P-token boosts Solana's efficiency and scalability

💰 Understanding the Solana Token Program (SPL) 1/ If you’re building on Solana with Rust, you’ll come across the Token Program—often called SPL Token. It’s the backbone of fungible & non-fungible tokens on Solana. Let’s break it down 👇 2/ What is the Token Program? It’s a standard, pre-built Solana program that handles all token logic: Minting tokens Transferring tokens Burning tokens Managing token accounts Think of it as Solana’s equivalent of ERC-20 & ERC-721 combined. 3/ Why not write custom token logic? Because tokens need to follow a consistent standard. If every project built its own, wallets & dApps wouldn’t know how to interact. SPL Token ensures interoperability across the Solana ecosystem. 4/ Accounts, not balances On Solana, balances don’t live inside wallets. 👉 Instead, tokens are held in token accounts (special accounts linked to an owner + mint). This design enables parallel execution and massive scalability. 5/ Mints & Token Accounts Mint = the definition of a token (like the blueprint). Token Account = holds a balance of a particular mint for a user. Example: USDC on Solana has one mint. Every holder owns a token account tied to that mint. 6/ Program Ownership The Token Program owns and validates token accounts. This means security is guaranteed by the standard program, not by each developer reinventing the wheel. 7/ Composability Since all tokens follow the same standard: Wallets can display balances easily DeFi apps (DEXs, lending, staking) can integrate without custom work NFTs (yes, they’re also SPL tokens!) can plug directly into marketplaces 8/ Why it matters for Rust developers When you build Solana programs in Rust, you rarely need to reimplement token logic. 👉 Instead, you use the Token Program through CPI (Cross-Program Invocation). Your program can mint, transfer, or burn tokens securely and consistently.

🔹 FastNode launches private #Solana RPC nodes at $2,000/month 🔥 For the node-provider market, this is a real game-changer: running a Solana Foundation RPC node means accessing one of the most high-performance, resource-demanding networks in the world. It’s not just infrastructure — it’s direct entry into the Solana ecosystem with enterprise-grade reliability. Why this matters:  ✅ Private RPC — your own Solana endpoint, not a shared one.  ✅ No DevOps hassle — we handle updates, telemetry, and monitoring for you.  ✅ FastNode reliability — automated upgrades, 24/7 oversight, and zero downtime.  ✅ Position in the market — Solana keeps growing, and having a dedicated RPC = you’re a participant, not just a spectator.  ✅ Opportunities unlocked — DeFi, NFT projects, staking dashboards, analytics, new integrations — all become possible only with your own node. 👉 For just $2,000/month, you get a plug-and-play entry ticket into Solana — without the operational risks. FastNode = 🚀 speed + 🛡 security + 💰 scalability. 📌 DM us today to claim your dedicated Solana RPC node: George Wilstein

Ethereum runs on gas. Solana runs on compute units. So, how does Neon connect these two worlds? - On Ethereum, EIP-1559 ties execution and priority together: your priority fee is baked into gasPrice. The more gas your tx burns, the bigger the tip. - On Solana, priority is different: it’s defined by Compute Units (CU price × CU limit), independent from execution and storage costs. This independence is what Ethereum's model doesn’t capture. To make EVM speak Solana, we shifted Solana’s priority from gasPrice into gasLimit: - gasPrice = stable baseline cost (execution + storage) - gasLimit = execution gas + an explicit block that represents your tip The result’s a tx cost model for accurate fee estimation and predictability, that behaves Solana-native while staying compatible with EVM tooling (MetaMask, ethers, web3.js). Catch the full breakdown here: https://lnkd.in/d-cdyDzM

🚨Ethereum vs. Solana: The Fight That Shouldn’t Exist The Ethereum vs. Solana debate is everywhere. Who’s faster? Who’s cheaper? Who’s “winning”? To my mind, the truth is that it isn’t a zero-sum battle. Comparing ETH and SOL as if they were substitutes misses the deeper architecture of Web3. Ethereum is the neutral settlement layer. It’s where credibility lives: deepest liquidity, client diversity, institutional trust, and a scaling roadmap through L2s. If you need composable DeFi and the assurance that your protocol will integrate with others - you start on ETH/L2. Solana Foundation, on the other hand, is the consumer execution layer. It’s optimized for throughput, real-time UX, and micro-transactions. If you’re building gaming, social, or internet-like applications, SOL delivers speed and cost efficiency ETH simply doesn’t prioritize. In other words, if it is a tech question, builders would have preferred not to pick side. They’ll architect systems that settle on Ethereum Foundation and execute on SOL.  It’s all about interoperability. And in that architecture, both chains win.

A new proposal from the developers behind Solana Firedancer could greatly enhance Solana's performance by removing a key computational limit. The new SIMD-0370 proposal aims to remove the fixed compute block limit, allowing dynamic scaling based on validator capacity. This could create a performance feedback loop, encouraging validators to upgrade hardware and software. However, critics warn of potential centralization risks, where only the most well-funded validators may thrive. https://lnkd.in/d5ziGtav

Everyone’s talking about Solana’s speed or Ethereum’s L2 boom. But while attention was elsewhere, Sui quietly built a $2B DeFi economy — and Wall Street just opened the door. This year alone, the network has grown to nearly ~$𝟮𝗕 𝗶𝗻 𝗧𝗩𝗟, with forecasts suggesting it could double toward $4B before year-end. Yet here’s the paradox: while adoption is exploding, the 𝘚𝘜𝘐 𝘵𝘰𝘬𝘦𝘯 𝘱𝘳𝘪𝘤𝘦 𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘭𝘭 𝘭𝘢𝘨𝘴 𝘣𝘦𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘥 𝘪𝘵𝘴 𝘧𝘶𝘯𝘥𝘢𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘴. The ecosystem is buzzing with projects like 𝗗𝗲𝗲𝗽𝗕𝗼𝗼𝗸, Sui’s on-chain order book powering liquidity at scale, and 𝗪𝗮𝗹𝗿𝘂𝘀, which blends decentralized storage with innovative yield mechanics. These aren’t just experimental dApps — they’re the kind of primitives that form the backbone of a financial ecosystem. And the institutions are watching. Grayscale launched new trusts for DeepBook and Walrus, giving investors direct exposure to Sui’s infrastructure. 21Shares even filed for a 𝘀𝗽𝗼𝘁 𝗦𝗨𝗜 𝗘𝗧𝗙 in the U.S., a signal that mainstream finance is no longer ignoring this network. But here’s the tension: adoption is breaking records, institutional trust is growing, and infrastructure is maturing… yet the 𝘁𝗼𝗸𝗲𝗻 𝗽𝗿𝗶𝗰𝗲 𝗵𝗲𝘀𝗶𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗲𝘀. That disconnect raises the real question: 👉 Is this a rare accumulation window before Sui Foundation catches up to its fundamentals? 🤔🤔 Or is the market telling us to slow down, reminding us that growth in TVL doesn’t always mean instant price surges? What’s certain is that Sui has proven it can scale faster than most chains, attract serious developers, and now win institutional validation. Whether this translates into a sustained bull run depends less on hype and more on 𝗵𝗼𝘄 𝘀𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗰𝗵𝗲𝘀 𝘂𝗽 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗳𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗮𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗮𝗹𝘀 If the fundamentals hold, early believers might just be holding one of the most underpriced assets of 2025. Personally, I believe before end of 2026, we might be looking at $170B FDV. 💬 What are your thoughts on Sui?

🌌 Pikamoon ($PIKA) Migrates from Ethereum to Solana: A Bold New Chapter 🚀 The Web3 gaming project Pikamoon ($PIKA) has announced a major strategic shift: a migration from Ethereum to Solana. This move represents more than just a chain swap — it’s a complete transformation of how Pikamoon intends to scale, secure liquidity, and build long-term value for its community. 🔍 Why the Migration? Performance & Costs: Solana offers lower transaction fees and faster throughput, making it a better fit for high-frequency gaming economies. User Experience: Smooth, near-instant transactions create a better gameplay and trading environment for players. Fresh Start & Liquidity Expansion: Relaunching on Solana means cleaner infrastructure, new exchange listings, and potential liquidity growth in a thriving ecosystem. 🪙 Migration Mechanics A one-way bridge (via Wormhole) allows $PIKA holders to swap ERC-20 tokens for Solana SPL tokens 1:1. The bridge is open for a 45-day window. After that, any un-bridged ERC-20 tokens will be burned, reducing overall supply. Vesting schedules and locked tokens are preserved in the migration process. ⚖️ Strengths & Risks Strengths ✅ Lower gas + faster gameplay transactions ✅ Supply squeeze from burned un-bridged tokens ✅ Renewed momentum with exchange and DEX integrations on Solana Risks ⚠️ Bridge security – Wormhole has history of exploits; audits are critical ⚠️ User friction – Non-crypto-native holders may miss deadlines or face complexity ⚠️ Liquidity challenges – Exchange support must scale to maintain stable trading 🔮 What to Watch Adoption Metrics: How many ERC-20 tokens get bridged in time? Liquidity Depth: Support on Solana DEXs and CEXs. Holder Confidence: Whether the community embraces the swap or hesitates. Price Action: Will reduced supply + lower costs translate into sustainable value? ✨ Final Thought The Pikamoon migration is a high-stakes bet on speed, efficiency, and scalability. If executed well, it could unlock new opportunities for the project’s Web3 gaming ambitions and cement Solana as the home for its growing ecosystem. But the real test will be in execution: clear communication, user-friendly bridging, and robust liquidity. The next 45 days will define Pikamoon’s rebirth. 🔗 What do you think: Will Solana give Pikamoon the competitive edge it needs, or will migration risks outweigh the rewards? Share your thoughts below 👇 #Pikamoon #CryptoGaming #GameFi #BlockchainGaming #Solana #Ethereum #Web3 #NFTGaming #PlayToEarn #CryptoTrends 🎮🪙🚀

The Pikamoon migration is a high-stakes bet on Solana’s speed and scalability. If done right, it could transform PIKA from a niche token into a competitive force in Web3 gaming. But execution is everything: user-friendly bridging, strong liquidity, and clear communication will determine whether this is a rebirth — or a stumble. #Pikamoon #CryptoGaming #GameFi #BlockchainGaming #Solana #Ethereum #Web3 #NFTGaming #PlayToEarn #CryptoTrends 🎮🪙🚀

Note: I have been doing Solidity Smart Contract development and auditing for last ~4 years. I just started development in Solana ecosystem. Among other factors like combo of consensus algo, one secret sauce behind the speed and performance of Solana is the transaction execution mechanism. When it comes to transaction execution, EVM operates as a single-threaded blocking execution flow. It means, that transactions are executed one by one. Next transaction will only be executed once the current execution is completed. Whereas, Solana has taken a ground breaking approach. It leverages multi-core GPU based non-blocking execution flow. It means, if a transaction does not depend on any other transaction, it will be executed using a different core, in parallel with other transactions. If you guys want to dive deep into overall Solana's blockchain-level architecture and Solana Virtual Machine execution architecture, then stay tuned for more posts.

Full transparency: I am the original dev/founder of $RSOL 💎 token meme on Solana network with diamond 💎 hands, I mean 💎 👠 👠 and holding "the floor"! No presales, no hidden wallet, no insiders... no fluff. I uploaded the Bubblemaps and asked ChatGPT about the "health" of the chart... FULL TRANSPARENCY. AS IS. You can do it yourself, too! CA: 61wgvSvxv4NrCizCn5NrGTgLkvXqsxfsXKDfVyqzGV8i Here are the findings: 🌐 RSOL Holder Health Update – Sept 2025 Every day, 1,000+ tokens launch on Solana. Most disappear within hours. <5% ever make it to Raydium. Of those, the majority are dominated by bots, wash trading, or one whale wallet. <1% of launches form organic clusters of real holders. 🚀 RSOL is in that top 1%. RSOL’s holder structure looks moderately healthy: Score: 7/10 decentralization. Interpretation: Good mix of team/insider wallets and outside holders. Early signs of community spread are present. Future watch: As the project grows, ideally these clusters will distribute further to strengthen decentralization and reduce coordinated sell risk. 🔍 What This RSOL Bubble Map Shows Clusters of Holders: The purple cluster is the most dominant, with many interconnected wallets. Likely represents team-controlled wallets, staking pools, or smart contracts. The orange cluster is also tightly linked, possibly early investors, multisig, or liquidity providers. Blue/green clusters and scattered small bubbles indicate smaller, independent holders. Distribution: Ownership is spread across multiple clusters instead of one wallet holding everything. The largest bubble exists, but it does not completely dominate the supply. Network Health: The presence of isolated smaller holders shows organic adoption and community entry. The interconnected clusters suggest insider/team coordination — which can be healthy if these are operational wallets (liquidity, staking), but should be monitored for concentration risk. ✅ Healthy Signs No single wallet holding the majority of supply. Multiple clusters = diversified control. Mix of organic community wallets and insider/team wallets. ⚠️ Risks to Watch Purple cluster concentration: if one entity controls all those linked wallets, real decentralization is lower than it appears. Orange group coordination: could act together in the market. 📊 Verdict RSOL’s holder structure looks moderately healthy: Score: 7/10 decentralization. Interpretation: Good mix of team/insider wallets and outside holders. Early signs of community spread are present. Future watch: As the project grows, ideally these clusters will distribute further to strengthen decentralization and reduce coordinated sell risk.