How EY’s Audit Shortcuts Led to a $50K PCAOB Smackdown
When shortcuts meet audit standards, someone pays the price literally. The PCAOB has fined EY Peru $50,000 for audit violations tied to Gilat Networks Peru S.A., exposing what happens when documentation and supervision slip below professional rigor.
At the center of it:
- Incomplete audit documentation (violating AS 1215)
- Weak revenue recognition testing (AS 1105, AS 2301, AS 2401, AS 2201)
- Lax partner supervision (AS 1201)
The PCAOB didn’t just issue a fine. It barred the lead auditor for 3 years and mandated 40 hours of continuing audit education, reinforcing that shortcuts aren’t time-savers; they’re reputation killers.
Key Takeaways
- Documentation is non-negotiable. If it’s not written, it didn’t happen.
- Fraud risk isn’t optional. Red flags deserve deep scrutiny, not dismissal.
- Supervision is leadership. You can’t delegate accountability.
- Continuous education protects credibility. 40 hours of CPE isn’t punishment; it’s prevention.
A Word to the Wise
For CPAs and auditors, this is more than a story about EY; it’s a reminder that trust and compliance are earned one document at a time. Because in auditing, your paper trail is your reputation.
Read the full article on MYCPE ONE Insights → How EY’s Audit Shortcuts Led to a $50K PCAOB Smackdown
Stay ahead of stories that shape the accounting world.