H+O reduced 6,200 wood studs in mixed-income housing

This title was summarized by AI from the post below.
View profile for Rens F. Hayes IV, P.E.

Get a third-party review of your building's structure costs with ZERO risk. | Principal - H+O Structural Engineering | Host - Design Development Podcast

H+O removed 6,200 wood studs - Mixed-income housing development - Four stories over below grade parking - ~64,000 GSF of wood framed area One more thing. We replaced about 6,000 SF of composite steel frame with wood framing... and STILL removed 6,200 studs from the original design. 👀 The design continues to comply with all development and building code standards. Now it costs less and reduces carbon footprint. Win-win-win. "It was $500,000 saved, on a $24M project. That's real money, right?" Dave Traggorth Causeway Development LLC Wondering if your building design could be more cost-effective? Know for sure with H+O's risk-free, third-party cost review. Link in comments. 👇🏼 #engineering #structure #realestate #architecture #construction

Rens F. Hayes IV, P.E.

Get a third-party review of your building's structure costs with ZERO risk. | Principal - H+O Structural Engineering | Host - Design Development Podcast

3w

https://h-o.engineering/peer-review-offer/

Like
Reply
Adam Petersen

Project Executive | Driving Operational Excellence through Technology & Systems | Real Estate + Construction Leadership

3w

This is the kind of optimization that gets overlooked too often. You're hitting cost, carbon, and code compliance at once. What stands out to me is that you replaced steel with wood and still cut thousands of studs. That's not just trimming fat, that's rethinking the whole structure. Saving 2% on a project like this adds up fast.

Marc Pozzuoli

Enabling Business Owners with Ai & Coaching

3w

2% on a project of that scale can make or break it. Good Work

See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore content categories