The Most Dangerous Answer a GC Can Give: Yes to Everything.

The Most Dangerous Answer a GC Can Give: Yes to Everything.

Hello friends and colleagues,

A GC from a global company recently told me about a week that nearly broke her team.

Her inbox delivered three urgent requests: finance wanted a 20 percent cut in outside counsel spend, operations demanded faster contracting cycles, and IT pushed hard for another AI platform.

Each request, on its own, was reasonable. Together, they were impossible.

“If I say yes to one, I fail the others,” she said. “If I try to do them all, my team burns out. And if I wait, the business loses patience.”

This is the reality of modern in-house leadership. The pressure is not one big ask, but competing asks stacked on top of each other.

Article content

From Overwhelm to Tradeoffs

The problem is not that Legal cannot deliver. The problem is when Legal tries to deliver everything.

Old mindset: stretch to cover every demand.

New mindset: frame the tradeoffs clearly and guide the business in choosing.

This GC shifted her approach. She piloted AI automation only in low-risk areas, then built dashboards that showed how Legal accelerated revenue instead of slowing it. She also sat down with finance, sales, and operations to prioritize openly, using the language of business that leaders understood. (For a practical guide, see this resource on communicating effectively with CEOs, CFOs, and other executives.)

She did not eliminate risk. She reframed it. That shift earned trust.

Article content

Tools That Clarify Choices

The best way to manage impossible asks is to make them visible. Data helps.

Milada Kostalkova explains how legal data intelligence turns contracts into structured, benchmarked insights. Instead of arguing over gut instinct, Legal can show the business which clauses align with the market and which introduce risk.

The same goes for AI. Adrienne Go ’s piece on AI literacy for product counsel shows how counsel who can translate between code and case law uncover risks earlier and partner more effectively with engineers.

And when it comes to litigation, Kassi Burns ’s guide on negotiating ESI protocols proves that the right clauses upfront prevent costly disputes later. Each of these tools sharpens visibility and frees Legal from being cornered by impossible demands.

Article content

Zoom Out: Legal Architects Alignment

This is bigger than one inbox. Legal is shifting from a reactive service function to an architect of alignment.

The role is not to chase certainty or cover every ask. It is to surface the tradeoffs, make risk and value visible, and guide the business toward intentional choices. That is how Legal becomes a trusted partner rather than a bottleneck.

Article content

Small Practices for Hard Choices

When your inbox feels stacked against you, try three practices:

  1. Name the tradeoff in the meeting. Silence creates pressure. Visibility creates alignment.
  2. Visualize choices with simple dashboards that show cost, speed, and risk impacts. Numbers move the conversation faster than memos.
  3. Start with one visible win. A small, low-risk success proves Legal can act quickly and wisely.

Small steps reduce paralysis and restore momentum.

Article content

Wrap-Up: A Question to Change the Room

The next time three urgent asks land in your inbox, skip the scramble to cover them all.

Instead, ask: “Which tradeoffs create the most value for the business, and how can Legal guide us there?”

In a world of competing demands, the leader is not the one who says yes to everything. It is the one who helps the business choose wisely.

Until next time,

Olga

P.S. This Thursday, I will be speaking at the Contract Nerds 📝 🤓 5-Year Anniversary Celebration, a virtual free event full of insights and stories from the contracting community.

And if you want to shape how legal content gets written and delivered, JD Supra is running a short survey on what makes insights most useful in the age of AI.

Article content

That’s all for this Notes to My (Legal) Self® edition. Subscribe now to get notified of each new edition, or share it with an aspiring legal leader who would find it valuable.

Check out the Notes to My (Legal) Self® podcasts available on Spotify, Apple, or YouTube. It is full of great insights from your peers!


Olga V. Mack is a leading innovator in the legal field, driving digital transformation and championing the use of technology to modernize law. With a focus on efficiency, accessibility, and client-centric solutions, she has redefined traditional legal practices through groundbreaking tools, strategies, and advocacy. As an award-winning CEO, General Counsel, accomplished author, and sought-after thought leader, Olga is dedicated to empowering the legal profession to embrace transformative technologies and stay adaptable in an ever-evolving world.

Valentin Feklistov

Lawyer, CEO at FutureLaw Conference, Founder of LEGID

2mo

As in the movie “Yes Man” 😃 Excessive yes leads to excessive practice

Like
Reply

Important reminder, Olga. Agreeing to handle every request can blur priorities, erode boundaries, and lead to burnout for legal teams. As GCs and outside counsel, we need to set clear expectations, focus on strategic tasks, and empower business teams with self-service processes to keep legal running smoothly. Great piece!

Like
Reply
Adv. Ronit Bernstein- Avrahams

Deputy General Counsel | SVP | Deputy Chief legal officer | Global games/media/tech Regulation, Global Privacy, global Employment & Compliance @ Playtika Holding Corp. | The legal500 GC Powerlist 2023| Mentor

2mo

This has been an amazing read! It truly reflects our day to day challenges. We are in house to advise, reflect risks and help navigate the business on bumpy roads. Despite all still not sure how to enhance the trust … an ongoing challenge.

Jibran Zia

Leading a powerhouse team of 100+ | Hiring A-Players to Join Marketing Revolution in Pakistan 🚀 | 80M+ Views | 17+ Niches | Grow 10k followers in 180 days guaranteed

2mo

AI in law is less about replacing judgment and more about removing friction. The real advantage comes when lawyers spend less time on routine and more on strategy.

Like
Reply

Amen. Well said, Olga.

Like
Reply

To view or add a comment, sign in

More articles by Olga V. Mack

Explore content categories