Understanding vehicle-track interaction for safer railways

This title was summarized by AI from the post below.
View profile for Cristiano Jorge

Senior Track Engineer at KiwiRail

Detailed knowledge on vehicle-track interaction, wheel-rail interface, and railway dynamics is essential for railway engineering professionals. Respect for operational limits is based on the advanced concepts of these research and application areas. The lives of many depend on it. Therefore, the more you study and apply them, the safer the railways becomes. Stay constantly updated. Railway engineering is like a train, constantly moving and evolving over time. Get out of inertia, get out of the basics and improve yourself more. The railways users and operators will thank you.

View profile for Valerio di Vico

Classical and Quantum Technologies | Custom Hybrid Solutions for Your Industry | Tech Innovation | Consulting | Philanthropist | Founder, Chairman & CEO of SinAura | VP Railway Mobility & Infrastructure at RailEvo

One of the Worst Train Disasters in Rail History The Santiago de Compostela train accident occurred on July 24, 2013, in the suburb of Angrois, about three kilometers from the Santiago de Compostela station. An Alvia train with eight carriages and two locomotives derailed with 222 people on board (218 passengers and 4 crew members), killing 79 people. The Santiago de Compostela train accident was mainly caused by a combination of human error and deficiencies in the safety system of the railway line. The triggering factor was the excessive speed of the train, which entered a dangerous curve at almost 124 mph, more than twice the speed limit. 𝗧𝗲𝗰𝗵𝗻𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗱𝗲𝘁𝗮𝗶𝗹𝘀 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗮𝗰𝗰𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘁 - Excessive speed The Alvia 04155 train, a hybrid diesel-electric train, was approaching Santiago station from Madrid. At the entrance to the Angrois curve, where the speed limit was 80 km/h, the driver maintained a speed of approximately 190 km/h. The high centrifugal force caused the train to derail, overturning the cars and devastatingly disemboweling the carriages. - Absence of automatic braking The section of track where the derailment occurred was not covered by the ETCS (European Train Control System) high-speed safety system, which would have slowed or stopped the train automatically. The high-speed system stopped about 4 km before the curve, leaving speed management solely to the driver. - Driver error Investigations determined that the driver was distracted by a work-related phone call at the crucial moment of the maneuver, forgetting to apply the brakes necessary to safely negotiate the curve. - Known risks The same curve had already proven to be a potential risk point for excessive speed in the past, as demonstrated by a test of the inaugural section of the line, but no adequate corrective measures had been taken. Technological innovation in the railway sector is neutralizing the few threats that still undermine rail transport safety and will further minimize the chances of similar or minor events occurring. #TrainAccident #Derailment #Railway #Innovation

Gleidson Soares

Customer Support Specialist | Rolling Stock Specialist | Waysides Monitoring Systems | Design & Inspection | Track & Signal Systems | Studies for financial feasibility | CAD |

3w

Mega ultra over speed balance!

Like
Reply

I remember using this exact incident as a case-study and supporting literature for one of the Kunieda Overturning Tools we developed a few years back.

Like
Reply
See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore content categories