One number won’t tell the whole story. A shiny dashboard doesn’t mean your process is healthy. Metrics work when they: ✅ Are tied to real team goals ✅ Feed into retrospectives and planning ✅ Encourage curiosity, not blame Otherwise, they’re just noise. https://lnkd.in/dAY2-Pg4
CroCoder’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
Metrics without your knowledge are just numbers. Your knowledge without metrics is guessing. You need both. That's why we built 60+ metrics but organized them into 7 categories. You're not here to stare at dashboards all day. You have a team to lead. So pick what matters right now. Slow code reviews? Check Collaboration metrics. Team burning out? Look at Team Health. Velocity dropping? Check Delivery. When you need to dig deeper, everything's there. When you don't, ignore it. 📊 Activity - Commits, PRs, reviews, tasks ⚡ Delivery - Velocity, story points, throughput ⏱️ Cycle Time - Where work gets stuck 🔍 Code Quality - Feature vs bug ratio, rework rate 👥 Collaboration - Review time, review fairness 🧠 Team Health - After-hours work, burnout signals 🎯 Efficiency - Focus, predictability, knowledge sharing Connect GitHub or Shortcut. Everything auto-updates. You do the leading. We do the counting. #EngineeringMetrics #EngineeringLeadership #DevProductivity
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Ever spent half a sprint debating whether a task is a 3 or a 5? 😱 Story points were supposed to make planning easier, but for many teams, they’ve become more confusing than helpful. They turn into comparison games, distract from what actually matters, and rarely tell you how work is really flowing. It’s time to stop obsessing over estimates and start looking at real data instead — things like cycle time, flow efficiency, and actual outcomes. In this article, our Customer Success Manager Jessica Wolfe shares why story points don’t work the way we hope they do, and what to focus on instead if you want to get better as a team.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
🎯 Most teams chase the wrong metrics — measuring output when they should measure outcomes. We've watched brilliant engineers burn out optimizing systems that looked perfect on paper. We've seen "high-performing" systems that looked great on dashboards but failed in production. The pattern is always the same: they optimized for what was easy to measure, not what actually mattered. Let us share our point of view on what actually moves the needle: 📊 Impact over velocity Shipping 10 features that nobody uses is worse than shipping one that transforms workflows. Business MUST track adoption and retention, not just deployment frequency. 🔍 Hidden costs over visible wins That "quick fix" that saved a week? It's a ticking time bomb that will explode during someone's vacation. We've seen teams crushed by technical debt they inherited from rushed decisions. The real metric is total cost of ownership — including the human cost. 🤝 Team sustainability over individual heroics Systems built by lone wolves rarely survive their creator's departure. Measure knowledge distribution, not just individual productivity. The uncomfortable truth: The best systems often have unremarkable metrics — because they're solving the right problems, not the loudest ones. Real performance isn't about looking good in retrospectives. It's about building systems that quietly do their job while everyone focuses on what matters. At ArvelTech, we measure success by how rarely our systems wake anyone up at night. Because behind every metric is a human who deserves better. Stay positive.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
If you hang out with product and ops nerds, you know we love a good framework. RACI. DACI. OKRs. KPIs. ICE. RICE. HEART. AARRR. We collect those business acronyms like Pokémon. Here’s the thing, though: Frameworks are awesome tools — but they’re rarely a one-size-fits-all solution. Real teams, real problems, and real humans don’t fit quite so neatly into a template every single time. The best teams I’ve seen don’t worship frameworks — they try them and tweak them. • They simplify processes or steps that cause confusion • They rename or redefine things to make better sense for their orgs • They reinvent rituals when they stop working Structure is valuable. Rigidity isn’t. The goal isn’t to follow the playbook — it’s to win the game. How has your team iterated and evolved your favorite frameworks together?
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
I’ve always been a fan of finding synergy by combining multiple tools, models, or approaches. The benefits often aren’t linear – sometimes 1 + 1 = 3, sometimes it unlocks entirely new insights. One combo I’ve used with great success is Team Topologies + RACI. Each is useful on its own for clarifying team structure and finding improvement opportunities. But used together, they can take your understanding to the next level. For those familiar with both, some mappings are obvious: - Stream-aligned teams should be Accountable and Responsible for the outcomes they deliver - Platform teams should not be A or R for customer-facing work - Enabling teams should show up strongly in Consulted/Informed, but not A or R and so on That part is straightforward. The deeper point I want to share is something I’ve seen work flawlessly: → Start with RACI for teams as your 1st step. → Then, based on those results, do your Team Topologies mapping – team types and interaction modes. Doing it in this order often makes dysfunctions show up immediately. Misaligned responsibility..? Platform team wrongly owning the delivery..? It becomes obvious fast. RACI isn’t dead. It’s just rarely applied with intent. If you’re scaling and your team boundaries and ownership aren’t crystal clear, no one tool will save you. But RACI + Team Topologies? Much better odds. Curious - have you tried this in your org? Would you? #ClarityInScaling #TeamTopologies #RACI #OrgDesign #DeliveryLeadership
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
🚀 Ever feel like you're navigating developer performance based on gut feeling alone? It's a common challenge for engineering leaders to have objective, data-driven conversations about team dynamics and individual contributions. We're excited to announce a powerful new tool to solve this: The Keypup Team Benchmark Dashboard! This isn't about micromanagement; it's about empowerment, coaching, and building a high-performing, balanced team. Our dashboard gives you a clear, comparative view of individual developer contributions alongside aggregated team-wide statistics. With the Team Benchmark Dashboard, you can: 📊 Gain Comparative Analytics: Instantly see how individual contributions—like PR cycle time, review workload, and issue throughput—stack up against your team's average. No more guesswork. 🎯 Identify Key Contributors & Blockers: Easily spot your top performers who can mentor others, and identify developers who might be struggling or overloaded so you can offer targeted support. 💬 Facilitate Productive 1-on-1s: Walk into performance reviews and check-ins armed with objective data, leading to more constructive, impactful conversations about growth and improvement. ⚖️ Ensure Fair Workload Distribution: Visualize how work is spread across the team to prevent burnout and ensure that knowledge isn't siloed with a few key members. The ideal tool to move from subjective feedback to data-informed leadership. It's time to unlock a new level of understanding about your team's health and performance. #EngineeringAnalytics #DeveloperProductivity #TeamBenchmark #EngineeringLeadership #DevOps #TeamPerformance #DataDriven https://lnkd.in/ewrkayiy
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
A messy backlog isn’t a sign of a busy team — it’s a sign of unclear priorities. I learned that the hard way. When I first became a Product Owner, I treated the backlog like a parking lot for every idea, request, or "nice-to-have." After a few months, I realized most of those items would never be built — they just made it harder to find what actually mattered. So I changed my approach: the backlog isn’t a wish list, it’s a decision log. Every item should have a clear purpose, owner, and timeline — or it’s archived. My Simple Routine for Backlog Grooming Review every 2 weeks — remove outdated or low-impact items. Add context — why it matters, what problem it solves. Rank by impact, not noise — avoid prioritizing just because someone shouts loudest. Revisit old tickets — sometimes timing, not ideas, is the issue. Keeping the backlog lean helps the team move with confidence. It’s not about having more ideas — it’s about having the right focus. If you’re a PO or PM, you’ve probably faced the “backlog chaos” phase too. How do you keep yours clean and purposeful?
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
When business pushes for speed and engineering fights for precision everyone loses time. It’s not a people problem. It’s a process problem. We’ve seen how clear collaboration flows, shared sprint goals, visible priorities, and transparent feedback loops transform chaos into momentum. Once alignment clicks, delivery becomes consistent and the pressure fades. How well do your product and tech teams speak the same language today? #Agile #TechLeadership #ProductDelivery #TeamAlignment #SoftwareDevelopment
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Fast doesn't mean valuable. Your team finished 50 story points last sprint. Shipped 12 features. Hit every deadline. So why does it feel like nothing changed? Because activity ≠ impact. The best teams don't ask "How much did we complete?" They ask "What value did we create?" Three shifts that matter: - Define outcomes before outputs - Map deliverables to business results - Measure behaviors, not just metrics Stop chasing velocity. Start delivering value. #AgileThinking #ProjectManagement #ValueFirst #Simplify360
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Most teams fix the wrong problems again and again. Not because they lack effort, but because they never uncover the root cause. The real problem 👇 ⚠️ Jumping to conclusions without structured analysis. ⚠️ Solving symptoms instead of causes. ⚠️ Wasting hours in meetings that go nowhere. That’s not a people problem. That’s a system problem. Solution: The 5 Whys Analysis Notion Template Imagine a Notion workspace that helps you get to the real reason behind any challenge — clearly, visually, and fast. ✅ Ask “Why?” five times to dig deeper with guided structure. ✅ Identify the core issue before taking action. ✅ Turn vague discussions into focused, data-driven insights. ✅ Use it for personal growth, business strategy, or team retrospectives. Why it matters: ✔ Fix the cause, not the symptom. ✔ Save time and avoid repeated mistakes. ✔ Build a smarter, more accountable workflow. 👉 Explore the template: https://lnkd.in/g6Gi2JYB #NotionTemplate #ProblemSolving #RootCauseAnalysis #Productivity #WorkflowOptimization #BusinessStrategy #TeamManagement #NotionWorkspace #TopSystems
5 Whys Analysis Notion Template from TopSystems
To view or add a comment, sign in