Don Sampen analyzes a First District Appellate Court case in which a teacher sued for sexual misconduct sought reimbursement for defense costs under the school district’s general liability policy after the case was dismissed for want of prosecution. The court ruled that the insurer had no duty to reimburse defense costs under the policy absent a final adjudication on the merits. A DWP was not sufficient. Read more: https://lnkd.in/gp3PyG-P
Teacher's defense costs denied in misconduct case
More Relevant Posts
-
Another federal court backs higher liability standard for third-party harassment: A judge sided with the University of Pennsylvania in a case alleging harassment of an employee by a student because the school did not intend for the conduct to occur. http://dlvr.it/TP5fT1
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Delaware's top court issued a flurry of rulings last week and heard arguments on recently passed legislation that expanded liability shields for some corporate acts while the Court of Chancery passed on another round of arguments over control of Caribevision. https://lnkd.in/ePw5rn6h
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Strong outcomes start long before the courtroom. They begin here around the table where our attorneys and staff map out strategy, review evidence, and prepare every angle of a case. Legal Quick Tip: If you are pursuing a personal injury claim, keep every piece of documentation including medical records, bills, accident reports, and even texts or emails. These details give your legal team the foundation they need to build the strongest case on your behalf. Preparation is power, and at BCS&C, it is how we make sure our clients are protected. #LegalTips #TrialReady #BCSC #JusticeForYou #LasVegasLawyer
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Law Enforcement faces an enormous amount of challenges navigating their day to day. The article below outlines the weight of their decisions and the liability that follows.
This article details a tragic case in Missouri where deputies allegedly allowed intoxicated juveniles to drive away from a party, resulting in multiple fatalities has reignited critical conversations around law enforcement liability and duty of care. At Apex, we specialize in helping law enforcement agencies navigate these complex exposures. Our team brings expertise in law enforcement liability coverage both primary and excess, ensuring that departments are protected when the unexpected occurs. Message us or email at ApexMarketing@apexinsurance.com for more information. https://lnkd.in/exqtiWcq
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
£16 Million Mask Deal Collapses: Court of Appeal Overturns Massive COVID Contract Award A lot to unpack in this one including; Misrepresentation Termination, and Repudiation #SBC #CaseSummaries
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
£16 Million Mask Deal Collapses: Court of Appeal Overturns Massive COVID Contract Award A lot to unpack in this one including; Misrepresentation Termination, and Repudiation #SBC #CaseSummaries
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Yasin Patel FCIArb and Caitlin Haberlin-Chambers explore criminal liability in sports, and consider the broader impact of high-profile injuries on the development, enforcement, and public perception of safety protocols in professional sport. Follow this link to read their article in full: https://bit.ly/4oE6Vxy #SportsLaw
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
Honesty is non-negotiable in personal injury claims. Courts are increasingly using section 57 of the Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015 to dismiss entire claims where “fundamental dishonesty” is found — even if parts of the case were genuine. Our latest article explains: ⚖️ What fundamental dishonesty actually means 📚 How courts are applying it 💥 The serious consequences for claimants 🧩 What options exist if you’ve been accused of or found to be dishonest 👉 Read the full piece here: https://lnkd.in/dCBHqYhf Honesty and accuracy protect everyone — including genuine claimants.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
🎃 Why “Fundamental Dishonesty” Is One of the Most Serious Findings in Personal Injury Law. Courts are taking a tougher line on exaggerated or misleading personal injury claims. A reminder that honesty and accuracy remain the cornerstones of justice — for both claimants and defendants 🎃
Honesty is non-negotiable in personal injury claims. Courts are increasingly using section 57 of the Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015 to dismiss entire claims where “fundamental dishonesty” is found — even if parts of the case were genuine. Our latest article explains: ⚖️ What fundamental dishonesty actually means 📚 How courts are applying it 💥 The serious consequences for claimants 🧩 What options exist if you’ve been accused of or found to be dishonest 👉 Read the full piece here: https://lnkd.in/dCBHqYhf Honesty and accuracy protect everyone — including genuine claimants.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
-
The High Court’s decision in Bird v DP limited institutional liability for abuse by those who aren’t formal employees, a tough outcome for survivors and organisations alike. Now, the ACT has stepped in with laws that bring back responsibility for institutions when abuse is committed by people in positions of authority. This is an important development for legal teams and organisations to watch closely. Read more here: https://lnkd.in/g4v6_h35
To view or add a comment, sign in