OCC scrutiny: Separating security, governance, and quality in banking

This title was summarized by AI from the post below.
View profile for Ian Coyle, TSC, CSP

Empowering companies to unleash the potential of their data.

“We’re covered, our data is secure”? That is usually the first sign they are not. Cybersecurity is not governance. Governance is not quality. And quality, without both, falls apart. Banks blur these lines all the time, especially those closing in on the $50B threshold, where the OCC does not just recommend clarity, it demands it. Strong firewalls will not save you from weak governance. Great governance will not matter if your data quality collapses. Each discipline is distinct, critical, and under scrutiny. When the OCC comes knocking, they are not just asking if your data is safe. They are asking: * Who owns it? * What policies govern it? * Can you trace it from creation to destruction? Security keeps intruders out. Governance keeps insiders aligned. Quality keeps decisions grounded in reality. Without clear governance, “we’re secure” is not enough. How is your organization separating these three disciplines? Read the full Data Ideology article here: https://lnkd.in/eh7h_w3i #DataGovernance #Banking #RiskManagement #OCC #DataStrategy #DataQuality #CyberSecurity

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore content categories