IBM is paving the way for agentic AI with two powerful new tools: DataPower Nano Gateway and API Developer Studio. IBM’s latest announcement introduces DataPower Nano Gateway, Fast, light and developer-owned at the app level, and API Developer Studio, a browser-based IDE that simplifies API development and deployment. Learn more in IBM’s official announcement: https://lnkd.in/eaHMjPvM #IBM #AI #Agents #APIs #Integration #Automation #Innovation
Nivin Pradeep Kumar’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
🎯 Ever had your vector embeddings go stale and break your AI features? Yeah, me too. Here's the thing: We're all building these amazing AI-powered apps, but nobody talks about what happens AFTER you create those embeddings. Your data changes. Your models evolve. Your business rules shift. And suddenly, your vectors are out of sync everywhere. However, the approach of "just rebuild all vectors every night" simply doesn't scale. Trust me, I've been there quite some times. Vector embeddings are computationally expensive. You'll still be processing them up by the time the sun comes up. For this reason, I've identified 5️⃣ patterns that saved my sanity: ✅ Dependency-Aware Propagator (for when your data changes) ✅ Semantic Change Detector (because not all changes matter) ✅ Versioned Vector Registry (switching from Hugging Face to OpenAI? I got you) ✅ Business Rule Filter Chain (for those pesky compliance requirements) ✅ Adaptive Sync Orchestrator (when Team B thinks their updates are more important than Team A's 😅) ➡️ If you are: ◼️ Fighting with stale vectors in production ◼️ Managing embeddings across microservices ◼️ Wondering why your semantic search returns outdated results ◼️ Tired of hearing "just rebuild everything" Understanding these five patterns is a must. If you want to learn about them, please watch the recording of my talk "Vector Sync Patterns: Keeping AI Features Fresh When Your Data Changes" that I delivered at the QCon Software Development Conferences. 📺 Watch: https://lnkd.in/gDyWtrwY #VectorEmbeddings #AIEngineering #SoftwareArchitecture #MachineLearning #Kafka #Microservices #RealWorldAI #DataEngineering #EventDrivenArchitecture #LessonsLearned
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
This is a very good read! Centralized planning and governed execution that is observable and auditable! As Stated below AI on Rails. It is breathtaking how quick methods are being tested and are definitely moving away from unrestricted Agent execution and workflow to a secure, observable, auditable method for critical environments with critical infrastructure. This has to be achieved as life serving infrastructure cannot tolerate failure and runaway AI agent collapse. Makes me hopeful.
Founder, Unhyped | Author of UNHYPED | Strategic Advisor | AI Architecture & Product Strategy | Clarity & ROI for Executives
IBM published the most honest agent paper I’ve seen, and it confirms the pattern many of us have been tracking for a year. Put simply: Benchmarks are not the problem, governance and orchestration are. The moment they stepped off AppWorld/WebArena and into real workflows, the shiny router–delegator setups began to break. Not because the models were weak, but because enterprise environments behave very differently to benchmark sandboxes. And IBM is unusually candid about why. What went wrong? - Too many tools and schemas drifting at different speeds - Brittle hand-offs between sub-agents - Prompt drift and tool drift over time - Failure modes that couldn’t be audited or reproduced - Inconsistent policy adherence under real SLAs - No reliable way to decline unsupported requests without guesswork - No governance story for autonomy beyond demos This is the reality almost every enterprise team hits. Agents don’t fail at reasoning, they fail at orchestration. So IBM moved to rails. What survived contact with production constraints was a single hierarchical planner coordinating specialised executors (API, browser, code), backed by a persistent task ledger, schema minimisation, deterministic parsing, reflective retries, variable tracking, and provenance logs. Not a fantastical swarm negotiating with itself, a controlled orchestrator with memory, context, and guardrails. A very different philosophy. And the shift makes sense. Enterprise means SLAs, auditability, privacy, reproducibility, and policy alignment, not demos. In their Talent Acquisition pilot, everything ran through read-only APIs with human-in-the-loop boundaries. Every answer carried a provenance panel. Unsupported requests were declined on purpose. That is what trust looks like when correctness and compliance have consequences. The numbers tell the story clearly: 26 tasks across 13 analytics endpoints in the BPO-TA benchmark ~87% accuracy on domain tasks ~78–79% valid-first-try, ~95% provenance coverage ~11.2 seconds average latency per query Up to 90% reduction in development time and ~50% reduction in development cost Baseline state-of-the-art performance on WebArena, and strong AppWorld results before adaptation Translation: the win isn’t “more agents.” The win is coordination, context, rails, and reproducible execution. Intelligence is getting cheaper. Reliable orchestration isn’t. What have I been saying ad nauseum? This lands very close to what Jon Cooke and I are building with Nebulyx AI. IBM shows the direction of travel: centralised planning, governed execution, audit-ready trajectories. Nebulyx takes the next step, we model the workflow itself as a digital twin, so every action, dependency, and constraint becomes explicit, testable, and observable before agents touch production. Agents on rails is not a slogan. It’s becoming the architectural baseline for anyone who wants clarity, safety, measurable ROI, and fewer surprises when the auditors arrive.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
IBM published the most honest agent paper I’ve seen, and it confirms the pattern many of us have been tracking for a year. Put simply: Benchmarks are not the problem, governance and orchestration are. The moment they stepped off AppWorld/WebArena and into real workflows, the shiny router–delegator setups began to break. Not because the models were weak, but because enterprise environments behave very differently to benchmark sandboxes. And IBM is unusually candid about why. What went wrong? - Too many tools and schemas drifting at different speeds - Brittle hand-offs between sub-agents - Prompt drift and tool drift over time - Failure modes that couldn’t be audited or reproduced - Inconsistent policy adherence under real SLAs - No reliable way to decline unsupported requests without guesswork - No governance story for autonomy beyond demos This is the reality almost every enterprise team hits. Agents don’t fail at reasoning, they fail at orchestration. So IBM moved to rails. What survived contact with production constraints was a single hierarchical planner coordinating specialised executors (API, browser, code), backed by a persistent task ledger, schema minimisation, deterministic parsing, reflective retries, variable tracking, and provenance logs. Not a fantastical swarm negotiating with itself, a controlled orchestrator with memory, context, and guardrails. A very different philosophy. And the shift makes sense. Enterprise means SLAs, auditability, privacy, reproducibility, and policy alignment, not demos. In their Talent Acquisition pilot, everything ran through read-only APIs with human-in-the-loop boundaries. Every answer carried a provenance panel. Unsupported requests were declined on purpose. That is what trust looks like when correctness and compliance have consequences. The numbers tell the story clearly: 26 tasks across 13 analytics endpoints in the BPO-TA benchmark ~87% accuracy on domain tasks ~78–79% valid-first-try, ~95% provenance coverage ~11.2 seconds average latency per query Up to 90% reduction in development time and ~50% reduction in development cost Baseline state-of-the-art performance on WebArena, and strong AppWorld results before adaptation Translation: the win isn’t “more agents.” The win is coordination, context, rails, and reproducible execution. Intelligence is getting cheaper. Reliable orchestration isn’t. What have I been saying ad nauseum? This lands very close to what Jon Cooke and I are building with Nebulyx AI. IBM shows the direction of travel: centralised planning, governed execution, audit-ready trajectories. Nebulyx takes the next step, we model the workflow itself as a digital twin, so every action, dependency, and constraint becomes explicit, testable, and observable before agents touch production. Agents on rails is not a slogan. It’s becoming the architectural baseline for anyone who wants clarity, safety, measurable ROI, and fewer surprises when the auditors arrive.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Stuart Winter-Tear provides a brilliant, granular breakdown of a profound systemic shift. IBM's journey from "shiny router-delegator setups" to "controlled orchestrators with memory and guardrails" is more than an AI story—it's the microcosm of a macro-economic transition. The 20th-Century Inheritance: The Age of the Monolith Logic: Centralized control, fixed schemas, predictable environments. Value Creation: Efficiency through standardization and scale. The AI Translation: Brittle agents that break outside benchmark sandboxes. The system fails because it's built for a world that no longer exists. The 21st-Century Emergence: The Age of Coherence Logic: Orchestrated autonomy, dynamic adaptation, sovereign participants. Value Creation: Resilience through intelligent coordination across diversity. The AI Translation: Hierarchical planners with persistent memory and provenance. The system is designed for drift, change, and real-world complexity. IBM's move to "rails" isn't a limitation; it's the recognition that intelligence is a commodity, but coherent orchestration is the scarce resource. The ~90% reduction in dev time isn't from smarter AI, but from a more coherent architecture that minimizes friction between components. This pattern repeats everywhere: in supply chains, energy grids, and capital markets. The trillion-dollar opportunity isn't in building more intelligent agents, but in building the coherence layers that allow them—and the human, corporate, and technological capacities they represent—to interact with predictable, verifiable outcomes. The future belongs not to the most intelligent entities, but to the most orchestrable systems. #CoherenceArchitecture #OrchestrationEconomy #SystemicIntelligence
Founder, Unhyped | Author of UNHYPED | Strategic Advisor | AI Architecture & Product Strategy | Clarity & ROI for Executives
IBM published the most honest agent paper I’ve seen, and it confirms the pattern many of us have been tracking for a year. Put simply: Benchmarks are not the problem, governance and orchestration are. The moment they stepped off AppWorld/WebArena and into real workflows, the shiny router–delegator setups began to break. Not because the models were weak, but because enterprise environments behave very differently to benchmark sandboxes. And IBM is unusually candid about why. What went wrong? - Too many tools and schemas drifting at different speeds - Brittle hand-offs between sub-agents - Prompt drift and tool drift over time - Failure modes that couldn’t be audited or reproduced - Inconsistent policy adherence under real SLAs - No reliable way to decline unsupported requests without guesswork - No governance story for autonomy beyond demos This is the reality almost every enterprise team hits. Agents don’t fail at reasoning, they fail at orchestration. So IBM moved to rails. What survived contact with production constraints was a single hierarchical planner coordinating specialised executors (API, browser, code), backed by a persistent task ledger, schema minimisation, deterministic parsing, reflective retries, variable tracking, and provenance logs. Not a fantastical swarm negotiating with itself, a controlled orchestrator with memory, context, and guardrails. A very different philosophy. And the shift makes sense. Enterprise means SLAs, auditability, privacy, reproducibility, and policy alignment, not demos. In their Talent Acquisition pilot, everything ran through read-only APIs with human-in-the-loop boundaries. Every answer carried a provenance panel. Unsupported requests were declined on purpose. That is what trust looks like when correctness and compliance have consequences. The numbers tell the story clearly: 26 tasks across 13 analytics endpoints in the BPO-TA benchmark ~87% accuracy on domain tasks ~78–79% valid-first-try, ~95% provenance coverage ~11.2 seconds average latency per query Up to 90% reduction in development time and ~50% reduction in development cost Baseline state-of-the-art performance on WebArena, and strong AppWorld results before adaptation Translation: the win isn’t “more agents.” The win is coordination, context, rails, and reproducible execution. Intelligence is getting cheaper. Reliable orchestration isn’t. What have I been saying ad nauseum? This lands very close to what Jon Cooke and I are building with Nebulyx AI. IBM shows the direction of travel: centralised planning, governed execution, audit-ready trajectories. Nebulyx takes the next step, we model the workflow itself as a digital twin, so every action, dependency, and constraint becomes explicit, testable, and observable before agents touch production. Agents on rails is not a slogan. It’s becoming the architectural baseline for anyone who wants clarity, safety, measurable ROI, and fewer surprises when the auditors arrive.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
The AI landscape is ever-evolving, with innovations emerging rapidly. Our esteemed partner, IBM, has unveiled Project Bob, an ingenious AI tool designed to revolutionize software development teams. This cutting-edge technology serves as a highly intelligent digital assistant, aiding in system modernization, app development, and error prevention. Internally tested, Project Bob has boosted productivity by an impressive 45%. While AI's impact may not be universal, its significance is undeniable for those who harness its power effectively. #AI #Innovation #IBM #ProjectBob https://lnkd.in/dRqWB2N5
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Red Hat just embedded AI into every developer's daily workflow. Migration from Cloud Foundry to OpenShift now happens with one-click fixes. The context switching that slows teams is disappearing. Developer Lightspeed changes how we think about application modernization. No more manual hunting for migration issues. No more context switching between tools. The AI learns from successful migrations. Gets smarter with each project. Refactoring suggestions become more accurate over time. Key capabilities that matter: 🔧 Automated replatforming from Cloud Foundry to OpenShift 🤖 Context-aware assistance in your existing workflow 📊 Flexible model options - public or self-hosted ⚡ One-click code fixes for migration issues This isn't just another AI tool. It's AI that understands your migration context. Analyzes your specific architecture. Proposes fixes that actually work. The "bring your own model" approach respects different organizational needs. Cost considerations. Performance requirements. Privacy constraints. Developers stay focused. Less switching between tools. More time solving real problems. Available now in developer preview through Red Hat Developer Hub. Migration toolkit version is generally available with Advanced Developer Suite subscriptions. The future of application modernization is becoming clearer. AI that works within your workflow. Not outside it. What's your biggest challenge in application migration today? #RedHat #AI #ApplicationMigration 𝐒𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐜𝐞: https://lnkd.in/ge63jCQZ
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Red Hat just embedded AI into every developer's daily workflow. Migration from Cloud Foundry to OpenShift now happens with one-click fixes. The context switching that slows teams is disappearing. Developer Lightspeed changes how we think about application modernization. No more manual hunting for migration issues. No more context switching between tools. The AI learns from successful migrations. Gets smarter with each project. Refactoring suggestions become more accurate over time. Key capabilities that matter: 🔧 Automated replatforming from Cloud Foundry to OpenShift 🤖 Context-aware assistance in your existing workflow 📊 Flexible model options - public or self-hosted ⚡ One-click code fixes for migration issues This isn't just another AI tool. It's AI that understands your migration context. Analyzes your specific architecture. Proposes fixes that actually work. The "bring your own model" approach respects different organizational needs. Cost considerations. Performance requirements. Privacy constraints. Developers stay focused. Less switching between tools. More time solving real problems. Available now in developer preview through Red Hat Developer Hub. Migration toolkit version is generally available with Advanced Developer Suite subscriptions. The future of application modernization is becoming clearer. AI that works within your workflow. Not outside it. What's your biggest challenge in application migration today? #RedHat #AI #ApplicationMigration 𝐒𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐜𝐞: https://lnkd.in/gsUYq7dp
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Red Hat just embedded AI into every developer's daily workflow. Migration from Cloud Foundry to OpenShift now happens with one-click fixes. The context switching that slows teams is disappearing. Developer Lightspeed changes how we think about application modernization. No more manual hunting for migration issues. No more context switching between tools. The AI learns from successful migrations. Gets smarter with each project. Refactoring suggestions become more accurate over time. Key capabilities that matter: 🔧 Automated replatforming from Cloud Foundry to OpenShift 🤖 Context-aware assistance in your existing workflow 📊 Flexible model options - public or self-hosted ⚡ One-click code fixes for migration issues This isn't just another AI tool. It's AI that understands your migration context. Analyzes your specific architecture. Proposes fixes that actually work. The "bring your own model" approach respects different organizational needs. Cost considerations. Performance requirements. Privacy constraints. Developers stay focused. Less switching between tools. More time solving real problems. Available now in developer preview through Red Hat Developer Hub. Migration toolkit version is generally available with Advanced Developer Suite subscriptions. The future of application modernization is becoming clearer. AI that works within your workflow. Not outside it. What's your biggest challenge in application migration today? #RedHat #AI #ApplicationMigration 𝗦𝗼𝘂𝗿𝗰𝗲꞉ https://lnkd.in/g8WEnxX6
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
How We Built Intelligent API Integrations with Spring Boot + AI In large enterprises, integrations have evolved beyond mere system connections to encompass the ability for systems to adapt, predict, and secure themselves. Recently, Saee collaborated with a prominent logistics and supply chain platform that encountered a significant challenge: managing thousands of legacy APIs and integration workflows. The primary challenge was the manual rules employed to detect failures or anomalies, which proved to be slow, reactive, and brittle. To address this issue, Saee implemented a comprehensive solution that included the introduction of the new Spring AI framework within its Spring Boot stack. This framework enabled the development of “smart” API gateways that not only route requests but also analyze them. Each request is scored using a lightweight AI model (integrated via Spring AI) embedded as a bean within the Spring context. Furthermore, an event-driven architecture was implemented, where APIs emit events to Kafka if the score exceeds a predefined threshold. This triggers automated quarantine workflows or human-investigation dashboards, providing a proactive approach to anomaly detection. Additionally, real-time dashboards were constructed atop Blazor/Angular, enabling operations teams to view live data, drill down on anomalies, and intervene as necessary. The outcomes achieved through these initiatives were remarkable: - 98% of API anomaly events were detected within a mere < 500 milliseconds. - Over 70% reduction in manual investigation costs. - Unified integration stack: Legacy systems and cloud-native services are now monitored in a single pane. The significance of these advancements lies in the fact that when integrations become more intelligent, business systems transition from a reactive to a proactive state. The focus shifts beyond mere API connections to empowering them with AI capabilities. For further insights into “AI-Powered API Integration Architecture with Spring Boot,” interested individuals can request the comprehensive guide by commenting “AIAPI” below. #SpringBoot #APIs #EnterpriseIntegration #SpringAI #AI #Microservices #DataStreaming #DigitalTransformation #Saee
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Search boxes will become prompt boxes. Content retrieval will be replaced by content generation. Apollo #MCP Server makes #GraphQL APIs accessible to AI agents in minutes. GraphOS gives platform teams the infrastructure to support agentic workloads. Whether you're building customer-facing agents or internal AI tools, GraphQL's declarative nature is uniquely suited for agent interactions: type-safe, self-documenting, and efficient with tokens. Learn how companies like Intuit, Indeed, and Wiz are building on this foundation. https://lnkd.in/erKZ8wag
To view or add a comment, sign in