How to Improve Hiring Accuracy: A Scientific Approach

This title was summarized by AI from the post below.
View profile for Steve C.

CEO @ Bespoke Placement Group | Helping Great Clients Find Solutions to their Talent Problems.

Hiring is NOT an exact science. At least that is the conclusion that Paul Sackett and his team found when they revisited met-analytic estimates of validity in personnel selection (2022). What is most likely to determine success of a candidate? - Structured Interviews: Predicts candidate success 17.6% more accurately than random hiring. - Job Knowledge tests: Predicts candidate success 16.0% more accurately than random hiring. - Empirically Keyed Biodata: Predicts candidate success 14.4% more accurately than random hiring. Combining all three methods predicts success 36-42% more accurately than random hiring. What does this all mean? - No hiring process is perfect. There is no foolproof way to determine success. - There are ways to build a more scientifically sound hiring process that INCREASES the odds of success. If you are having struggles with new hire success, your hiring process MIGHT be the culprit. If you need help digging into that, I am happy to be a sounding board.

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore content categories