Reasons Studios Sue AI Content Generators

Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.

Summary

Major entertainment studios like Disney and Universal are suing AI content generators over alleged copyright violations, claiming that these tools use copyrighted material without permission to train AI models and create new content. This legal battle highlights concerns about intellectual property, fair use, and control over profits in the AI era.

  • Understand copyright issues: Using copyrighted material to train AI models can lead to legal challenges, especially if the output closely resembles protected works.
  • Secure proper licensing: Before training or deploying AI models, ensure all materials are legally licensed to avoid disputes and potential lawsuits.
  • Monitor industry trends: Keep an eye on legal precedents and regulations in the AI space as they evolve, as these could reshape how AI tools are developed and used.
Summarized by AI based on LinkedIn member posts
  • View profile for Justin Seeley

    L&D Community Advocate | Sr. Learning Evangelist, Adobe

    12,003 followers

    The AI art reckoning has arrived. Disney and Universal are suing Midjourney—and this might be the case that transforms generative AI forever. At the heart of the lawsuit? Copyright. But it’s bigger than that. According to the complaint, Midjourney scraped thousands of copyrighted movie stills to train its model—without permission. Not just any stills, either. We’re talking about iconic visuals from Star Wars, Harry Potter, Jurassic Park, and Frozen. Then it allowed users to generate “knockoff” versions with prompts like Harry Potter as a 1980s anime, or Stormtroopers in a Wes Anderson film. This isn’t a fringe lawsuit from an indie artist. It’s a direct challenge from the two biggest content empires on Earth. And the implications are massive. • If Disney wins, it could force all GenAI models to purge copyrighted materials from their training sets • It may set a precedent that prompts involving IP are themselves a form of infringement • Every AI model—from OpenAI to Google to Adobe—will be watching closely Here’s my take: This lawsuit isn’t about stopping AI. It’s about controlling who profits from it. The entertainment industry sat back while AI companies built billion-dollar valuations using their IP. Now they’re coming for their cut. And if they succeed, the entire training ecosystem behind today’s top GenAI tools may need to be rebuilt—legally licensed, tightly controlled, and far more expensive to operate. That could change everything. Not just for image generation, but for every domain of GenAI—text, video, voice, code, you name it. We’re entering a new chapter in the AI era. Buckle up, folks! 📖 Full article: https://lnkd.in/er-qUThC

  • View profile for Elliot G.

    Managing Partner of Growth•listic | Early-Stage Startup Advisory Firm helping founders make their startup relatable to all stakeholders | Matching founders with the right investors with a Player-Scout mindset.

    16,552 followers

    Big news from Hollywood: The Walt Disney Company and NBCUniversal have just filed the first major lawsuit by top studios against a generative AI company, Midjourney, alleging copyright infringement. For years, the conversation around AI in entertainment has focused on actors and writers fighting to protect their likeness and work. Now, the studios themselves are drawing a line in the sand, teaming up to defend their iconic characters and IP from being used to train AI models and generate lookalike images without permission. The lawsuit, filed in California, alleges both direct and secondary copyright infringement against Midjourney. The studios claim Midjourney’s tool can churn out images virtually identical to beloved characters from “The Lion King,” “Aladdin,” and NBCU’s “Minions”—and that repeated attempts to resolve the issue privately were ignored. Instead, Midjourney allegedly doubled down, releasing new versions of its service that the studios say produce even higher-quality infringing images. This case could set a precedent for how copyright law applies to AI-generated content, with the studios seeking not just damages but also an injunction to stop further use and distribution of their copyrighted material. Hollywood isn’t alone here; other industries, like news media, are also launching lawsuits against AI companies over similar concerns. Last week, Universal Music Group, Warner Music Group, and Sony Music Entertainment began talks to license their work to AI startups Udio and Suno for equity. This deal could resolve lawsuits between the companies, which sued Udio and Suno last year for copyright infringement. Can we expect the same talks to begin with Disney, NBCUniversal, and MidJourney? Stay tuned, this story is just getting started. #AI #Disney #Universal #MidJourney #IP

  • View profile for Ricky Ray Butler
    Ricky Ray Butler Ricky Ray Butler is an Influencer

    Passionate about AI, RevTech, and Entertainment.

    13,570 followers

    Studios Draw a Line: Disney & Universal Sue Midjourney AI The Walt Disney Company and Comcast's Universal have jointly sued AI image generator Midjourney for copyright infringement. This marks the first time major studios have directly challenged an AI firm over the use of copyrighted material to train their models and generate new images. The lawsuit alleges Midjourney "helped itself to countless" copyrighted works, leading to AI-generated images (and soon, videos) that "blatantly incorporate and copy" iconic characters like Darth Vader, Minions, Frozen princesses, Shrek, and Homer Simpson. The studios are calling Midjourney a "bottomless pit of plagiarism" and a "copyright free-rider." While acknowledging the promise of AI when used responsibly, Disney's general counsel, Horacio Gutierrez, stated, "piracy is piracy, and the fact that it’s done by an A.I. company does not make it any less infringing.”

Explore categories