Exploring Goose: An RNN with the Advantages of a Transformer
I have explored before how the breakthrough notion that “attention is all you need” laid the foundation for today’s GenAI revolution. In this context, “attention” refers to an AI model’s ability to weigh each input in relation to others. In transformer-based models like ChatGPT and Midjourney, this mechanism allows every word in a sentence to be compared with every other, unlocking deep contextual understanding.
While attention-based models have powered much of AI’s recent progress around LLMs, they come with serious limitations. As I have described various times before, their core design leads to exponential increases in computational cost as models scale. Furthermore, despite massive training datasets, LLMs still produce errors, often producing hallucinations or failing to defend against biases.
To this point, in past editions of the AI Atlas, I covered emerging models like Hyena, Mamba, and Samba that challenge the dominance of attention-based approaches. Today, I am exploring another major leap that could reshape the AI landscape once again: RWKV and the project's newly announced Goose model.
🗺️ What is Goose/RWKV?
Goose is the nickname for a new model designed by the team behind RWKV architecture (Receptance Weighted Key Value), a new AI approach that blends the strengths of two widely-used approaches in machine learning: transformers and Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs). Transformers, which power models like ChatGPT, are highly effective at understanding language and long-range context, but they come with steep computational and memory costs, which scale exponentially with the size of inputs. RNNs, on the other hand, process data sequentially and are much more efficient, but typically fall short in performance and are harder to scale.
RWKV is designed to capture the best of both of these approaches. It trains like a transformer with parallel processing and runs like an RNN with lower memory and resource requirements during deployment. This unique architecture allows it to scale up to very large sizes while remaining efficient, making it an option for businesses that want to build powerful LLM applications without as much infrastructure burden.
Recommended by LinkedIn
🤔 Why RWKV Matters and its Limitations
Goose, and RWKV more broadly, stand out because they challenge the assumption that high-performing LLMs must be computationally expensive:
- Cost-efficiency: RWKV uses significantly less memory and computing power when generating outputs. This makes it ideal for deployment in cost-sensitive environments, such as consumer-facing chatbots that are frequently accessed.
- Scalability: Despite being more lightweight, RWKV can still scale up to tens of billions of parameters and in testing demonstrated performance on par with similarly-sized transformer models. It is one of the first models to offer this kind of efficiency at such a large scale.
- Flexibility: Because RWKV is lighter and less resource-intensive, it opens the door to deploying powerful AI in places where traditional models struggle, like on-prem infrastructure, edge devices, or real-time systems.
That said, like any new architecture, RWKV comes with trade-offs to consider:
- Long-term memory: Because its efficient design funnels information through fewer paths than traditional transformers, RWKV may struggle with tasks that require detailed recollection over very long sequences.
- Sensitivity: The model’s performance varies wildly based on how a question or instruction is phrased, more so than with transformers. This means prompt engineering becomes even more important to get optimal results.
- Nascency: While RWKV shows strong results and is open-source, it is still in early stages of development and does not yet have the mature tooling that transformer-based models have enjoyed over the past few years. Businesses would need to invest more up front in order to implement and fine-tune the architecture effectively.
🛠️ Use Cases of RWKV
The innovations introduced by RWKV are extremely promising for applications at the intersection of sequence-based data and operational efficiency, such as:
- Edge AI: RWKV’s resource efficiency makes it promising for analyzing data on devices with limited computing power, such as wearables or industrial sensors.
- Summarization at scale: RWKV could be used to efficiently handle long documents without incurring high processing costs.
- Real-time decisions: In call centers or other conversational platforms, where numerous rapid AI responses are needed, RWKV could help cut down on latency and improve customer experience.
Serial Entrepreneur | Built & Exited Companies in Retail, Healthcare, Creative Industries | Founder of @Onemor, the first Gen-Z fitness platform
4moReally interesting direction. Goose seems to hit a sweet spot between transformer performance and RNN efficiency, especially relevant for apps where cost and latency matter. Curious to see how the ecosystem evolves around RWKV.
Fascinating breakdown Rudina Seseri. Goose and RWKV are exciting steps toward making GenAI more scalable, but I’d add that architecture alone won’t get us all the way there. For AI to operate effectively in real-world, human-facing contexts - especially on edge devices, in call centers, etc., AI also needs to understand the people it’s interacting with - this means layering in psychological context: the subtle social cues and cognitive signals that humans intuitively recognize but AI typically misses. Lightweight models open the door to broader adoption - but models that are also human-aware will be the ones that earn trust from the humans that depend on them.