𝗮 𝗰𝗮𝗽𝗮𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗺𝘂𝗹𝘁𝗶𝗽𝗹𝗶𝗲𝗿.   It moves the constraint from compute cycles to the Human Intent Layer, where talent, judgement, and abstraction become the new premium.   Fresh labor signals back this up: 🔹450,000+ US tech openings (CompTIA) 🔹AI-related job postings nearly doubled YoY 🔹50%+ wage premium for AI-fluency (PwC) 🔹Revenue per employee rising 3x faster in AI-driven sectors 🔹12%+ of tech job ads now reference AI—and climbing (Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta)   As I note in the article, we’re not witnessing the end of software engineering—we’re seeing its evolution. Developers are becoming AI trainers, strategic integrators, and adaptive problem-solvers.   𝗖𝗼𝗱𝗲 𝗶𝘀 𝗮 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗺𝗼𝗱𝗶𝘁𝘆. What matters is how well we frame problems, guide systems, and turn intelligence into outcomes.   Thank you, Joe, for the thoughtful conversation. To other leaders: where do you see this shift heading?   📖 Read the full article linked below.   #AI #FutureOfWork #TechJobs #Leadership

  • View profile for Roy Derks

    Building AI products for developers at IBM | Developer Experience & AI | Public Speaker & Author

    11,894 followers

    AI won’t replace developers. But it will change what development looks like. Right now, AI is great at the “easy” parts—writing boilerplate code, suggesting fixes, and even generating entire functions. The real challenge? Extensive code reviews, debugging, and deployment tasks. Many senior devs joke about quitting tech to start a farm. Maybe it’s because AI is turning coding into something else: less about writing and more about overseeing. But here’s todays issue: AI doesn’t understand problems. It doesn’t think —it generates. Someone still has to break down complex issues, verify solutions, and own the outcomes. The best developers won’t just write code. They’ll guide AI, define problems, and shape how software is built. The real question isn’t whether AI will replace programmers. It’s what programming will look like when AI is standard. What do you think?

  • View profile for Thorsten L.
    Thorsten L. Thorsten L. is an Influencer

    CEO @ InnovareAI - Autonomous AI Agent Development | TechStars Mentor | fmr SU Global Ambassador

    17,321 followers

    I’ve been playing with Claude’s latest release, and it’s impressive. So, will developers now face what writers did when GPT first arrived? Claude 3.7 Sonnet introduces hybrid reasoning—switching between rapid execution and deep analytical thinking. That means it can: Write and debug complex code Read, analyze, and edit entire repositories Solve real-world software challenges autonomously When GPT-3 launched, people thought AI would replace writers. Instead, it took over repetitive tasks while the best writers adapted, using AI to move faster and think bigger. Now, the same shift is happening in software development. Junior coding roles are shrinking. AI is already handling boilerplate code and routine debugging. The role of a developer is changing. The best engineers won’t just write code. They’ll design AI workflows, debug AI-driven systems, and focus on architecture and strategy. Creativity is the real advantage. AI can optimize, but it can’t think like a human. The real skill is solving new problems AI hasn’t encountered before. Claude 3.7 won’t replace developers. But developers who ignore AI will be replaced by those who know how to use it. Is this the same shift we saw with writing? Or is software development different

  • View profile for Babar Bhatti

    AI Executive | MutualMind Founder (Acquired) | Enterprise AI Transformation Leader | IBM | Author of Two AI Books | Built 10K+ Dallas AI Community | Keynote Speaker

    13,730 followers

    The world of software and coding is changing rapidly because of AI. Generative AI coding assistants 💁♀️ are shifting the workload from manual coding ⌨️ to low-code/no-code 🛠️ tools. Initially many developers 💻 made fun of the coding tools because they made mistakes and had reliability issues. But that misses the point that AI is better and faster at learning from mistakes than anything else. As with other fields, its not the novice person who gets most out of these coding assistants. The experienced person who knows what to ask, how to ask and how to use the output stands to gain most out of these tools. Gone are the days when you had to write everything from scratch. Instead of spending time on writing boilerplate code, developers can focus on designing logic, debugging, and optimizing AI-generated code for best performance. Training yourself on big picture questions (understanding the context) and architecture will drive career success. It will take a while to adapt to these changes. Today is a good day to start. https://lnkd.in/gEWT-qvq I'd like to learn from you, please share your experience with coding assistants in comments.

Explore categories