It’s not uncommon for life sciences companies to migrate their clinical data 3-4 times before they get it right. The pattern is predictable.  Rush the first migration to hit a deadline. Discover data integrity issues six months later. Spend the next year cleaning up what should have worked from the start. Here's what we've learned after countless migrations: The technical lift isn't the hard part.  It's understanding which data structures actually matter for your regulatory submissions. It's knowing how your statisticians will query the data two years from now. It's building in the flexibility for the acquisitions or therapeutic areas you'll add next year. Speed matters in life sciences. But not at the expense of doing it twice. #expertisedelivered  #lifesciences  #slipstream  

Ashu Sharma

I build next-gen AI and VoiceAI products for businesses — from idea to production — combining full-stack engineering with cutting-edge AI/agent expertise.

1w

It’s not uncommon to face data integrity issues, costing valuable time and resources. From what we've learned, building in flexibility from the start is key. Imagine reclaiming that time for innovation, not cleanup. Could a smart data architecture solution provide that confidence and stability for your submissions?

Like
Reply

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore content categories