Smarter, not harder. 🔎: Kelsey_Asami on x
We’ve mastered prompting; now we need synchronizing. The systems that win next will read more than commands — they’ll read context, tone, emotion. AI doesn’t need more words, it needs better alignment. ∞∇ ⩂
There's an uncomfortable truth buried in these productivity hacks: They're incredibly effective at creating dependency. Each 'helpful' prompt guide subtly trains users to outsource their thinking to a predetermined framework. We should ask ourselves—are we augmenting human capability, or are we building a generation of workers who can't function without AI-generated scripts? The competitive moat won't be who has better prompts, but who maintains the capacity for original thought.
Sorry, but isn’t that more about faking it?
What’s the prompt that stops em dashes? Because everyone I try, doesn’t work. But damn can it remember 25 other prompts just fine
Exactly. It’s not about working more, it’s about prompting smarter. When AI meets structure, productivity becomes predictable, that’s when work starts to flow instead of fight.
I appreciate ready-to-go prompts for teams but, they’re great scaffolding basically. The catch is brittleness: when a model or default changes, results can shift and folks conclude “GenAI doesn’t work anymore.” The fix is kind of to treat prompts like software: versioned templates + a small eval set so you can re-tune quickly
Alternatively, you can be yourself and not rely on a bunch of scrapped up code and algorithms to make yourself sound professional
Thanks for sharing!
AI-driven productivity hacks are a game changer. However, we should remember: the power of these tools lies not just in how quickly we can execute tasks, but in how well we can navigate the complexities of human leadership and decision-making. AI can help optimize and scale, but true innovation happens when we blend these tools with human insight. It’s about being smarter, not just faster.
Tech whisperer/Solution wizard
2wThe fake it until you make it list?