The Hidden Dangers of Machine Identities in IAM

This title was summarized by AI from the post below.
View profile for Zulaykho Umar

IAM Engineer (IIQ/ISC) | SailPoint Certified Identity Security Engineer | CompTIA Security+ ce Certified | SailPoint Engineer | SailPoint Developer | IAM Specialist | US Citizen

I’ve worked on several IAM and SailPoint projects. And here’s something that almost no one talks about — until it causes trouble: machine identities. Service accounts, scripts, bots, integrations — all quietly running things in the background. No owner. No lifecycle. No certifications. Until one day, something breaks… or gets exploited. Most teams focus 100% on human users. But in reality, machine identities often outnumber humans 3 to 1 — and have far more privileges. I’ve seen programs mature fast once they start treating non-human identities like first-class citizens in IAM. It’s not the shiny part of SailPoint… but it’s the part that keeps you safe. Does your IAM program actively manage machine identities, or are they still living in the shadows?

Babek Guven

Senior SailPoint Engineer | IAM & Cybersecurity Expert | IdentityNow, ISC, IdentityIQ | RBAC | JML Automation | SOX/HIPAA/NIST Compliance

3w

Spot on. Machine identities often have more access than humans — and zero oversight. Treating them like first-class citizens in IAM isn’t optional anymore. Critical topic.

Like
Reply
Létitia Combes

🛡️Cybersecurity and IT/OT Transformation Consultant | ✨ Co-founder of BxC Security | 🏆 Award winner of Women Cyber Leader 2024| 🤝Thinking Partner of my customers; Talks about #cybertransformation #OTsecurity #BxC

3w

In OT environments, those “shadow” machine identities are everywhere — PLC scripts, sensors, vendor integrations. When they’re unmanaged, the blast radius is huge. Extending IAM discipline to these assets isn’t optional anymore, it’s safety-critical.

Like
Reply
See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore content categories